Pages

Tuesday, July 01, 2025

Makeup In U.S. Politics—Tracing From Nixon’s TV Debacle To Trump’s Signature Orange Visage

Obama and Bush Unite in Rare Move Against Trump Former presidents Barack Obama and George W. Bush have joined forces to shoot down President Trump’s “colossal mistake” to shutter the U.S. Agency for International Development. ....... The Trump administration cut around 90 percent of USAID’s foreign aid contracts during Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) rampage back in February. Musk oversaw the depletion of the workforce from 10,000 to less than 300. ....... The agency will be absorbed by the state department, where it will be replaced by a new organization called America First........ Singer and activist Bono got in on the act, too. He recited a poem, specially written for the occasion, telling the crowd: “They called you crooks/When you were the best of us.” ........ a study published in The Lancet medical journal claims that USAID cuts could lead to 14 million avoidable deaths by 2030. ....... The study surmised that the agency had already prevented the deaths of more than 91 million people, many of them children.


Makeup In U.S. Politics—Tracing From Nixon’s TV Debacle To Trump’s Signature Orange Visage 

🎙️ The Power of the Camera: Nixon vs. Kennedy, 1960

On September 26, 1960, Vice President Richard Nixon faced Senator John F. Kennedy in the first-ever televised presidential debate. Under bright studio lights, Nixon, freshly out of the hospital, refused makeup. The result? Pallid skin, visible sweat, and a gray suit that nearly blended into the backdrop, making him look unwell and unrelatable (doctorzebra.com, en.wikipedia.org).

Contrast that with JFK: well-composed, tanned, confident—and camera-ready. Nixon’s own mother called after the debate, worried he was ill (en.wikipedia.org).

Kennedy won the visual battle—at least among TV viewers—a critical strike in one of the closest elections in modern history (Kennedy edged Nixon by just 0.17% in the popular vote) (en.wikipedia.org). After this, the lesson was clear: in televised politics, looking the part matters—often more than what’s being said.

💄 Trump’s Signature “Orange” Look

Fast forward to the 21st century: Donald Trump’s distinctive orange‑tan has become emblematic of his public image. Observers and makeup artists speculate that he applies heavy tanning products and foundation to project energy, strength, and a healthy appearance across countless televised events and intense lighting (kansasreflector.com).

  • 🤔 Why the heavy makeup? With over a decade in the public eye—including reality TV and political campaigns—Trump likely relies on makeup to maintain a consistent look under varied lighting, conceal signs of aging, and portray vitality (kansasreflector.com).

  • 🧴 What does he use? According to stylists, it’s a mix of spray tan, thick foundation, and possibly on-camera makeup. Articles even reference CHI Helmet Head spray and Just For Men dye to maintain coverage and the iconic hue (thetimes.co.uk).

  • 📸 How much? Massive—Trump’s look suggests a heavy, full-coverage routine designed to withstand studio lights, cameras, and intense scrutiny . Reddit makeup artists note it's unusually overdone and poorly matched to his natural skin tone .

  • 🔁 Has it always been like this? The “orange” aesthetic became widely noticed during his reality show years (early 2000s), then became entrenched through the 2010s during his presidential runs (kansasreflector.com). So yes—it’s been consistent for well over a decade.

🧠 Lessons from Nixon to Trump

  1. Appearance influences perception
    Nixon’s lack of makeup cost him votes; Trump’s make-up artistry is meant to avoid that pitfall—even if it sometimes backfires visually.

  2. Televised presence is as strategic as speech
    Nixon’s makeup refusal proved disastrous under new media norms. Trump embraced—and amplified—his image, shaping a visual brand as much as a political one (time.com, civicsforlife.org).

  3. Makeup in politics is metaphoric
    Beyond aesthetics, it reflects a candidate’s understanding of stagecraft—Trump with “MAGA glam,” Nixon with his aversion. Both used image choices to send messages, whether intentionally or not.

💬 Final Takeaway

Makeup in politics isn’t superficial—it’s strategic. Nixon’s televised stumble taught campaigns that neglecting image could cost votes. Trump’s bombastic, orange tone doubles as skin-care and show-business branding, signaling youthfulness, stamina, and theatricality—at times overtly so.

Whether you think it’s vanity—or political weaponry—one thing is clear: makeup matters. And in the age of 24/7 media, the face you present often speaks louder than your words.

Curious about other political appearances or how current candidates use image strategies? Leave a comment. 

Grounded Greatness: The Case For Smart Surface Transit In Future Cities
The Garden Of Last Debates (novel)
Deported (novel)
Empty Country (novel)
Trump’s Default: The Mist Of Empire (novel)
The 20% Growth Revolution: Nepal’s Path to Prosperity Through Kalkiism
Rethinking Trade: A Blueprint for a Just and Thriving Global Economy
The $500 Billion Pivot: How the India-US Alliance Can Reshape Global Trade
Trump’s Trade War
Peace For Taiwan Is Possible
Formula For Peace In Ukraine
A 2T Cut
Are We Frozen in Time?: Tech Progress, Social Stagnation
The Last Age of War, The First Age of Peace: Lord Kalki, Prophecies, and the Path to Global Redemption
AOC 2028: : The Future of American Progressivism

at
Labels: , , , ,

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)