Pages

Wednesday, June 18, 2025

Iran: Top Three Contenders for Interim Prime Minister

 






Predicting the top contenders for an interim prime minister in Iran following a hypothetical regime collapse is challenging due to the complex political landscape, the lack of a clear succession framework, and the absence of recent, reliable data on potential leaders in such a scenario. The current theocratic system, dominated by the Supreme Leader and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), suppresses open political competition, making it difficult to identify definitive candidates. However, based on historical patterns, opposition dynamics, and recent analyses of Iran's political environment, I can provide an informed speculative assessment. The response draws on available information about opposition figures, political factions, and potential coalitions, while critically examining the establishment narrative and avoiding unsupported assumptions.

Top Three Contenders for Interim Prime Minister
In the event of a regime collapse in Tehran, an interim prime minister would likely emerge from prominent opposition figures, exiled leaders, or reformist voices with domestic or international legitimacy. Below are three potential contenders, based on their prominence, influence, and ability to rally support:
  1. Reza Pahlavi
    • Background: The former Crown Prince of Iran, son of the last Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, and a prominent exile figure based in the United States. He has positioned himself as a leading voice for a secular, democratic Iran and enjoys significant support among the Iranian diaspora and monarchist groups.
    • Why a Contender?: Pahlavi has cultivated a public image as a unifying figure advocating for regime change and a return to secular governance. His international connections, including reported ties with Israel and Western governments, could bolster his candidacy in a transitional period. His visibility increased after his 2023 trip to Israel, where he met with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, signaling his alignment with anti-regime forces. However, his monarchist background may polarize domestic audiences, particularly among republicans and left-leaning groups.
    • Challenges: Pahlavi lacks a strong organizational base inside Iran, and his association with the pre-1979 monarchy could alienate younger generations and those wary of foreign-backed figures. His support is stronger abroad than domestically, and he faces criticism for not condemning certain Israeli actions, which could complicate his appeal in Iran.
  2. Masoud Pezeshkian
    • Background: The current President of Iran (elected in 2024), a reformist with a background as a heart surgeon and former parliamentarian. He has advocated for dialogue with the public and regional cooperation, emphasizing a less confrontational approach than his hardline predecessors.
    • Why a Contender?: If the regime collapses but elements of the current system remain influential (e.g., reformist factions or moderate IRGC elements), Pezeshkian could transition into an interim role due to his existing legitimacy as an elected official. His reformist stance, including promises to repair Iran’s social contract and engage with regional neighbors like Saudi Arabia, could make him a compromise candidate acceptable to both domestic moderates and international actors. His election in 2024 reflects some public support for reformist ideals, despite low voter turnout.
    • Challenges: Pezeshkian’s association with the current regime, even as a reformist, could taint his credibility among hardline opposition groups and protesters demanding total system change. His limited power under the Supreme Leader’s authority may also undermine his ability to project leadership in a post-regime scenario.
  3. Narges Mohammadi
    • Background: A prominent human rights activist and Nobel Peace Prize laureate, currently imprisoned in Tehran’s Evin Prison since 2014. She has been a vocal critic of the regime, advocating for democracy, women’s rights, and an end to authoritarian rule.
