Why Trump Could Lose His Trade War With China I’m in Denmark’s Parliament. Here’s Why America Has Us So Stunned. a few weeks ago, when Vice President JD Vance said Denmark is “not being a good ally” to the United States.......... Danes were stunned and stung. Our country has been nothing less than a stalwart ally of America. Many of us felt as if we were losing a longtime friend — almost as if a brother were abandoning us: The United States has been Denmark’s closest ally for 80 years. We have followed American presidents into wars that many Danes felt were not ours to fight. ........ The only time Article 5 has been invoked was on Sept. 12, 2001. Less than 24 hours after the terrorist attacks on the United States, its European and Canadian allies stood up to assist Americans........
Denmark lost roughly as many service members per capita in Afghanistan as the United States did.
........... It took a war on our continent to make us realize that peace can never be taken for granted. Since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, Denmark has been the second-largest donor of weapons and support to Ukraine as a share of G.D.P. and among the largest donors in total. Today, Denmark invests over 2 percent of our G.D.P. in defense — above the NATO guideline — and in 2025 and 2026, we will spend more than 3 percent. ........... When it comes to the military defense of the Arctic, NATO acknowledges that it is a shared responsibility. ............ In the post-World War II era, there were over a dozen American military installations in Greenland. Today only one American base remains, with around 150 permanent personnel — the Pituffik Space Base, which Mr. Vance recently visited. The Danish military presence is not robust, either. But as Mr. Rasmussen said last month in a post on X: “We respect that the United States needs a greater military presence in Greenland,” and “we, Denmark and Greenland, are very much open to discussing this.” Denmark has just decided to increase spending on Arctic security by more than $2 billion. America is welcome to increase its investment, too. We can even do it together. ............ “When you demand to take over a part of the Kingdom of Denmark’s territory — when we are met by pressure and by threats from our closest ally — what are we to believe about the country that we have admired for so many years? The country that, if any, has stood up for others’ freedom. You know us, you know what we stand for, and you know that we don’t give in.”
It’s Not Hard to Imagine a Chinese-Led Global Economy Who wins the trade war? Every time you think you understand the state of play, President Trump simply flips the game board. The result: American economic uncertainty is now off the charts, registering highs well past the peak of pandemic panic. Economists are expecting a recession, automakers are already rolling through layoffs, and fund managers haven’t been so bearish on American assets in decades. The stock market looks more and more like a meme coin, heading for a possible rug pull, and the president looks like someone who simply enjoys inflicting pain on almost anyone while unable to feel any of it himself. .............. Last week Spain’s democratic-socialist government proudly announced plans to intensify relations with China, after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned that doing so would amount to “cutting your own throat.” President Emmanuel Macron of France urged European companies to stop investing in the United States, and the European Union as a whole, which is developing a retaliatory tariff response and plotting potential tax increases on American tech companies, announced it is sending a delegation to Beijing in July. It is now sending trade negotiators here with burner phones, as it did when negotiating there, and E.U. officials are declaring the entire trans-Atlantic alliance dead in the pages of The Financial Times. Canada’s prime minister, Mark Carney, who may emerge from this month’s elections as the new face of global liberalism, declared the eight-decade-old economic order — on which the modern American empire was built — simply “over.” .................
Tourist travel from Canada is down more than 70 percent
......... From many countries in Europe, it’s down around 30 percent. ........
in the single week since “Liberation Day,” exports from the United States dropped by almost one-third; imports to the United States fell by nearly two-thirds.
............ When Trump embarked on his trade war, it was intended as a performance of global dominance, but what he is showing us looks more like a Little America. (Build the wall, indeed.) ...........
China commands global trade ..... the tariffs will only add to the lead — pushing many more countries to work more with China and less with America.
