You should create a role for me to go with that if you are truly concerned about AI safety. The Country of Geniuses: A Race Through AI Adolescence https://t.co/gHZGHAlXAM
a guy i know is taking ai to it's extreme. tmrw i go live w/ him and you're invited.
yesterday he: - 40 facebook ads - 100 landing pages - wrote 3 guest blog posts for backlinks - booked himself on 4 podcasts with a cold email automation - wrote 5 help desk articles -…
> Be Dario > Leave OpenAI to start frontier lab focused on safety > Elon: "zero chance Anthropic succeeds" > Heads down, building > Build the best coding AI > Hyper-focused on enterprise > Clear path to profitability > Untouchable culture, 100% founders retained > Great catering… pic.twitter.com/R6H9tRsAPU
We’re on a mission to make world class primary care accessible to everyone. I'm grateful to @anniecase1 & @mamoonha for the partnership and belief in building for the patient ๐ https://t.co/d9A7NuvNsb
So I want to share a couple of thoughts here. Physical AGI is inevitable. When it arrives, it will eventually replace all manual labor, including the workers we partner with to collect data. That said, given the current state of the space, we are still nowhere near robots that… https://t.co/gb2Edlvarn
Indian labourers are training themselves out of the job.
Here's the pipeline:
1. Strap a camera to a worker's cap 2. Capture hours of egocentric footage 3. Pay them for their time (very affordable compared to American data) 4. Process the data 5. Sell it to robot companies https://t.co/yLg6hcfbG3pic.twitter.com/CPU7m7aye7
How does OpenAI balance long-term research bets with product-forward research fundamentals?
I’ve been getting this question a lot lately, usually framed as a suggestion that Jakub (@merettm) and I are pushing an increasingly product-focused agenda.
Sam Altman has a pretty simple succession plan for OpenAI: Hand off the company to an AI model. If the goal is for artificial intelligence to become so advanced that it can run companies, he asks, then why not his own? “I would never stand in the way of that,” he says. “I should… pic.twitter.com/qZ3ytjUkoB
I struck up a conversation with the woman sitting next to me at lunch. She turned out to be 93. It's not often you can compliment someone by saying they look 80.
This is a proven format and an excellent idea: 59 Seconds With Shilpa Shetty | Curly Tales #shortshttps://t.co/q7i4RPH2IS Can I get involved? In the background? Editorial, scouting, etc.
"Road to Ukraine Peace Runs Through India." – Peter Navarro
For once, Peter Navarro—famously nicknamed “the economist in the White House basement” (see The Drum Report: Markets, Tariffs, and the Man in the Basement)—has said something that actually makes sense, but only if you interpret it in a way he never intended.
Military vs. Political Solutions
There are only two categories of solutions to war: political and military. Economic sanctions belong in the military category—they are bets that the adversary will eventually run out of money, leaving them unable to fight.
The United States has an array of weapons it can provide to Ukraine if it insists on a military path. But the notion that sanctions on a country like Russia (or on India or China for trading with it) could end the war is absurd. Unlike sanctions on smaller states such as North Korea or Iran, targeting global giants distorts the entire international order.
Consider the realities:
China buys more oil from Russia than India does. Even if India stopped, China would continue.
The United States itself imports more uranium from Russia than India does, funding Moscow’s war effort.
Europe buys more Russian natural gas than anyone else, directly sustaining Russia’s revenues.
Clearly, the arithmetic doesn’t compute. The U.S. is not really saying “India, stop buying Russian oil and the war will end.” What Washington is really trying to say—without openly admitting it—is: India, please help.
India’s Untapped Role
History provides a clue. During Operation Sindoor, India decisively dominated the skies over Pakistan. Within hours, Islamabad reached out to Washington, which in turn reached out to New Delhi. India, seeking peace, offered a ceasefire via direct military-to-military talks. The war stopped before it could spiral.