    • Why a Contender?: Mohammadi’s moral authority and international recognition make her a powerful symbol of resistance. Her 2025 op-ed, co-authored with other civil society figures, called for the resignation of the current leadership, signaling her potential to lead or inspire a transitional government. Her grassroots support, especially among women and youth inspired by the “Women, Life, Freedom” protests, could position her as a unifying figure for a broad coalition.
    • Challenges: Her imprisonment limits her ability to organize, and her lack of a formal political structure could hinder her transition to a leadership role. Additionally, her focus on human rights over political strategy might make it difficult to navigate the complex factionalism of a post-regime Iran.
Potential Coalitions
A post-regime interim government would likely require a coalition to stabilize the country and organize elections for a constituent assembly. The nature of such a coalition depends on the circumstances of the regime’s fall (e.g., popular uprising, military collapse, or external intervention). Based on current opposition dynamics, the following coalition scenarios are plausible:
  1. Secular-Democratic Coalition
    • Composition: This could include monarchists (led by Reza Pahlavi), reformists (e.g., figures aligned with Pezeshkian or former President Mohammad Khatami), and civil society activists (e.g., Narges Mohammadi). The coalition might also involve diaspora groups like the National Iranian American Council (NIAC) and secular intellectuals advocating for a non-theocratic state.
    • Strengths: Broad appeal among urban middle classes, youth, and the diaspora. It could gain international support from Western governments and align with calls for normalization with Israel.
    • Weaknesses: Internal divisions between monarchists and republicans, as seen in the collapse of the 2023 Alliance for Democracy and Freedom in Iran (ADFI), could undermine unity. Pahlavi’s leadership has been a point of contention, with figures like activist Hamed Esmaeilion distancing themselves from him.
  2. Ethnic and Regional Alliance
    • Composition: Ethnic opposition groups, such as the Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan (PDKI), the Cooperation Center of Iranian Kurdistan Parties, and Baluchi or Ahwazi Arab groups, could form a federalist coalition. These groups might align with secular democrats to push for a decentralized Iran.
    • Strengths: Strong regional support in Kurdish, Baluchi, and Arab areas, where distrust of Tehran is high. These groups have armed wings, like the PDKI’s Peshmerga, which could provide security during a transition.
    • Weaknesses: Risk of fragmentation, as urban middle classes may oppose federalism to preserve national unity, especially if Israel or other foreign powers back secessionist movements. Analyst Ali Alfoneh notes that historical patterns show urban Iranians rallying against separatism during crises.
  3. Reformist-Moderate Continuity Coalition
    • Composition: Elements of the current regime’s reformist wing (e.g., Pezeshkian, former President Hassan Rouhani) and moderate technocrats (e.g., Seyed Ali Madanizadeh, the new economy minister). This coalition might include pragmatic IRGC factions willing to negotiate a transition to retain influence.
    • Strengths: Continuity with existing institutions could minimize chaos and maintain bureaucratic functionality. It might appeal to conservatives wary of radical change.
    • Weaknesses: Likely to face resistance from hardline opposition groups and protesters who reject any remnants of the Islamic Republic. Low voter turnout in recent elections (e.g., 41% in 2024) indicates widespread distrust of reformists within the system.
Organizations Most Likely to Take Part
Several organizations, both within Iran and in exile, could play a role in forming an interim government and shaping the transition:
  1. National Front of Iran: A nationalist, secular group with historical roots in Mohammad Mossadegh’s movement. It could provide ideological legitimacy for a democratic transition, though its influence inside Iran is limited.
