Friday, October 18, 2013
Friday, October 11, 2013
Tuesday, September 10, 2013
The Russia Idea On Syria Has To Be Carried Out Through The UN
English: Flag of Syria, from 1932-58 and 1961-63. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
Some good will come out of the exercise. One, war will be avoided. Two, the UN will gain currency. Three, this will hopefully lead to a ceasefire in Syria and a political solution to the grave crisis in that country.
Related articles
- Russia urges Syria to give up chemical weapons
- France to Draft Resolution Implementing Russian Plan for Syria's Chemical Weapons
- Syria Accepts Russian Chemical Arms Proposal
- Obama: Russia's proposal for Syria a potential 'positive development'
- This plan to rid Syria of chemical weapons is a cardboard proposal
- Why would China and Russia veto a security council resolution on Syria?
- Russia Proposes Way Out for Syria
- Russia's Syria disarmament plan gathers pace
- Russia's Blurred Lines With Syria
- Syria Accepts Russian Chemical Weapons Plan by Aljazeera
Monday, September 09, 2013
Kerry's Proposal Is A Good One
English: SOCHI. With President of Syria Bashar al-Assad. Русский: СОЧИ, БОЧАРОВ РУЧЕЙ. С Президентом Сирии Башаром Асадом. (Photo credit: Wikipedia) |
Other than the weapon, a few good things about the move would be that one, maybe Assad will agree to a ceasefire and a political solution, and two, it is a good thing that Russia and the US are cooperating.
The tech community feels differently about Snowden than does DC. The nation state is in a clash with the Internet. The Internet has a libertarian bent to it. So the Russia-Snowden affair is not all that black and white.
If Assad will agree to hand over his chemical weapons, maybe Assad will also agree to a political solution that will start with an all round ceasefire to bring the mindless killings to an end. But then the roadmap has to lead to elections to a constituent assembly, to start with a caretaker interim government. Or am I asking too much?
Related articles
- Russia and Syria Like John Kerry's 'Rhetorical' Idea for Averting War
- Vladimir Putin Puts John Kerry In Check On Syria
- Syria: Lavrov Checkmates Kerry Over Offhand Remark
- Kerry Proves Obama Administration Wants War, No Matter What
- US, Russia call on Syria to put chemical weapons under international control ... and Syria says okay
- US weighs talk of Syria dumping chemical weapons
- Russia calls on Syria to hand over chemical weapons
- Syria welcomes proposal on chemical weapons
- Are The Russians About To Outsmart Obama And Kerry On Syria?
- Syria Welcomes Russian Proposal to Hand Over Chemical Weapons: A Diplomatic Opening or a Head-Fake?
Friday, September 06, 2013
Syria: The Most Important Move Is Still Political
Barack Obama can strike if he wants to, and he does want to strike. He could rain 100 million dollars worth of missiles, or he could rain two billion dollars worth of missiles. He has leeway to decide. There will be no American troops on the ground. None are needed.
But the biggest challenge is not all that. That part is done. The biggest challenge is political and it has to do with the Syrian opposition.
The Obama administration has to make a clear case to the Syrian opposition in exile. They have to get their act together. That means cobbling together a united opposition. That means agreeing to an interim president in waiting. Who is that candidate? That means agreeing to elections to a constituent assembly within a year of Assad getting toppled. That means only inviting those groups into the coalition that will agree to lay down their arms once Assad is out.
The transition will have to be smooth. The post-Assad regime ironically will have to secure all the chemical weapons as the first order of business, that and any other weapons of mass destruction.
Unless the Syrian opposition is willing to all this political homework, the Obama administration should attempt only a limited strike, enough to punish Assad but not enough to hand over Syria to the Al Qaeda. The Obama administration has to do all it can - and there is much it can do - to push the Syrian opposition to do all the necessary political homework. Why strike if you are not going to get rid of Assad? We are not attempting a fireworks display.
Related articles
- U.S. Action Against Syria Will Have 'Some Teeth,' Includes Arming the Rebels
- Did the White House Help Plan the Syrian Chemical Attack?
- 25 essential quotes about the coming war with Syria that every American should see
- Article cited by Limbaugh on Syrian chemical attack being a U.S. false flag
- Hadley Says Republicans Should Back Obama on Syria Strike
- Many in Middle East struggling to understand Obama's Syria policy
- Syria strikes: Senate committee approves resolution in boost for Obama
- AIPAC finally appears on the syria war hawk horizon, but then gets edited out again
- Syria strikes: Senate committee approves resolution in boost for Obama
Tuesday, September 03, 2013
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)