Pages

Monday, June 30, 2025

The Tax Cut Illusion: Why Borrowing Trillions for the Rich Makes No Economic Sense



The Tax Cut Illusion: Why Borrowing Trillions for the Rich Makes No Economic Sense

In a healthy democracy, when a nation runs a budget surplus—meaning it’s taking in more money than it's spending—it naturally sparks a debate. Do we invest in new programs and services that can benefit the public? Or do we return some of that surplus to the taxpayers through tax cuts?

That’s a fair and important debate. One that reflects our values, priorities, and vision for the future.

But what’s happened in recent decades in the United States isn’t that.

What we’ve witnessed instead is a stunning departure from fiscal logic: trillions of dollars borrowed—not during surpluses, but during deficits—from foreign creditors, all in the name of giving tax cuts to the richest individuals and corporations who already have more money than they know what to do with. That’s not just bad policy. That’s dangerous.

When a Surplus Becomes a Missed Opportunity

Let’s start with the idea of a surplus. It means the country has room to breathe—to pay down debt, invest in infrastructure, education, healthcare, or reduce the tax burden responsibly. Think of it like a family that’s finally saved up after years of tight budgets. Do they invest in their kids’ future? Fix the leaky roof? Or do they give a chunk of cash to the wealthiest family member who already owns several homes?

Now flip that on its head. Imagine instead that this family goes deep into debt to give more money to the wealthiest person in the household. That’s what happens when governments cut taxes for the rich while running massive deficits.

Borrowing to Give to Billionaires

When tax cuts are targeted at the ultra-wealthy—people who aren’t lacking investment capital—they don’t inject money into the economy in the same way a middle-class or working-class tax cut might. The rich don’t spend more because they already spend what they want. They don’t suddenly create more businesses because they already have access to capital markets. They mostly just hoard more wealth or buy back their own companies’ stock.

To pay for these tax cuts, the government borrows money—often from foreign nations like China or Japan. That means our children—rich or poor—will be the ones footing the bill through future taxes, higher interest payments, and fewer public services. It’s economic short-termism disguised as strategy.

The Myth of Trickle-Down Economics

The justification for this, of course, is the long-debunked myth of trickle-down economics: the idea that if you give tax breaks to the wealthy, the benefits will eventually “trickle down” to everyone else through job creation and investment.

But the data tells a different story.

Income inequality widens. Wages stagnate. The ultra-wealthy consolidate more power. And the national debt balloons—creating fiscal pressure to cut programs that benefit the majority, like education, healthcare, and retirement security.

Who Really Benefits?

Ask yourself: Who benefits when the U.S. borrows trillions to fund tax cuts for the rich?

Not the middle class. Not small businesses. Not students. Not seniors. Not future generations.

The beneficiaries are a narrow slice of society that already commands an overwhelming share of the nation’s wealth—and whose power grows as government becomes more beholden to their interests through campaign finance and lobbying.

A Broken Logic

Tax cuts can be a smart tool. So can deficit spending—when used wisely during recessions or emergencies, or when investing in long-term growth like clean energy or digital infrastructure.

But borrowing trillions during economic expansions to give tax breaks to billionaires? That doesn’t compute. It’s not economics. It’s not capitalism. It’s plutocracy in disguise.

And we’ll all pay the price. Unless we speak up, vote accordingly, and demand policies that put public good before private greed.



