Pages

Showing posts with label Protest. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Protest. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 10, 2025

Trump vs. Newsom: The 2028 Showdown Begins in the Shadows



Trump vs. Newsom: The 2028 Showdown Begins in the Shadows

The 2028 presidential race may still be years away, but in American politics, the future has a habit of arriving early—and loud. As of mid-2025, the stage is already being set for a showdown that is equal parts symbolic and seismic: Trump vs. Newsom. Only, in a twist worthy of modern political theater, Donald Trump may not even be eligible to run.

And yet, his shadow looms large. So large, in fact, that it seems to have summoned his opposite number into the ring before any formal declarations have been made. Gavin Newsom, the high-profile, camera-comfortable governor of California, appears poised to inherit a strange role: the protagonist in a race that Trump himself may legally be excluded from—but still dominates in spirit.

A Vacuum of Opposition

What’s striking is not just the early start to the political maneuvering but the strange nature of it. Trump has always thrived on opposition—he is at his strongest when fighting someone, or something. But in a Democratic Party that’s still recalibrating itself post-Biden, there hasn’t been a clear foil. That vacuum may have tempted Trump to all but conjure his next opponent into being.

By stepping into policy battles—on immigration, on crime, on state rights—Newsom hasn’t just defended California’s values; he’s stepped into a national spotlight where contrast is the currency. With sharp words, televised debates, and state-level policies that defy Trumpian logic, Newsom has become the natural, if unofficial, rival. If this were a comic book, the villain has chosen his hero.

10th Amendment Politics: The States Strike Back

What’s unfolding isn’t just a clash of personalities. It’s a structural tension baked into the very DNA of American governance. The 10th Amendment—the one that reserves powers not delegated to the federal government for the states—has become the quiet battlefield for this emerging contest.

Law and order? That’s a state and local matter. But Trump and his ideological allies have increasingly leaned into federal overreach to impose their vision. Just like his past forays into trade policy and tariffs—also outside clear-cut federal authority—Trump's allies now find themselves in court, defending actions that blur constitutional lines. The irony is thick: a movement that claims to revere the Constitution seems endlessly eager to test its limits.

And it’s happening again. Legal scholars, state attorneys general, and constitutional watchdogs are preparing for a storm of litigation. These cases aren’t about policy in the abstract—they’re about who gets to wield power and how. The very mechanics of the union are on the table.

A Legal Grey Zone with Political Red Lines

What’s most telling is that the legal grey zone Trump often inhabits is now becoming a litmus test for political legitimacy. An administration or faction that frames itself as “law and order” may increasingly find that it is the law—and the courts—that check its ambitions.

These are not isolated skirmishes. They are the prelude to a broader ideological war: authoritarian impulse versus decentralized democracy. In that narrative, Newsom becomes more than a governor. He becomes a stand-in for a vision of America where local governance, civil liberties, and constitutional balance still matter.

The Real Contest Has Begun

So, is this the beginning of Trump vs. Newsom? In a sense, yes. Even if Trump’s name never appears on a ballot again, his ideas, followers, and legal entanglements will define the political arena. And in stepping into this storm, Newsom is doing more than positioning himself for a presidential run—he’s answering a summons from history.

Call it pre-election jockeying. Call it constitutional chess. But don’t mistake the quiet months of 2025 for peace. The next great battle for the American soul is already underway—and the protagonists are beginning to take the stage.

Whether it's fought in courtrooms, campaign stops, or state capitols, one thing is clear: Trump vs. Newsom is less about two men and more about two futures. And the first shots have already been fired.