  2. Council for Coordinating the Reforms Front: The main reformist coalition, including groups like the 2nd of Khordad Movement. Despite being sidelined by the Guardian Council, it could re-emerge to represent moderate voices.
  3. Democratic Party of Iranian Kurdistan (PDKI): A key ethnic opposition group with an armed wing, active in Kurdish regions. It has called for regime change and could secure regional stability.
  4. People’s Mujahedin Organization of Iran (MEK): A controversial exile group with a history of armed opposition. Despite its organizational capacity, its collaboration with Saddam Hussein during the Iran-Iraq War makes it widely unpopular domestically.
  5. Women, Life, Freedom Movement: Not a formal organization but a powerful grassroots movement sparked by Mahsa Amini’s death in 2022. It could influence the transition through civil society pressure and figures like Narges Mohammadi.
  6. Haft Aban Front (Solidarity for the Freedom of Iran): An exile-based coalition advocating for democratic change, potentially serving as a platform for diaspora involvement.
Figures Most Likely to Launch Political Parties
In a post-regime Iran, new political parties would likely emerge from existing opposition leaders, activists, and reformists seeking to formalize their influence. The following figures are well-positioned to launch or lead political parties:
  1. Reza Pahlavi: Likely to form a monarchist or secular-democratic party, leveraging his diaspora support and international connections. His platform would emphasize national unity and secular governance, though he may struggle to overcome republican opposition.
  2. Narges Mohammadi: Could lead a human rights-focused party rooted in the “Women, Life, Freedom” movement, appealing to women, youth, and urban progressives. Her imprisonment might delay her involvement, but her moral authority would be a strong foundation.
  3. Hamed Esmaeilion: A Canada-based activist and former ADFI member, he could launch a secular-republican party. His focus on unity and his criticism of Pahlavi’s Israel trip suggest he would prioritize inclusivity over monarchist agendas.
  4. Mostafa Tajzadeh: A former deputy minister under Khatami and a reformist currently imprisoned. If freed, he could lead a reformist party aiming to bridge moderate regime elements with opposition groups, though his regime ties might limit his appeal.
  5. Faezeh Hashemi: Daughter of former President Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani and a former MP known for criticizing the Supreme Leader. She could form a reformist or women-led party, drawing on her political lineage and outspokenness.
Critical Considerations
  • Fragmentation Risk: The Iranian opposition is notoriously divided, as seen in the ADFI’s collapse in 2023. Any coalition would need to overcome ideological divides (monarchist vs. republican, secular vs. reformist) and ethnic tensions to avoid civil conflict.
  • Foreign Influence: External actors like Israel, the U.S., or Saudi Arabia could shape the transition, but their involvement risks backlash, as many Iranians are wary of foreign-backed regime change.
  • IRGC’s Role: The IRGC’s reaction to a regime collapse would be pivotal. If it splinters, moderate factions might join a reformist coalition; if it remains unified, it could resist any transition.
  • Public Sentiment: Low voter turnout (e.g., 41% in 2024) and mass protests (e.g., 2022) reflect deep disillusionment with the regime. Any interim government must address economic woes, human rights, and calls for systemic change to gain legitimacy.
Conclusion
The top contenders for an interim prime minister—Reza Pahlavi, Masoud Pezeshkian, and Narges Mohammadi—represent diverse factions: monarchist, reformist, and activist. A coalition might combine secular democrats, ethnic groups, and reformists, but unity remains a challenge due to historical divisions. Organizations like the National Front, PDKI, and the Women, Life, Freedom movement would likely play key roles, while figures like Pahlavi, Mohammadi, and Esmaeilion could launch influential parties. The transition’s success would hinge on managing internal divisions, countering IRGC resistance, and addressing public demands for democracy and economic reform.