............ 30 percent of American trading partners would fully recover from even total cessation of U.S. trade within one year; within five years, more than half would. ........... Twenty-five years ago, eight out of 10 countries in the world conducted more trade with the United States than with China. Today seven out of 10 count China as their larger trade partner. .................. China’s share of global manufacturing has grown so much that by 2030, it is expected to reach seven times what it was in 2000; America’s will have fallen by half. And while Trump’s supporters describe the trade war as an effort to reverse that pattern, they’ve done so little beyond erratic tariffs — with no major pledges of government investment and no real commitment to policy stability — it all looks more like policy by culture-war meme. ............ The country is now routinely installing as much solar power as the rest of the world combined while producing 90 percent of the world’s solar panels and more than three-quarters of its electric batteries. ........... Chinese spending on university and government research had surpassed that in the United States, even before Trump declared war on the country’s elite universities. And then along came Elon Musk and his so-called Department of Government Efficiency to reduce the American budget by billions of dollars and Immigration and Customs Enforcement to deport international students here on visas or with green cards. ............ As recently as 2010, China produced a truly negligible part of the world’s medicine; now it is the world’s second-biggest developer of new drugs, and from 2020 to 2024, the value of drugs licensed worldwide from China grew fifteenfold .......... The country has surpassed Europe and the United States in the number of high-quality scientific papers published and has opened up leads in materials science, engineering, chemistry and computer science — all domains in which China is responsible for more than 60 percent of cutting-edge research. These seem like important fields. ........... For most of Trump’s second term, an electric-car billionaire has been at least the second-most-powerful man in government, but Tesla’s stock price has fallen by nearly half since December, with liberal backlash in America and sales in European countries falling almost 50 percent compared with last year. China’s electric vehicle powerhouse, BYD, meanwhile, expects sales in Europe to double in 2025, having grown its global sales almost 15 times over since 2020. “The first China shock was when China was incorporating into our supply chains,” the economic historian Adam Tooze proclaimed in November. “The second China shock is when we beg to be incorporated into theirs.”
“The resistance libs were mostly right about him.”
........ “We wanted a swift, lean government that stopped strangling innovation and infrastructure. Instead we got chain-saw-style firings, total devastation of state capacity in exactly the way most likely to strangle innovation more than ever, and the worst and dumbest people in the world gloating about how they solved the ‘grift’ of sending lifesaving medications to dying babies.” ........ A term of high praise on the dissident right is “based,” short for “based in reality.” But never has an administration been more divorced from reality, and more determined to shove insulting ideological fictions down our throats, than Trump’s. ............... When liberalism was firmly entrenched, its discontents could treat authoritarian ideas as interesting avant-garde provocations. Authoritarianism in power, however, was always going to be crude and stupid. ........... Trump’s tariffs have pushed some to the breaking point because they reveal the immediate material cost of that stupidity. The decadent cynics of the new right could dismiss Trump’s lies about the 2020 election as mere hyperbole. It’s harder to be sanguine about a collapse in one’s own net worth and economic prospects. ............ When she looks back on the milieu she was once a part of, she said, she sees no solid ideas for a post-liberal society — it was all just aesthetics, resentments and vibes. “And now the vibes have knocked into reality,” she said. “And it is so jarring to see that none of the vibes stand up to scrutiny. None of the vibes actually fit onto the 21st century. None of the vibes, if implemented, would lead to anything but immiseration and war.”
The vibe is shifting yet again. The cumulative IQ of the right is looking worse than the market.
If I'd known that MAGA would become a poverty cult obsessed with bringing Chinese sweatshops to the US, I would have supported DEI Kamala. However, as far as I am aware, no one (including Karlin) anticipated…
"It is still theoretically possible to turn this around. The Republican-controlled Congress should invoke the 25th Amendment, carry Trump away in a straitjacket, revoke the tariffs, and spend their political capital (which would be soaring) on important issues like deporting illegal aliens. But this is the kind of action that would be taken by smart people, not Republicans."
This Is What Trumponomics Is Really About what is the purpose of Trumponomics? ....... In a word, reindustrialization. ........ Tariff-fueled nationalism is a callback to eras when industrial America reigned supreme. For a time during the 20th century, parts of Europe and Asia were rebuilding after two world wars, so U.S. factories thrived, and manufacturing provided upward mobility for millions of Americans.
To reindustrialize will require investment in people and machines — and a coherent strategy. Given the Trump administration’s aversion to collaboration and the internal contradictions of the factions within the administration, its reindustrialization drive appears disconnected from reality and destined to fail. ......... Mr. Trump has been skeptical about global trade for decades. In 1987 he took out an ad in a newspaper warning that “for decades, Japan and others have been taking advantage of the United States.”