Grounded Greatness: The Case For Smart Surface Transit In Future Cities
The Garden Of Last Debates (novel)
Deported (novel)
Empty Country (novel)
Trump’s Default: The Mist Of Empire (novel)
The 20% Growth Revolution: Nepal’s Path to Prosperity Through Kalkiism
Rethinking Trade: A Blueprint for a Just and Thriving Global Economy
The $500 Billion Pivot: How the India-US Alliance Can Reshape Global Trade
Trump’s Trade War
Peace For Taiwan Is Possible
Formula For Peace In Ukraine
A 2T Cut
Are We Frozen in Time?: Tech Progress, Social Stagnation
The Last Age of War, The First Age of Peace: Lord Kalki, Prophecies, and the Path to Global Redemption
AOC 2028: : The Future of American Progressivism

The Hypocrisy of U.S. Agricultural Trade Demands: A Case Study in Bad Faith

Bullying misstep threatens to leave Trump presidency 'dead in the water': WSJ driving Tillis to announce he won't run for re-election could lead to a lost GOP seat in purple North Carolina — and with it the GOP's slim hold on the Senate. ....... "A common feature of Donald Trump’s two terms as President is that he can’t stand political prosperity. When events are going in his direction, he has an uncanny habit of handing his opponents a sword." The writers added that the Tillis debacle is a classic example. ....... Tillis announced his retirement over the weekend after Trump threatened he'd be challenged after expressing doubt about the bill. ....... "The GOP has a 53-47 majority now, but Susan Collins always has a tough race in Maine if she decides to run again. Democrats are targeting Joni Ernst in Iowa. In the suicide-isn’t-painless department, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton is challenging GOP incumbent Sen. John Cornyn. Mr. Paxton may be the only Republican who could lose in Texas given his record of harassing business with lawsuits, impeachment, and other embarrassments," they reported......... Combined with a possible loss of the House with its tiny GOP majority, losing the Senate could make for a dismal two years for the GOP. ...... "GOP legislative reforms will have no chance if Democrats take the House in 2026. And if they also take the Senate, forget about confirming another Supreme Court nominee. The Trump Presidency will be dead in the water," they warned.



The Hypocrisy of U.S. Agricultural Trade Demands: A Case Study in Bad Faith

When it comes to global trade negotiations, few sectors reveal the double standards of advanced economies like agriculture. The United States, often the loudest advocate for free markets, continues to shield its own agriculture sector through a complex web of subsidies, protections, and market interventions. Yet, in trade talks with developing nations like India, the U.S. insists on sweeping market access for its agricultural exports. This contradiction isn't just ironic — it's unjust, and arguably, a move in bad faith.

U.S. Agriculture: A Subsidized Fortress

The American agriculture sector is one of the most heavily subsidized industries in the country. Despite employing less than 2% of the U.S. workforce, it receives tens of billions of dollars in subsidies each year — from crop insurance and disaster relief to direct payments and price supports. These programs prop up U.S. farmers and agri-corporations, insulating them from market forces, natural shocks, and international competition.

Without these government supports, many U.S. farms — particularly the massive monoculture operations producing corn, soybeans, and wheat — would struggle to survive. In fact, some experts argue that removing these subsidies would shrink the U.S. agricultural sector dramatically, possibly even gutting its global competitiveness.

India: A Different Agricultural Reality

In contrast, agriculture in India employs nearly half of the country’s workforce and remains the backbone of its rural economy. The Indian government, too, offers supports — including minimum support prices (MSPs) and food security programs — but these are not comparable in scale or function to the U.S. subsidy system. Indian supports are primarily aimed at alleviating rural poverty, ensuring food security, and preventing mass displacement.

When the U.S. demands that India lower its tariffs or remove protections for its farmers in the name of "free trade," it is asking a country with a fragile, employment-intensive ag sector to open the floodgates to highly subsidized, industrial-scale imports. This isn’t competition on equal terms. It’s the bulldozing of vulnerable livelihoods by a well-armed global giant.

The Bad Faith of Trade Negotiations

In trade deals, fairness demands a level playing field. But what the U.S. is doing is akin to asking India to disarm while remaining heavily armored itself. For a nation that couldn’t maintain its agricultural sector without massive state support, demanding market access in a country where agriculture is tied to the very survival of hundreds of millions is deeply disingenuous.

Worse, such demands fly in the face of stated U.S. commitments to sustainable development, inclusive growth, and poverty reduction. They reek of neo-colonial attitudes — where the goal is not mutual prosperity, but market domination.