The U.S. wants India to do something similar with Russia and Ukraine. Washington and Europe are not neutral—they are financing Ukraine’s war effort with money, weapons, and logistics. China is not neutral either—Kyiv sees Beijing tilting toward Moscow.
Only India has the credibility and relationships to act as a genuine broker. Yet India has been strangely hesitant, almost shy, about stepping up. That reluctance is disappointing. India is not just a regional power; this is its opportunity to show it can be a world power.
The Political Roadmap
The first principle India must hammer home is simple: there is no military solution. Delaying the political settlement through battlefield escalation only prolongs the suffering, at immense cost in blood and treasure.
What would the political roadmap look like?
Fresh Mandate for Zelensky
Ukraine’s president must pledge to seek a renewed democratic mandate, including on constitutional reforms. His current tenure has already lapsed, and legitimacy requires a vote.
Removing the NATO Clause
Ukraine should campaign to remove the NATO membership clause from its constitution. Having it guarantees nothing; removing it prevents nothing. NATO membership may or may not come decades later—but the clause today only prolongs war.
Federalizing Ukraine
Ukraine should transform from a unitary state to a federal one, granting autonomy and cultural rights to its regions. Russian should become the second official language of government.
Referenda in Disputed Territories
Disputed regions should be offered a choice, via UN-supervised referenda: remain within a federal Ukraine, become independent states, or join Russia.
Once Ukraine takes these steps, India’s foreign minister can engage Vladimir Putin directly. Both Russian and Ukrainian troops would withdraw at least 50 miles from contested zones, replaced by UN peacekeepers (including contingents from India and Nepal). Refugees would return, reconstruction would begin, and elections would follow within six months.
The United States, Europe, Russia, and China should jointly fund Ukraine’s rebuilding. Sanctions on Russia should be lifted incrementally as it fulfills each stage of the agreement, with full lifting upon recognition of referendum results.
Why India?
India is uniquely positioned to make this happen. Unlike the West, it is not a warring party. Unlike China, it is not seen as an adversary in Kyiv. Unlike Russia, it has credibility as a democratic partner.
Peace in Ukraine will not come from Washington, Brussels, or Beijing. It can—and should—come from New Delhi.
For once, Peter Navarro’s words make sense—but only if we deliberately misunderstand him.
The Road to Ukraine Peace Runs Through India: A Strategic Policy Paper
Executive Summary
The war in Ukraine has entered its most protracted and destructive phase. Western military support for Kyiv, Russian resilience under sanctions, and Chinese hedging have created a geopolitical deadlock. Traditional brokers — Washington, Brussels, Beijing — lack credibility across both Moscow and Kyiv. In this vacuum, India emerges as the only power with the diplomatic credibility, historical precedent, and geopolitical balance to mediate a sustainable peace.
This paper argues that India should not remain a passive observer. It must proactively pursue mediation, not for prestige alone but for global stability. We present a roadmap for Indian-led peace diplomacy, explore comparative scenarios, and highlight risks and opportunities.
I. The Global Impasse
1. Why Military Solutions Fail
Ukraine cannot militarily retake all disputed territories without catastrophic loss of life and destruction.
Russia cannot militarily subjugate Ukraine without unsustainable costs and permanent insurgency.
Sanctions have limited effect: Russia’s 2024–25 GDP contraction was shallow; energy revenues flowed via Asia.
2. The Limits of Western Mediation
The U.S. and EU are parties to the war — funding and arming Ukraine.
Russia views them as hostile actors, not impartial brokers.
China is perceived in Kyiv as tilted toward Moscow, disqualifying it as a neutral arbiter.
3. The Broken Sanctions Logic
Europe still buys Russian LNG.
The U.S. still buys Russian uranium.
China buys more Russian oil than India.
Targeting India for energy purchases is geopolitically incoherent.
II. Why India?
1. Strategic Positioning
Trusted by Russia: historic defense and energy ties.
Trusted by the West: growing strategic partnership with the U.S. and EU.