‘Simply Bad Business’: Corporate Gloom Rises Over Trump’s Tariffs Global markets are bouncing back, but a new survey of company chiefs finds that they’re on edge and are looking to cut back on investment. James Carville: How to Turn Trump’s Economic Chaos Against Him The problem is that smoke and mirrors only work until you screw up so hard that no act of lunacy can pull the American people’s attention elsewhere. And boy, did the president just screw up royally. ......... In what will certainly be recorded as one of the most ignorant acts of political leadership in American history, the president of the United States has now willfully damaged the global economy with his tariff chaos. Not only was this an act of economic warfare, it has broken the cardinal rule in American politics: Never destabilize the economy. With it, the Trump administration is causing enormous damage to itself — and there can be no more distraction from this naked truth. ............ Now, Democrats have an opportunity to allow the Republicans to edge closer to collapse as the party in full control of Washington — let’s please not become the story again and get in their way. .......... Prices could rise sharply, consumer spending may well dry up and we are already seeing evidence of surging mortgage rates and a weakened bond market. The Trump administration will not be competent enough to dig us out. The path to stabilizing and strengthening the country starts when Democrats can take back the economic narrative from the Republican Party and persuade the majority of Americans to close the book on the Trump chaos. ............. focus on the economic foundations that matter to Americans most. My fellow Democrats, it’s time we transform our party into a projector for the economic pain of the American people. ............ President Trump won the White House on an overt promise to bring down prices. Let’s not forget his most oft-repeated claims: “Starting on Day 1, we will end inflation and make America affordable again, to bring down the prices of all goods” or: “Prices will come down. You just watch. They’ll come down, and they’ll come down fast, not only with insurance, with everything.” ........... The cost of trucks and vehicles is set to shoot up thousands of dollars. .......... The most direct hit to working people’s pocketbooks will always be from the cost of daily goods. Making it clear that Mr. Trump and the Republicans willingly broke this promise should be in every ad, every podcast talking point, every message we send from now until the midterms. ........ it’s not about the stock market, it’s about 401(k)s. With six in 10 Americans lacking the savings to cover even a $1,000 emergency expense, Democrats cannot afford to hinge our economic narrative on the rise and fall of a market for the privileged. ........... the tariffs are a poison dagger for those who have saved and vested into their 401(k) their entire lives, just to see it depleted by the reckless actions of the president. ............. You can bet certain retirees are now living in a panic, pausing home renovations and big-ticket purchases as their life savings start to drain by the day. If this continues, many retirees will have to go back into the work force, spending what should be their comfortable years grinding in the office as if they are in their 30s. This is a real, substantial pain that will be felt by the Americans who are the least deserving of it.
As it turns out, older voters are also some of the most reliable, powering Trump’s re-election.
Democrats, uplift their stories and connect their pain to the president. Do not focus on the market or the daily percentage drop in the Magnificent Seven tech stocks. .......... Record the story of Nicholas Gilbert, a dairy farmer upended by the tariffs — and localize it to Wisconsin. Focus on the Latino and Black men who supported his previous election, and take it to Georgia or Arizona. Go on influencer networks and podcasts talking about the looming increase in car prices and the fact that the president exploded Nintendo’s plans for the Switch 2. .......... For the entirety of his tenure in American politics, Donald Trump for better or worse has lived on by the grace of the American people’s faith in his economic leadership.
Now it is plain and clear, just as with his failures in Atlantic City or with Trump University, that Mr. Trump never had any idea what he was doing all along.
I Have Never Been More Afraid for My Country’s Future For good measure, Trump added about these miners: “You could give them a penthouse on Fifth Avenue and a different kind of a job and they’d be unhappy. They want to mine coal; that’s what they love to do.” .............. when he singles out coal miners for praise while he tries to zero out development of clean-tech jobs from his budget — in 2023, the U.S. wind energy industry employed approximately 130,000 workers, while the solar industry employed 280,000 — it suggests that Trump is trapped in a right-wing woke ideology that doesn’t recognize green manufacturing jobs as “real” jobs. .......... Trump ran for another term not because he had any clue how to transform America for the 21st century. He ran in order to stay out of jail and to get revenge on those who, with real evidence, had tried to hold him accountable to the law. I doubt he has ever spent five minutes studying the work force of the future. ......... He then returned to the White House, his head still filled with ideas out of the 1970s. There he launched a trade war with no allies and no serious preparation — which is why he changes his tariffs almost every day — and no understanding of how much the global economy is now a complex ecosystem in which products are assembled from components from multiple countries. And then he has this war carried out by a commerce secretary who thinks millions of Americans are dying to replace Chinese workers “screwing in little screws to make iPhones.” ..........
this farce is about to touch every American.