The Way Forward

True trade cooperation requires mutual respect and an honest appraisal of structural differences. If the U.S. wants India to liberalize its agriculture market, it must be prepared to address its own subsidies first. Reciprocity, not pressure, should be the basis of negotiation.

Until then, India is right to be cautious. Protecting its farmers isn’t protectionism — it’s survival. And in this case, resistance to U.S. demands isn’t economic nationalism. It’s self-defense.

Conclusion

The U.S. needs to stop talking out of both sides of its mouth. You cannot prop up your own sector with taxpayer dollars and then cry foul when others do the same. If trade is to be truly free, it must first be fair. And fairness begins with honesty — something sorely lacking in the current approach to U.S.-India agricultural trade.



Grounded Greatness: The Case For Smart Surface Transit In Future Cities
The Garden Of Last Debates (novel)
Deported (novel)
Empty Country (novel)
Trump’s Default: The Mist Of Empire (novel)
The 20% Growth Revolution: Nepal’s Path to Prosperity Through Kalkiism
Rethinking Trade: A Blueprint for a Just and Thriving Global Economy
The $500 Billion Pivot: How the India-US Alliance Can Reshape Global Trade
Trump’s Trade War
Peace For Taiwan Is Possible
Formula For Peace In Ukraine
A 2T Cut
Are We Frozen in Time?: Tech Progress, Social Stagnation
The Last Age of War, The First Age of Peace: Lord Kalki, Prophecies, and the Path to Global Redemption
AOC 2028: : The Future of American Progressivism

Grounded Greatness: The Case For Smart Surface Transit In Future Cities
The Garden Of Last Debates (novel)
Deported (novel)
Empty Country (novel)
Trump’s Default: The Mist Of Empire (novel)
The 20% Growth Revolution: Nepal’s Path to Prosperity Through Kalkiism
Rethinking Trade: A Blueprint for a Just and Thriving Global Economy
The $500 Billion Pivot: How the India-US Alliance Can Reshape Global Trade
Trump’s Trade War
Peace For Taiwan Is Possible
Formula For Peace In Ukraine
A 2T Cut
Are We Frozen in Time?: Tech Progress, Social Stagnation
The Last Age of War, The First Age of Peace: Lord Kalki, Prophecies, and the Path to Global Redemption
AOC 2028: : The Future of American Progressivism

Grounded Greatness: The Case For Smart Surface Transit In Future Cities
The Garden Of Last Debates (novel)
Deported (novel)
Empty Country (novel)
Trump’s Default: The Mist Of Empire (novel)
The 20% Growth Revolution: Nepal’s Path to Prosperity Through Kalkiism
Rethinking Trade: A Blueprint for a Just and Thriving Global Economy
The $500 Billion Pivot: How the India-US Alliance Can Reshape Global Trade
Trump’s Trade War
Peace For Taiwan Is Possible
Formula For Peace In Ukraine
A 2T Cut
Are We Frozen in Time?: Tech Progress, Social Stagnation
The Last Age of War, The First Age of Peace: Lord Kalki, Prophecies, and the Path to Global Redemption
AOC 2028: : The Future of American Progressivism

Grounded Greatness: The Case For Smart Surface Transit In Future Cities
The Garden Of Last Debates (novel)
Deported (novel)
Empty Country (novel)
Trump’s Default: The Mist Of Empire (novel)
The 20% Growth Revolution: Nepal’s Path to Prosperity Through Kalkiism
Rethinking Trade: A Blueprint for a Just and Thriving Global Economy
The $500 Billion Pivot: How the India-US Alliance Can Reshape Global Trade
Trump’s Trade War
Peace For Taiwan Is Possible
Formula For Peace In Ukraine
A 2T Cut
Are We Frozen in Time?: Tech Progress, Social Stagnation
The Last Age of War, The First Age of Peace: Lord Kalki, Prophecies, and the Path to Global Redemption
AOC 2028: : The Future of American Progressivism