This vision for a post-regime Iran emphasizes a rapid, surgical transition to democracy, avoiding the chaos of Iraq’s state collapse while ensuring inclusivity and an orderly path to a new constitution. Below, we outline a framework for this transition, addressing the key components of the proposal: a quick strike to topple the regime, the interim government structure, the dismantling of the IRGC, reintegration of its members, and the encouragement of political pluralism. We will incorporate the specific roles we have assigned (Masoud Pezeshkian as Interim Prime Minister, Reza Pahlavi as Interim President, Narges Mohammadi as Deputy Prime Minister, and cabinet members like Hamed Esmaeilion, Mostafa Tajzadeh, and Faezeh Hashemi) and analyze the feasibility, challenges, and steps needed to achieve this outcome. The response will remain concise yet comprehensive, grounded in Iran’s political realities and lessons from other transitions.
Framework for an Orderly Transition in Iran
1. Rapid Regime Change
Objective: Topple the current regime with minimal disruption to state institutions, ensuring Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei’s exile and a swift transfer of power.
  • Mechanism: A “quick strike” could involve a combination of internal uprising and external pressure. The 2022 “Women, Life, Freedom” protests showed public discontent, but they lacked coordination. A targeted operation might include:
    • Internal Defection: Encourage defections among mid-level IRGC commanders and technocrats, leveraging economic discontent (e.g., 40% inflation in 2024) and promises of amnesty for those who abandon Khamenei.
    • External Support: Limited airstrikes or cyberattacks by a coalition (e.g., U.S., Israel) targeting regime strongholds (e.g., IRGC bases) could weaken Khamenei’s grip without a full invasion. Covert support for opposition groups like the PDKI or Haft Aban Front could amplify internal pressure.
    • Exile Offer: Offer Khamenei safe passage to a neutral country (e.g., Qatar or Turkey) to avoid a prolonged fight. Historical precedent (e.g., Shah’s exile in 1979) suggests this could expedite collapse but risks backlash if perceived as leniency.
  • Challenges:
    • Iran’s terrain and IRGC’s loyalty make a quick strike complex. Unlike Iraq in 2003, Iran’s military is decentralized, with 150,000 IRGC members and 350,000 Basij militia.
    • Foreign intervention risks uniting Iranians against external actors, as seen in anti-U.S. sentiment post-Soleimani assassination (2020).
    • Ensuring Khamenei’s exile requires international guarantees, which may be undermined by hardliners demanding his prosecution.
  • Mitigation:
    • Frame the strike as a liberation led by Iranians, with foreign support secondary. Publicize defections to demoralize loyalists.
    • Secure UN or regional (e.g., Saudi Arabia) backing for Khamenei’s exile to legitimize the deal.
    • Use diaspora media (e.g., Iran International) to broadcast calls for unity and a non-violent transition.
2. Interim Government Structure
Objective: Establish an inclusive interim government to stabilize Iran and prepare for elections to a constituent assembly within two years.
  • Proposed Leadership:
    • Interim Prime Minister: Masoud Pezeshkian
      • Rationale: As a reformist president elected in 2024, Pezeshkian has domestic legitimacy and a track record of advocating dialogue and economic reform. His role would reassure moderates and technocrats while signaling continuity.
      • Role: Oversee day-to-day governance, economic stabilization, and coordination with international actors.
    • Interim President: Reza Pahlavi
      • Rationale: Pahlavi’s international recognition and secular-democratic rhetoric make him a symbolic figurehead. His presidency could rally diaspora support and counterbalance Pezeshkian’s regime ties.
      • Role: Act as a unifying figure, engage with global leaders, and promote national reconciliation.
    • Deputy Prime Minister: Narges Mohammadi
      • Rationale: Her Nobel Peace Prize and leadership in the “Women, Life, Freedom” movement give her moral authority. She represents civil society and ensures women’s voices are central.
      • Role: Lead human rights reforms, oversee transitional justice, and mobilize grassroots support.
    • Cabinet Members: Hamed Esmaeilion (e.g., Foreign Affairs), Mostafa Tajzadeh (e.g., Interior), Faezeh Hashemi (e.g., Education or Women’s Affairs), plus representatives from ethnic groups (e.g., PDKI for Kurdish affairs).
      • Rationale: Esmaeilion’s diaspora activism and Tajzadeh’s reformist credentials bridge external and internal opposition. Hashemi’s political lineage and gender advocacy add inclusivity. Ethnic representation prevents regional unrest.
  • Feasibility:
    • Strengths: The mix of reformists (Pezeshkian, Tajzadeh), activists (Mohammadi, Esmaeilion), and a monarchist (Pahlavi) reflects a broad coalition, addressing urban, rural, and diaspora demands. It aligns with your goal of inclusivity.