By attacking our closest allies — Canada, Mexico, Japan, South Korea and the European Union — and our biggest rival, China, at the same time he makes clear he favors Russia over Ukraine and prefers climate-destroying energy industries over future-oriented ones, the planet be damned. Trump is triggering a serious loss of global confidence in America. ........... The world is now seeing Trump’s America for exactly what it is becoming: a rogue state led by an impulsive strongman disconnected from the rule of law and other constitutional American principles and values. ......... bond yields keep spiking and the dollar keeps weakening — classic signs of a loss of confidence that does not have to be large to have a large impact on our whole economy. .......... the European Union’s governing “commission is issuing burner phones and basic laptops to some U.S.-bound staff to avoid the risk of espionage, a measure traditionally reserved for trips to China.” It doesn’t trust the rule of law in America anymore. ........ I heard this repeatedly in China a few weeks ago — that maybe it’s not a good idea any longer to study in America. The reason: They don’t know when their kids might be arbitrarily arrested, when their family members might get deported to Salvadoran prisons. ......... somewhere out there, as you read this, is someone like Steve Jobs’s Syrian birth father, who came to our shores in the 1950s to get a Ph.D. at the University of Wisconsin, someone who was planning to study in America but is now looking to go to Canada or Europe instead. ......... You shrink all those things — our ability to attract the world’s most energetic and entrepreneurial immigrants, which allowed us to be the world’s center for innovation; our power to draw in a disproportionate share of the world’s savings, which allowed us to live beyond our means for decades; and our reputation for upholding the rule of law — and over time you end up with an America that will be less prosperous, less respected and increasingly isolated. ............ but isn’t China also still digging coal? Yes, it is, but with a long-term plan to phase it out and to use robots to do the dangerous and health-sapping work of miners. .......... While Trump is doing his “weave” — rambling about whatever strikes him at the moment as good policy — China is weaving long-term plans. ........... In 2015, a year before Trump became president, China’s prime minister at the time, Li Keqiang, unveiled a forward-looking growth plan called “Made in China 2025.” It began by asking, what will be the growth engine for the 21st century? Beijing then made huge investments in the elements of that engine’s components so Chinese companies could dominate them at home and abroad. We’re talking clean energy, batteries, electric vehicles and autonomous cars, robots, new materials, machine tools, drones, quantum computing and artificial intelligence. ........... China has become “the leading country globally for research output in the database in chemistry, earth and environmental sciences and physical sciences, and is second for biological sciences and health sciences.” ........... He is undermining our sacred rule of law, he is tossing away our allies, he is undermining the value of the dollar and he is shredding any hope of national unity. He’s even got Canadians now boycotting Las Vegas because they don’t like to be told we will soon own them. ...... If Trump doesn’t stop his rogue behavior, he’s going to destroy all the things that made America strong, respected and prosperous.
The Currency Stalemate: How U.S. and China’s Rigid Stands Threaten Global Economic Balance
The global financial system is caught in a quiet but profound tug-of-war. On one side is the United States, fiercely guarding the U.S. dollar’s status as the world’s dominant reserve currency. On the other is China, aggressively pushing for dedollarization without making the structural reforms necessary for the yuan to step into that role. Both nations are clinging to contradictory and ultimately self-defeating currency policies—and the rest of the world, especially the poorest countries, may pay the price.
The Dollar’s Double-Edged Sword
America has long benefited from the dollar’s position as the de facto global currency. It allows the U.S. to borrow at lower costs, run massive deficits, and print money with relatively low inflationary consequences. More than military might, diplomacy, or even GDP, this financial supremacy is the cornerstone of American global power.
But this “exorbitant privilege” comes with an economic trade-off: chronic trade deficits. When you export your currency—because the world needs dollars for trade and reserves—you inevitably import goods and services. This structural imbalance has hollowed out parts of U.S. industry and fueled political backlash, even as it underwrites the global financial system.
China’s Currency Conundrum
Meanwhile, China aspires to chip away at dollar dominance. Through initiatives like the Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS), the digital yuan, and trade deals settled in renminbi (RMB), Beijing is laying the groundwork for a multipolar currency world. But there’s a fundamental contradiction at the heart of China’s ambition: the yuan is not fully convertible.
Capital controls remain tight. The value of the yuan is managed, often kept artificially low to favor exports—a cornerstone of China’s economic rise. But this very strategy undermines global trust in the yuan as a freely usable international currency. Until China opens its capital account and allows the market to determine the RMB’s value, its global aspirations will remain largely symbolic.
