Amsterdam News (June 15, 2006) It’s Time to Reclaim Our Voter Power By Leecia Eve
This week we once again celebrate Juneteenth, commemorating the period in 1865 when Union soldiers came to Galveston, Texas to announce that the Civil War was over, President Abraham Lincoln had signed the Emancipation Proclamation (two and a half years earlier), and enslaved people of African descent were now free. (It was the Thirteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, however, passed by Congress in January 1865, and ratified by the states in December of that year, that outlawed slavery everywhere in the United States, not just in areas under rebel control, as the Emancipation Proclamation addressed.)
Juneteenth is a time for paying respect to the indescribable suffering of millions of Americans of African descent and celebrating their hard-fought freedom. It is also a period of reflection and renewal.
Some of the earliest Juneteenth events in the late 1800s were political rallies used to teach African Americans about their voting rights. This is a challenge that exists today, particularly with respect to those convicted of crimes who have fully repaid their debt to society and who, at least under New York law, are in fact eligible to vote.
While I was a candidate for Lieutenant Governor, I often talked about the need for engaging people in the political process who had either never been engaged before or who had at one time been engaged but who had become so disaffected that they had become disconnected from the process. Though I am no longer a candidate, I remain steadfast in my commitment to this issue.
Millions of men and women, right here in New York State, have chosen time and time again not to vote. This, at a time when what happens in government will have consequences for generations to come. American lives are being risked every day to promote democracy around the world, but our democracy is weak right here at home.
In November 2002, there were 11.2 million New Yorkers registered to vote and an estimated additional 2 million who were eligible but who were not registered. That's more than 13 million New Yorkers who could have voted in 2002, making history by electing New York's first African-American Governor, and yet, only 4.6 million New Yorkers - about one out of every three - took the time to vote. I believe New York can, and must, do better.
Yes, 2002 was not a presidential election year, but even during presidential elections, year after year, New York State continually ranks near the bottom among the fifty states in terms of the percentage of people that vote. Indeed, in 2004, New York was ranked 46th out of the 50 states and the District of Columbia in terms of voter participation.
The numbers are particularly dismal when it comes to young people, African Americans and Hispanics. In 2004, in New York State, only one out of every seven 18-to 24-year olds, one out of every three people of African descent, and one out of every five Hispanics who were eligible actually voted.
This is very troubling because our communities and state will only be as great as the extent to which many more of us play a role in determining our collective future. So much is at stake, including the quality of the education our children receive, the need for quality and affordable housing and healthcare and for many more good-paying jobs with good benefits, the safety and security of our communities, and fulfilling the promise of a just New York and America for everyone.
Is voting the answer to everything? Of course not; life’s not that simple. But when you don’t vote, you let someone else make a choice for you. You give away your proxy.
There are approximately 4 million African Americans and Hispanics and millions of young adults in New York State that are of voting age, and who, if energized, could play a primary role in helping to move both New York and the nation forward.
We founded an organization called SHOW UP New York to try and do everything we can to encourage many more New Yorkers to "just show up" and exercise one of their most basic constitutional rights, the right to vote, and to continue to make their voices heard about the issues of concern to them and their families beyond any given election, when the governing begins.
In this period of celebration, reflection, and renewal, I hope you will join me in convincing many of our brothers and sisters to take a few minutes, just two or three times a year, to let their voices be heard in one of the most powerful ways possible, by simply voting. We will all be the better for it.
Leecia Eve is a former candidate for New York State Lieutenant Governor and Counsel to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton. She was the principal drafter of the “Count Every Vote Act,” comprehensive federal legislation designed to ensure that every vote cast is counted. She is also the Founder and Chair of SHOW UP New York, which is focused on increasing the level of civic participation among young people and people of color across New York State.
Network North Star Holds 7th Annual Women’s Leadership ... WebWire (press release), GA -Jun 15, 2006 Network North Star, an employee resource group for African American employees at Kodak, will hold its 7th Annual Women’s Leadership Conference on June 20-21 at Crowne Plaza hotel on State Street. The conference theme is “Succeeding Amidst Corporate Change - Be Comfortable, Be Capable, Be Viable, Be Visible.” ....... The Keynote Speaker is Leecia Eve , Founder and Chair "Show Up New York.” Leecia Roberta Eve, former Counsel to Senator Hilary Rodham Clinton, is the Founder and Chairperson of Just Show Up, an organization dedicated to engaging New Yorkers in the voting process. She is a former Vice President of the Minority Bar Association of Western New York and is a member of The LINKS Incorporated and of the Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority.