    • Weaknesses: Pahlavi’s monarchist ties may alienate republicans, while Pezeshkian’s regime association could undermine trust among hardline opposition. Mohammadi’s imprisonment requires her immediate release, which may face IRGC resistance.
  • Implementation:
    • Form a transitional council within 30 days of regime collapse, with representatives from reformists, activists, ethnic groups, and diaspora.
    • Announce the interim government via a public broadcast, emphasizing unity and a two-year timeline for elections.
    • Secure international recognition (e.g., UN, EU) to bolster legitimacy and access reconstruction funds.
3. Dismantling the IRGC
Objective: Dissolve the IRGC as a political and military entity while preserving state security to avoid Iraq-style chaos.
  • Strategy:
    • Immediate Dissolution: Declare the IRGC disbanded, seizing its assets (e.g., economic holdings like Khatam al-Anbia). Redirect funds to public services (e.g., healthcare, education).
    • Security Transition: Retain the regular army (Artesh, ~400,000 personnel) to maintain order. Integrate vetted Basij members into police forces under civilian oversight.
    • Amnesty and Reintegration: After a one-year cooling-off period, allow IRGC members without severe human rights violations to apply for army or police roles. Establish a vetting process led by an independent commission, including civil society figures like Mohammadi.
    • Transitional Justice: Prosecute senior IRGC leaders for crimes (e.g., 1988 massacres, protest crackdowns) via a hybrid tribunal with international judges to ensure impartiality.
  • Challenges:
    • The IRGC’s economic dominance (estimated 20-40% of GDP) and armed strength make dissolution risky. Loyalists could form insurgencies, as seen with Ba’athists in Iraq.
    • Vetting 150,000 IRGC members is logistically complex and may fuel resentment if perceived as unfair.
    • Balancing justice and amnesty is delicate; hardline opposition may demand harsher purges.
  • Mitigation:
    • Offer economic incentives (e.g., pensions, retraining) to low-ranking IRGC members to discourage resistance.
    • Deploy international peacekeepers (e.g., UN or neutral states like Oman) to support the army during the transition.
    • Publicize the vetting process to build trust, using media to highlight reintegration success stories.
4. Encouraging Political Pluralism
Objective: Foster a vibrant political landscape by encouraging leading figures to launch parties, ensuring a democratic transition.
  • Key Figures and Potential Parties:
    • Reza Pahlavi: Likely to form a secular-democratic or monarchist party, appealing to nationalists and diaspora. Platform: national unity, free markets, secular governance.
    • Narges Mohammadi: Could lead a progressive party rooted in human rights, focusing on women, youth, and social justice. Platform: gender equality, civil liberties, transitional justice.
    • Hamed Esmaeilion: Might launch a republican party emphasizing inclusivity and diaspora engagement. Platform: democratic federalism, economic reform.
    • Mostafa Tajzadeh: Could form a reformist party bridging moderates and opposition. Platform: gradual democratization, economic modernization.
    • Faezeh Hashemi: Likely to lead a women-focused or reformist party. Platform: gender equity, education reform, social inclusion.
    • Ethnic Leaders: PDKI or Baluchi figures could form regional parties advocating federalism or autonomy.
  • Implementation:
    • Legalize political parties within 90 days, with a low registration threshold to encourage participation.
    • Provide state funding for new parties to level the playing field, modeled on post-apartheid South Africa.
    • Host a national conference within six months, inviting all factions to draft a transitional charter outlining electoral rules.
  • Challenges:
    • Historical opposition divisions (e.g., 2023 ADFI collapse) could resurface, with monarchists, republicans, and ethnic groups clashing.
    • Economic hardship (e.g., 30% unemployment in 2024) may fuel populist or extremist parties.
    • Ensuring ethnic representation without stoking separatism requires careful constitutional design.
  • Mitigation:
    • Establish an electoral commission with diverse representation to oversee party formation and elections.
    • Use public campaigns to promote pluralism, highlighting the interim government’s inclusivity.
    • Engage regional powers (e.g., Turkey, Saudi Arabia) to discourage support for divisive factions.
5. Path to a Constituent Assembly
Objective: Hold elections for a constituent assembly within two years to draft a new democratic constitution.
  • Timeline:
    • Month 1-3: Stabilize security, dissolve IRGC, form interim government.
    • Month 4-12: Implement economic reforms (e.g., subsidy restructuring), release political prisoners, legalize parties.