The Global Impasse
What we’re witnessing is a global currency system trapped by two immovable giants:
The U.S. won’t sacrifice dollar dominance, even though it leads to unsustainable trade imbalances and financial vulnerabilities.
China won’t liberalize the yuan, even though it limits the currency’s international reach and credibility.
This stalemate creates volatility in emerging markets, limits monetary policy options for poorer countries, and perpetuates an unstable, lopsided global order. In a world increasingly marked by regional blocs and shifting trade alliances, this rigidity does not serve the interests of global stability.
A Call for Reform
If neither Washington nor Beijing is willing to move, perhaps it’s time for the rest of the world—especially the Global South—to push for a more balanced system. This could include:
Expanded use of Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) through the IMF.
Regional currency unions.
Multilateral payment systems independent of dollar or yuan hegemony.
A diversified reserve currency basket, rather than a single dominant currency.
The world is overdue for a new currency architecture—one that reflects a more multipolar, interconnected, and equitable global economy. But until the U.S. relinquishes some control and China embraces reform, the rest of the world remains caught in a financial no-man’s-land.
And that’s a recipe for continued instability—especially for those with the least margin for error.
China's Dedollarization Drive: A New Era of Currency Competition
The global financial landscape is undergoing a significant transformation as China intensifies its efforts to reduce reliance on the U.S. dollar—a process known as dedollarization. This movement is not solely about replacing the dollar but about reshaping international trade, finance, and geopolitical influence.
China's Dedollarization Strategy
China's dedollarization approach is multifaceted, aiming to:
Promote the Renminbi (RMB) in Global Trade: China is encouraging the use of its currency in international transactions, particularly with countries in the ASEAN region. In 2024, cross-border RMB settlements in ASEAN exceeded 5.8 trillion yuan, marking a 120% increase from 2021.
Develop Alternative Financial Systems: To reduce dependence on U.S.-dominated systems like SWIFT, China has established the Cross-Border Interbank Payment System (CIPS), facilitating RMB-denominated transactions.
Expand the Digital Yuan (e-CNY): China's central bank digital currency (CBDC) has seen substantial growth, with over 7 trillion yuan ($986 billion) in transactions by mid-2024. The digital yuan aims to enhance the RMB's global reach and offer an alternative to dollar-based digital payments.
Progress and Challenges
While China's dedollarization efforts have gained momentum, several challenges persist:
Limited Global Adoption: Despite growth, the RMB's share in global payments remains modest. As of 2023, it accounted for 4.3% of global payments, surpassing the Japanese yen but still trailing behind the U.S. dollar (47%) and the euro (23%).
Capital Controls: China's strict capital controls hinder the RMB's liquidity and its potential as a global reserve currency.
Trust and Transparency: Global investors often express concerns about China's regulatory environment and the transparency of its financial systems, which can deter widespread adoption of the RMB.
The Role of BRICS
The BRICS nations—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—are collectively exploring dedollarization strategies:
BRICS Pay: An initiative to develop a decentralized payment system facilitating transactions in local currencies, aiming to reduce reliance on the U.S. dollar and SWIFT.
Petroyuan Discussions: Russia has proposed denominating oil trades in yuan, a move that could challenge the dollar's dominance in energy markets.
Common Currency Considerations: While discussions about a unified BRICS currency exist, significant economic disparities and differing monetary policies among member nations make this a complex endeavor.
A Multipolar Currency Future?
The global financial system is gradually shifting towards a more multipolar structure: Diversification of Reserves: Countries are increasingly diversifying their foreign exchange reserves, reducing the proportion held in U.S. dollars.
Emergence of Regional Currencies: Currencies like the euro and the RMB are gaining traction in regional trade agreements and financial transactions.
Technological Advancements: The rise of digital currencies and blockchain technology is facilitating alternative payment systems, potentially reducing the dominance of traditional currencies. While the U.S. dollar remains the predominant global reserve currency, these developments indicate a gradual move towards a more diversified and multipolar currency landscape.
In conclusion, China's dedollarization efforts, bolstered by technological innovations and strategic alliances like BRICS, are reshaping the global financial order. While the transition to a multipolar currency system will be gradual and complex, the foundations for such a shift are increasingly evident.