1.
18 July
21:12
AT&T Broadband, United States
2.
18 July
22:12
America Online, United States
3.
19 July
01:30
ALLTEL Corporation, United States
4.
19 July
02:22
Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey
5.
19 July
02:30
Pacific Internet, Australia
6.
19 July
08:40
Inktomi Corp, United States
7.
19 July
12:17
South Africa Internet Exchange, South Africa
8.
19 July
12:42
Optimum Online, United States
9.
19 July
13:46
Los Angeles Times, Los Angeles, United States
10.
19 July
13:57
Interliant, United States
11.
19 July
14:21
Bulldog Communications, United Kingdom
12.
19 July
14:47
Optimum Online, United States
13.
19 July
14:57
RCN Corporation, United States
14.
19 July
15:55
Optimum Online, United States
15.
19 July
16:08
XO Communications, United States
16.
19 July
16:28
Qwest Communications Int., United States
17.
19 July
17:09
Verizon Online, Reston, United States
18.
19 July
17:10
Verizon Online, Reston, United States
19.
19 July
18:26
Blueyonder, United Kingdom
20.
19 July
18:48
Inktomi Corp, United States
21.
19 July
19:44
Be Un limited, United Kingdom
22.
19 July
22:23
Inktomi Corp, United States
23.
19 July
23:49
Pacific Bell Internet, United States
24.
20 July
00:28
Comcast Communications, United States
25.
20 July
00:40
Comcast Communications, United States
26.
20 July
03:37
Singapore Telecommunications Limited, Singapore
27.
20 July
04:41
Frontier Communications, Statesboro, United States
28.
20 July
06:22
Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd, India
29.
20 July
09:03
Road Runner, New York, United States
30.
20 July
09:19
New York Life, New York, United States
31.
20 July
09:20
New York Life, New York, United States
32.
20 July
10:31
Verizon Online, United States
33.
20 July
12:03
EarthLink, Inc., United States
34.
20 July
12:06
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd., India
35.
20 July
12:21
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
36.
20 July
12:44
Adelphia Communications, United States
37.
20 July
12:48
Optimum Online, United States
38.
20 July
13:28
Optimum Online, United States
39.
20 July
13:31
Optimum Online, United States
40.
20 July
13:33
Comcast Communications, United States
41.
20 July
13:33
Blueyonder, United Kingdom
42.
20 July
13:40
Optimum Online, United States
43.
20 July
13:41
California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, United States
Iraq was a wrong war, and Lieberman seems to be paying the price. He has found himself at the wrong place at the wrong time. Gore's running mate from 2000 who did not quit his Senatorial campaign, the most senior person on the Hill to happen to be Jewish, a centrist who was too far to the right for many hard core Democrats, Lieberman has seen a few ups and downs.
I could not tell you too many of his biographical details, but what is happening to him is clearly a convulsion within the Democratic Party on the Iraq war.
No Democratic Senator voted for the Iraq War that unfolded. Bush was authorized to exhaust all other options before going to war. Instead he went to war to exhaust all other options. If that was a fault, that was Bush' fault.
Since then Bush has engaged in emotional blackmail. You might not have agreed with me when I went in, but now that I am in, it is your patriotic duty to support me in whatever decision I take, and it is my decision to stay there as long as it might take.
It is unrealistic to expect troops at war to one fine day just pack up and leave, although it would be prudent to devise a strategy to leave as early as possible.
But Lieberman has more than Iraq eating at him. A new kind of politics is about to beat the old kind. It is called the grassroots and the netroots. Bloggers are coming out in force. The tide be turning. It is telling that a Lieberman-Lamont debate was nationally televised. This story is big.
This is also a story of rich Republicans like Lamont in the Northeast abandoning the Republican Party like poor whites abandoned the Democratic Party in the South. There is something going on.
Hillary is safe for 2008. She has not been parroting Bush. She has been one of the most anti-Bush Senators. Just when you thought hubby Bill took one more fishing trip with Bush Sr. Hillary has often come out lashing at this Bush administration.
On the war, she is no lefty looney, granted, but she appreciates the enormity of the task at hand. This Long War is the same scale as the Cold War. There are ways to minimize the violence, and you do that by being very proactive politically. But disengaging is not the answer, and she knows it.
Not just war, but also peace depends on being strong on defense. Hillary is strong on defense. Bush is married to ideology, Hillary to Bill Clinton. You can't possibly hang Bush around Hillary's neck.