    • Year 1-1.5: Conduct voter registration, establish electoral laws, and hold local elections to build democratic experience.
    • Year 2: Elect a constituent assembly (e.g., 300-500 delegates) to draft the constitution within six months, followed by a referendum.
  • Constitutional Principles:
    • Secular governance with separation of powers.
    • Protection of human rights, including gender equality and minority rights.
    • Federal or decentralized structure to address ethnic demands without risking separatism.
    • Civilian control of the military, with no role for ideological forces like the IRGC.
  • Challenges:
    • Low trust in elections (e.g., 41% turnout in 2024) requires robust voter education and transparency.
    • Ethnic tensions may complicate federalism debates, as urban Persians often oppose decentralization.
    • External interference (e.g., Israel pushing anti-Arab narratives) could polarize the process.
  • Mitigation:
    • Invite international observers (e.g., Carter Center) to monitor elections and ensure fairness.
    • Hold public forums to debate constitutional principles, amplifying voices like Mohammadi’s.
    • Secure IMF or World Bank support for economic stabilization to reduce public discontent during the transition.
6. Avoiding a Forever War
Objective: Prevent prolonged conflict by maintaining state institutions, integrating former regime elements, and securing international support.
  • Lessons from Iraq and Afghanistan:
    • Iraq (2003): Dismantling the Ba’ath Party and army fueled insurgency. Iran must retain the Artesh and bureaucracy while purging IRGC influence.
    • Afghanistan (2021): Lack of inclusive governance led to Taliban resurgence. Iran’s interim government must include all major factions to avoid exclusion-driven conflict.
    • Iran’s Advantage: Higher literacy (87%), urban population (76%), and historical democratic experiments (e.g., 1906 Constitution) make Iran more suited for democracy than Iraq or Afghanistan.
  • Strategies:
    • Preserve ministries (e.g., health, education) and employ existing civil servants to ensure functionality.
    • Offer amnesty to low-ranking IRGC and Basij members to prevent insurgency, while prosecuting senior leaders to satisfy justice demands.
    • Engage neighbors (e.g., Saudi Arabia, Turkey) in a stability pact to prevent proxy conflicts, leveraging 2023 Iran-Saudi normalization talks.
  • Risks:
    • IRGC remnants could wage asymmetric warfare, especially in border regions.
    • Economic collapse could spark unrest, undermining the interim government.
    • Foreign overreach (e.g., U.S. bases) risks nationalist backlash.
  • Mitigation:
    • Deploy rapid-response units from the army to secure key cities (Tehran, Isfahan, Tabriz).
    • Secure emergency aid (e.g., $5 billion from China or EU) to stabilize the economy.
    • Limit foreign military presence to advisors or peacekeepers under UN mandate.
Feasibility and Critical Analysis
Your proposal is ambitious but plausible, given Iran’s educated populace and historical democratic aspirations. However, its success depends on:
  1. Speed and Coordination: A quick strike requires precise execution and defector buy-in. Missteps could prolong fighting, as seen in Syria (2011–).
  2. Inclusivity: The proposed interim government is diverse but risks factionalism. Pahlavi and Pezeshkian must publicly reconcile their visions to maintain unity.
  3. IRGC Management: Dismantling the IRGC while reintegrating its members is a delicate balance. A transparent vetting process is critical to avoid insurgency.
  4. International Support: Western backing could delegitimize the government if perceived as neocolonial. Regional actors (e.g., Qatar) should mediate.
  5. Public Trust: Economic hardship and regime propaganda have eroded trust. Immediate reforms (e.g., freeing prisoners, lifting internet bans) are essential to win public support.
Conclusion
This plan for Iran’s transition to democracy via a quick strike, an inclusive interim government, and a two-year path to a new constitution is achievable if executed with precision. Masoud Pezeshkian as Interim Prime Minister, Reza Pahlavi as Interim President, and Narges Mohammadi as Deputy Prime Minister, alongside cabinet members like Hamed Esmaeilion, Mostafa Tajzadeh, and Faezeh Hashemi, could stabilize the transition by uniting reformists, activists, and diaspora. Dismantling the IRGC while reintegrating its members after vetting prevents chaos, and encouraging political parties ensures long-term pluralism. By preserving state institutions, securing international support, and addressing public demands, Iran can avoid a forever war and build on its democratic potential. Key risks—IRGC resistance, factionalism, and foreign interference—require careful management through transparency, inclusive governance, and regional diplomacy.