Saturday, March 19, 2011

Syria's Turn

(en) Syria Location (he) ืžื™ืงื•ื ืกื•ืจื™ื”Image via Wikipedia
New York Times: In Syria, Crackdown After Protests: Protests broke out in four Syrian cities on Friday, the first large-scale demonstrations here since the pro-democracy uprisings began in the Arab world three months ago. Brutal police crackdowns followed, leaving six people dead and scores injured..... In the largest protests, several thousand people gathered in the center of Dara’a, in southern Syria, chanting “God, Syria and freedom only” ..... A Facebook page, “the Syrian revolution 2011,” has called on people to protest against corruption and repression. ..... Small protests in the capital on Tuesday and Wednesday were violently dispersed by the authorities, who arrested scores of demonstrators. The state news service, SANA, dismissed those protests as the work of outside agitators. ..... about 20 youths who had written graffiti complaining about the high cost of living and calling for more freedoms...... “They used live ammunition immediately, no tear gas or anything else”
Democracy in Syria, as in Yemen, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia or Libya, or in Iran, is not Britain's business, it is not the business of France, it is most definitely not the business of the United States of America. But when the people rise and take to the streets to peacefully protest, if any actor, any entity, any apparatus, any organization, any state structure, or mafia group, or a terrorist group, or a clan, or royal family, or an army, or a police force decides to unleash animal brutality upon those peaceful protesters, not just the US or Britain or France, but the entire community of nations on the planet has to stand up for them, and there are many, many nonviolent options. You impose global travel bans on all members of the regime, you freeze their assets, you issue strict warnings of vocal support, you extend moral support, you offer logistical support, maybe they need a few laptops, a few camera phones, medical supplies perhaps, and you give the offenders a little time, all the time making it absolutely clear unleashing animal brutality is not acceptable, and of course you press charges against them in the International Criminal Court, and you issue Interpol warrants for their arrests. And if they don't stop still, then you go to the UN Security Council for the final act. That final act still fits the definition of non violence. The violence against Hitler's regime fit the definition of non violence.

Or some monarchs in the region could do the smart thing and not unleash animal brutality upon their people and request that they be turned into constitutional monarchs. That is a legitimate option. But that is not an option still on the table after you have unleashed animal brutality upon peaceful protesters.

2011 is to be democracy's biggest year in world history. China itself is fair game. Russia is fair game. And the fuck with Mugabe.
a map of the Arab WorldImage via Wikipedia
Khalifa Of Bahrain Must Go
The Two Abdullahs Need To Go
The Response To Benghazi Has To Be In Tripoli
The Military Options
Yemen, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia
Barack Obama: My Man
Barack Obama Proved Me Wrong On Race And Libya
Don't Let Benghazi Fall
Gaddafi Just Did The Bin Laden Thing: He Threatened America
Democracy's Despair
North Korea In Sight
Secretary Hillary
John Kerry Has The Solution
No Fly Zone Or Massacre
Saudi Arabi Next
Talk to Jazeera: Saif al-Islam Gaddafi
The Anatomy Of Revolutions For Democracy

Friday Prayer: Let A Million Libyans March In Tripoli
Democracy With Lowest Possible Losses Of Human Lives
Gaddafi Is No Simon Bolivar
No Fly Zone Or Surgical Strikes
If Gaddafi Is Not President, It Should Be Easier For Him To Leave
Sound Military Options
Nicaragua, Ortega On The Radar
Make Surgical Strikes, Take The Guy Out
Kick Ortega Out
The Fuck With Mugabe
The Chinese Communist Party Can Keep The Power If They Agree To Pluralism, Federalism
This Is Also About Women's Rights
The Saudi King Is No Exception, He Has To Go Too
Democracy: An Israeli Plot?
China: 2 PM, Sunday
Bomb Gaddafi's Tent
Khameini, Gaddafi, Caecescu
Et Tu, China?
When They Open Fire
Iran: Brute Force Does Have An Answer
Iran, Bahrain and Yemen, Jordan, Syria, Libya, Saudi Arabia
Arab Democracy: What The US Needs To Do: Stay Deeply Engaged
Arab Dictators Are Shaking
Egypt: A Revolution, Not A Reform Movement
How Many People Could Mubarak Kill?
Arab Dictators Will Fall Like A House Of Cards
Enhanced by Zemanta