Ned Lamont for Senate Ned Lamont - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaLamont unsuccessfully ran for a state Senate seat in 1990, finishing in third place........ Lamont is the great-grandson of former J.P. Morgan & Co. Chairman Thomas W. Lamont, and has an inherited net worth estimated between $90 million and $300 million. ..... last voted for a Republican in 1988. He has told The Hartford Courant that "Eastern Moderates no longer have a place in the GOP." ...... Lamont initially supported Lieberman's 2006 re-election bid, even donating $500 to Lieberman in February 2005....... Lamont has spent over $1.5 million of his fortune on the campaign and has pledged to spend another million of his funds in the primary. Also, Lamont pledged not to take money from lobbyists. ........ Lieberman, who has been criticized for being too conservative due to his support of the 2003 Iraq War and perceived closeness to the George W. Bush administration. His campaign began with support from "grassroots" and "netroots and " Democratic progressive activists, including DailyKos and MoveOn.org ...... insisted that he was a "bread and butter Democrat" and on a number of occasions asked, "Who is Ned Lamont?" ...... Lieberman stated, in response to Lamont's assertion that he supported Republican policies, that he had voted with the Democratic caucus in the Senate 90% of the time. Ned Lamont for Senate MyDD :: Ned Lamont, the Political EntrepreneurI don't normally ask for this, but please forward this post far and wide to everyone you know, especially people in Connecticut....... that's what neophytes in the political process bring to the table, enthusiasm and energy without discipline....... I know how bad Lieberman is. It's not just the war vote, it's how he introduced the Iraq war resolution and undercut all the other Democratic Senators who wanted to authorize force with more restrictions. It's not just the consistent Bush-kissing, it's how he grandstands against Alito and the Bankruptcy Bill and then votes for cloture ........ He's with us when it doesn't matter, and he's against us when it does........ I was scared that we'd throw a sacrificial lamb at a DLC giant....... After my time in Connecticut, I am 100% behind Ned Lamont....... His favorite politicians are Bill Clinton and Bill Bradley, and the reason is because he believes we need a more entrepreneurial style of politics...... a new crop of entrepreneurial leaders who seek to occupy and create new political space, not to swell on the legacy of the New Dealers ........ Building a telecommunications company takes guts, bravado, perseverance, and savvy. It means calculated risk-taking, not blind recklessness or excessive caution. Yet even as he was building his business, he worked on policy with the Brookings Institute, fiscal policy and health care........ his business background and reputation in the state makes it very difficult to pigeonhole him as some unrealistic liberal. ....... there were 125,000 in the uncontested Presidential primary in 2004 and with a volunteer list above 1000, that means that almost 2% of the total necessary primary vote is volunteering for Lamont. ....... Moveon.org has 50,000 members in Connecticut. That's low-hanging fruit for Lamont........ Massive swings are taking place towards outsider progressive candidates, 31 points for Deval Patrick in MA and 24 points for Matt Brown in RI. These are specifically Northeastern states, with very similar dynamics in terms of ossified political machinery........ I want to be able to say that I was there when Ned Lamont first decided to beat Joe Lieberman and put America back on the road to a bright progressive future....... the netroots is as usual more in touch with the local party activists than the DC conventional wisdumb....... Daily Kos: CT-Sen: Lieberman freaking out about Lamont Old world politics versus new. Insurance and corporate interests versus people-power. A Fox News Democrat versus a real one...... I plugged in to the gossip mill while in DC over the weekend, and this race has got everyone talking. LamontBlog: Ned Lamont for CT TIME.com: Lieberman Punches, but Lamont Remains Standing -- Page 1millionaire cable executive Ned Lamont ...... the debate, which was broadcast nationally on C-SPAN and MSNBC...... after Leiberman said Lamont had taken "his fifth position" on Iraq withdrawal and Lamont responded by largely restating his view that the U.S should withdraw troops soon, Lieberman sighed and noted Lamont had taken his sixth position........ has infuriated Democrats with his vocal defense of President Bush's Iraq policy. ...... criticized Lieberman for supporting an energy bill that had tax breaks for big business and attacked him for his support of school vouchers...... Lamont's highest elective office was serving as a city councilman more than a decade ago ....... 'Political Junkie', Diary, I just met the progressive Dem who will dethrone Joe Lieberman, January 6, 2006 After spending an hour talking with Ned Lamont yesterday, I can assure you, he is the real thing. He has a tremendous intellect, but doesn't condescend or talk like a patrician....... and then proceed to Washington to take back the power in this country from the huge corporations, special interests, big-money lobbyists and their obedient minions in Congress....... Stay tuned. And remember - you heard it here first.