at No comments:
Labels: ,

Will Trump Enter Iran?

 


Iran is far larger and more complicated than both Afghanistan and Iraq. Looks like Trump is looking to enter the war. Are we looking at a bigger mess than what Afghanistan and Iraq were? Will this overshadow everything else in American politics?

Iran is indeed a tougher nut to crack than Afghanistan or Iraq. It’s got a population of about 90 million, a diverse ethnic makeup, and a military with real teeth—think advanced missiles, drones, and a network of regional proxies like Hezbollah. Its terrain is rugged, and its nuclear facilities are often buried deep, like the Fordow site under a mountain. Compared to Iraq’s 2003 invasion or Afghanistan’s sparse Taliban resistance, any conflict with Iran would likely be messier, costlier, and harder to contain. A war could spiral into regional chaos, disrupt oil markets through the Strait of Hormuz, and provoke retaliation against U.S. bases or allies. The human and economic toll could dwarf the $2 trillion and thousands of lives lost in Afghanistan and Iraq.

That said, Trump’s stance isn’t a done deal. He’s been waffling—talking tough about “unconditional surrender” while also floating diplomacy and denying immediate plans to strike. His base is split: isolationists like Tucker Carlson and Marjorie Taylor Greene scream “no more forever wars,” while hawks like Lindsey Graham push for action. This internal MAGA feud could restrain him, as could the memory of past quagmires. Congress is also stirring, with figures like Tim Kaine and Thomas Massie demanding authorization for any military move, which could slow things down.
Will it overshadow American politics? If Trump goes all-in, probably. A war with Iran would suck up attention, resources, and political capital, sidelining domestic fights over immigration, tariffs, or culture wars. The media would be wall-to-wall with it, and public opinion—already wary after Iraq and Afghanistan—could turn fast if casualties mount or gas prices spike. But if Trump sticks to posturing or limited strikes, it might just simmer as one of many crises, competing with his domestic agenda. Polls show 57% of Americans back action against Iran’s nuclear program, but that support could crater if it’s not quick and clean, which history suggests it won’t be.
The counterpoint? Some argue a precise strike could cripple Iran’s nuclear ambitions without a full invasion, avoiding a repeat of past debacles. Trump’s team might bet on shock-and-awe tech, like 30,000-pound bunker-busters, to do the job. But Iran’s not Iraq in 2003—its regime is resilient, and bombing often rallies populations against the attacker, not the government. Plus, the “what next?” question looms large: regime change or a failed state could unleash worse chaos than Saddam’s fall or Libya’s collapse.
The risk of a bigger mess is high, but Trump’s political instincts and base pressure might keep him from diving in headfirst. It’ll dominate politics only if he escalates beyond threats. Keep an eye on whether Congress grows a spine or if Iran’s response forces his hand.



at No comments:
Labels: ,

18: Iran

Trump greenlights Iran attack after tense situation room meeting as Middle East on brink "I'm not looking to fight. But if it's a choice between fighting and them [Iran] having a nuclear weapon, you have to do what you have to do," he said........ "I have ideas as to what to do," he said. "I like to make a final decision one second before."

Deported (novel)
Empty Country (novel)
Trump’s Default: The Mist Of Empire (novel)
The 20% Growth Revolution: Nepal’s Path to Prosperity Through Kalkiism
Rethinking Trade: A Blueprint for a Just and Thriving Global Economy
The $500 Billion Pivot: How the India-US Alliance Can Reshape Global Trade
Trump’s Trade War
Peace For Taiwan Is Possible
Formula For Peace In Ukraine
The Last Age of War, The First Age of Peace: Lord Kalki, Prophecies, and the Path to Global Redemption
AOC 2028: : The Future of American Progressivism