Accepted by Ukraine: India has not armed Russia, unlike Iran or North Korea.
2. Precedent: Operation Sindoor
India’s rapid escalation dominance over Pakistan forced external mediation through New Delhi.
Demonstrates India’s capacity to convert battlefield momentum into diplomatic leverage.
3. India’s Global Ambition
India aspires to be a “Vishwaguru” (teacher to the world) and permanent UNSC member.
Mediating Ukraine peace would demonstrate genuine global leadership.
III. The Indian Roadmap to Peace
Step 1: Hammering the Principle
India must clearly state: there is no military solution.
Shift narrative from “when Russia collapses” or “when Ukraine wins militarily” to political settlement.
Step 2: Ukrainian Commitments
Fresh Mandate for Zelensky
Democratic legitimacy requires elections.
Campaign explicitly on constitutional reform.
Removing NATO Clause
NATO membership not realistic before 2045.
Clause inflames Russia, provides no security guarantees.
Federalization of Ukraine
Regional autonomy, linguistic and cultural rights.
Russian as co-official government language.
Referenda in Disputed Territories
UN-supervised.
Choices: remain in federal Ukraine, independence, or join Russia.
Step 3: Russian Commitments
Withdraw troops at least 50 miles from contested zones.
Accept UN peacekeepers from neutral states (India, Nepal).
Incremental sanctions relief tied to compliance.
Step 4: International Commitments
US/EU: Fund reconstruction.
Russia: Respect referendum outcomes.
China: Provide reconstruction financing.
India: Serve as lead mediator and guarantor.
IV. Comparative Scenarios
Scenario A: Western-Led Settlement
Unlikely due to lack of credibility with Moscow.
Risks: frozen conflict, continued sanctions regime, NATO–Russia hostility entrenched.
Scenario B: China-Led Settlement
Viewed in Kyiv as pro-Russian.
Risks: imbalance in Eurasian security, marginalization of the West, weak enforcement.
Scenario C: Indian-Led Settlement (Preferred)
Seen as neutral yet powerful.
Risks: failure could damage India’s reputation.
Benefits: global prestige, seat at top diplomatic tables, enhanced role in UN reform.
V. Risks and Challenges
Domestic Politics in Ukraine
Zelensky may resist elections during war.
Nationalists oppose constitutional reform.
Russian Calculations
Putin may seek maximalist goals unless offered sanctions relief.
Western Skepticism
Washington may distrust Indian mediation as “soft on Russia.”
India’s Own Hesitation
New Delhi has historically avoided “grand mediation” roles.
VI. Policy Recommendations
For India
Appoint a Special Envoy for Ukraine Peace — a respected statesman with cross-party credibility.
Engage Both Sides Quietly First — establish trust through Track-II channels before going public.
Frame Mediation as Humanitarian, Not Geopolitical — focus on refugee return, reconstruction, and lives saved.
Propose an “India Peace Package” at the UN General Assembly.
For the U.S. and EU
Publicly welcome Indian mediation.
Signal willingness to lift sanctions in stages.
Finance reconstruction via a Marshall Plan-style fund.
For Russia
Accept UN peacekeepers from non-Western states.
Signal willingness to honor referendum outcomes.
For Ukraine
Commit to federalization and constitutional reform.
Seek legitimacy through elections.
VII. Conclusion
The Ukraine war will not end on the battlefield. It will end at the negotiating table. The world needs a broker who is:
Not a combatant (like the West)
Not tilted (like China)
Not isolated (like Russia itself)
That broker is India.
For decades, India has balanced its non-aligned heritage with its growing global responsibilities. Now is the time to translate rhetoric into reality. By leading peace diplomacy in Ukraine, India can prove it is more than a regional power — it is a global one.
The road to peace in Ukraine runs through New Delhi.
14/ If India delivers peace in Ukraine, it will finally claim its place as a true global power. The road to Ukraine peace runs through New Delhi. ๐ฎ๐ณ