Why Harvard Decided to Fight Trump The Trump administration will freeze over $2 billion in federal funds because Harvard refused to comply with a list of demands. Harvard leaders believed saying no was worth the risk. ........ Then, late on Friday night, the federal government sent Harvard a five-page fusillade of new demands that would reshape the school’s operations, admissions, hiring, faculty and student life...... It took less than 72 hours for Harvard to say no.......... the government swiftly retaliated with a freeze of more than $2.2 billion in federal funding. Nearly $7 billion more remains imperiled, including money that goes to Harvard’s affiliated hospitals. And on Tuesday, Mr. Trump — who has picked out elite universities, long accused by conservatives of leaning left, as a special target — threatened Harvard’s tax-exempt status. ......... Even for the world’s richest university, which has an endowment of about $53 billion, a lasting freeze would cut deeply into labs, departments and even classrooms. But officials at Harvard elected to prize its reputation, independence and legacy, wagering that the institution could outlast Mr. Trump’s crusade. .......
“This is what Joe McCarthy was trying to do magnified ten- or 100-fold,” said Lawrence H. Summers, a former Harvard president, adding that “it runs directly against the university’s role in a free society.”
....... The polite opening paragraphs gave way to a range of demands so broad and intrusive that they stunned Harvard leaders ....... The government wanted Harvard to “immediately shutter” any programs related to diversity, equity and inclusion and to bring in an outsider to examine “those programs and departments that most fuel antisemitic harassment or reflect ideological capture.” ......... “The university will not surrender its independence or relinquish its constitutional rights.” ......... plunged Harvard into one of the gravest confrontations in its history. ........ The university imposed a hiring freeze in March and has sought to raise $1.2 billion in the bond market. Harvard also weighed adjustments to the $53 billion endowment’s payouts, just as it had done during the pandemic. ........
......... Xi “can wait out the United States,” Nouriel Roubini, an economist and senior adviser at the hedge fund Hudson Bay Capital, told Bloomberg Television on Monday. “In the short term, China has a lot of leverage,” he added, including placing trade restrictions on companies like Apple and Tesla. ........ last week’s big loser — the dollar — was selling off again, hitting a six-month low and adding to U.S. importers’ concerns.
Andy Jassy, CEO of retail giant Amazon (AMZN), has already said its third-party sellers may “pass costs on” related to US President Donald Trump’s tariffs to customers.
Donald Trump's Approval Rating Suddenly Shifts President Donald Trump's approval rating has taken a surprising turn, with two new polls showing a sudden surge in support for the president...... the latest polls indicate that Trump may be recovering from the damage that his "Liberation Day" tariffs did to his popularity. ...... Some 41 percent said they had seen everyday prices go up as a result of the tariffs.
Game Theory and the U.S.-China Trade War: Who Blinks First?
As of April 2025, the U.S.-China trade war has escalated dramatically, with the U.S. imposing tariffs up to 245% on Chinese imports, prompting retaliatory measures from China. This tit-for-tat escalation has led to significant economic disruptions globally.
Applying game theory provides a structured lens to analyze this complex standoff.
The Trade War as a Strategic Game
In game theory, the U.S.-China trade conflict resembles a classic Prisoner's Dilemma, where both parties face the temptation to defect (impose tariffs) rather than cooperate (maintain free trade). This often results in a suboptimal outcome for both.
Additionally, the situation mirrors the Game of Chicken, where each side escalates threats, hoping the other will yield first. This risky strategy can lead to mutual destruction if neither side backs down.
Strategic Moves and Countermoves
United States:
Tariff Escalation: President Trump's administration has increased tariffs to 245% on Chinese goods.
Economic Pressure: The U.S. aims to leverage its market size to force concessions from China.
China:
Retaliatory Tariffs: China has imposed its own tariffs on U.S. goods, signaling its unwillingness to capitulate.
Diversification: China is strengthening trade ties within Asia and promoting domestic consumption to mitigate reliance on the U.S. market.
Who Has the Upper Hand?
While both economies are suffering, China's centralized governance and long-term planning may provide it with greater resilience. Conversely, the U.S. faces internal political pressures and market volatility, which could compel it to seek a resolution sooner.
Potential Outcomes
Mutual De-escalation: Both nations agree to roll back tariffs and negotiate a new trade agreement.
Prolonged Stalemate: The trade war continues, leading to sustained economic harm globally.
One Side Concedes: Under mounting pressure, either the U.S. or China makes significant concessions to end the conflict.
Conclusion
The U.S.-China trade war, when viewed through the lens of game theory, highlights the complexities of international negotiations where national interests and global economic stability are at stake. While both sides have strategic reasons to maintain their positions, the mutual benefits of cooperation suggest that a negotiated resolution would be the optimal outcome.