Stephen Miller is becoming a victim of his mass deportation policy's success In a meeting last month, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller tore into senior leaders at Immigrations and Customs Enforcement, demanding a massive surge in arrests of undocumented immigrants. As ICE tried to comply with Miller’s orders, immigration activists and other concerned Americans launched a series of protests in defiance of the mass deportation agenda. But it was a different set of protests that got the attention of Miller’s boss, President Donald Trump. .......... Last Thursday, the administration abruptly paused raids and arrests at hotels, farms and restaurants, a stunning shift in priorities that was clearly contrary to Miller’s orders. But the change was short-lived. The Department of Homeland Security reversed that guidance Monday, according to The Washington Post, allowing the immigration raids on those industries to resume and letting Miller retake control of the policy that has been the focus of his years in both Trump administrations. .......... Since Inauguration Day, Miller has had carte blanche on immigration policy in his dual role as deputy chief of staff and homeland security adviser. His insistence that ICE make 3,000 arrests per day kick-started a scramble from field offices to meet his demand. But as Vox’s Eric Levitz recently noted, Miller’s own strategy of deterrence at the border has led to a decline in the kind of encounters that would make it easy for ICE agents to rack up those numbers: ........... Over the past two months, America witnessed the largest decline in its foreign-born workforce since the pandemic in 2020. This contraction was driven partly by a collapse in unauthorized border crossings. Between January 2022 and June 2024, US Customs and Border Protection encountered an average of 200,000 people per month at America’s Southwest border. According to an analysis of government data from Deutsche Bank, that figure has fallen to just 12,000 people per month since Trump’s inauguration. ........... That has meant ICE has had to expand its list of targets to meet its quotas, including rounding up day laborers in Home Depot parking lots and field workers toiling on farms. The resulting climate of fear has scared more than just undocumented immigrants in these workforces. A Texas farmer recently told NBC affiliate KVEO of Brownsville, Texas, that within the last three weeks, there have been “zero people wanting to come out and be exposed to be able to be picked up whether they are legal or illegal.” ....... Facing irate farmers, who have been a key base of support, and with his own ties to the hotel industry, Trump (at least briefly) chose to sacrifice some deportation numbers to appease them. .......... For now, as the decision to reverse course and resume the raids shows, Miller has the upper hand among his would-be rivals in the administration. Trump’s order to have ICE increase operations in Democratic-run cities likewise underscores that the broader attack on immigrants hasn’t lost cachet with the president. The costs are piling up, though, as DHS pulls in more resources to fuel the deportation drive, with ICE reportedly already around $1 billion over its budget for the year. ....... None of that is likely to deter Miller, though, in his drive to deport roughly 1 million people each year. But as the damage of Miller’s monomaniacal obsession deepens, Americans are less and less happy with the results. In other words, the more successful Miller’s anti-immigrant purge is at disrupting the status quo, the likelier Trump will wind up second-guessing him. This likely then won’t be the last time we see Trump overrule his most loyal attendant if he feels the downsides are outweighing the benefits.

Deported (novel)
Empty Country (novel)
Trump’s Default: The Mist Of Empire (novel)
The 20% Growth Revolution: Nepal’s Path to Prosperity Through Kalkiism
Rethinking Trade: A Blueprint for a Just and Thriving Global Economy
The $500 Billion Pivot: How the India-US Alliance Can Reshape Global Trade
Trump’s Trade War
Peace For Taiwan Is Possible
Formula For Peace In Ukraine
The Last Age of War, The First Age of Peace: Lord Kalki, Prophecies, and the Path to Global Redemption
AOC 2028: : The Future of American Progressivism

Unless the Trump family secretly built a U.S. factory, industry experts say the $500 Made in America smartphone is a fantasy
Russia warns US over Iran Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov has warned the U.S. that direct military assistance to Israel could radically destabilize the Middle East........... Any involvement by the U.S., a key ally of Israel, could widen the conflict. Russia's stance over the threat to Iran, with which it has a close strategic relationship, signals heightened global concern over the potential for a wider war that could engulf neighboring countries and disrupt global energy supplies. ......... Moscow's concerns about the conflict spinning out of control and affecting Russia's interests in the Middle East, where it has strategic partnerships and military presence. ........ Putin, who signed a strategic partnership treaty with Iran earlier this year, has urged both sides to halt hostilities. His intervention highlights Russia's dual role as a close partner to Iran and a major player in regional diplomacy, striving to prevent escalation while maintaining influence. ......... President Donald Trump has publicly weighed several options, including joining Israel in strikes against Iran's nuclear sites. On Tuesday, Trump suggested Iran should "surrender," calling for an "unconditional surrender" from Tehran. He also mused on social media about killing Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei but clarified, "We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now." .......... Earlier, Khamenei condemned Trump's threats as "vulgar," stating, Iran "cannot surrendered," and warned that "any military entry will undoubtedly be met with irreversible repercussions."

Deported (novel)
Empty Country (novel)
Trump’s Default: The Mist Of Empire (novel)
The 20% Growth Revolution: Nepal’s Path to Prosperity Through Kalkiism
Rethinking Trade: A Blueprint for a Just and Thriving Global Economy
The $500 Billion Pivot: How the India-US Alliance Can Reshape Global Trade
Trump’s Trade War
Peace For Taiwan Is Possible
Formula For Peace In Ukraine
The Last Age of War, The First Age of Peace: Lord Kalki, Prophecies, and the Path to Global Redemption
AOC 2028: : The Future of American Progressivism

at No comments:
Labels: ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)