Pages

Sunday, September 05, 2010

Looking For Professor Obama


These are turbulent times. But right now it is looking to me like this will not be like 1994, but rather like 1982, if that. The president will keep the Senate, and will keep the House, but he will end up with a thinner margin in the House.

This Is Not 1994
Or Maybe Bill Clinton Is Running On Empty
The Hammer Effect, The Butterfly Effect
Obama Needs To Ride The Reshma Insurgency Wave To November Victory
A President Is Like A Political Billionaire
Credit For Credit Card Bill Goes To Barack Obama
How My Grandfather Became Mayor The First Time
The First Time I Heard The Obama Name
Obama, Reshma
Keeping The House And The Senate

Course deviation will not work.

These are not Clinton or Reagan times. These are FDR times. Parallels with 1994 and 1982 are out of place. America has been going through the birth pangs. Either it will emerge a stronger country than ever, a post-industrial society, a knowledge economy, in tune with the environment, or it will emerge as yesterday's power. We already live in a multi-polar world, but America is capable of having its best days lie ahead. That is where leadership comes in. Shanghai might have the tall buildings, and the shiny streets and the fast trains, but it does not have New York City's diversity. America is going to save itself when it finally does comprehensive immigration reform next year.

America's 13 trillion dollar debt is like the bulging waistlines of Americans. If America can lose weight, American can reign in the debt. The leader has to know and stand by what the right thing to do is. Polls and sometimes even election results don't give you the best message.

I want the president to be able to keep the House and the Senate.

When the American people stop thinking they vote Republican. The trick is to keep them thinking. The president needs to get very active in these final weeks. He has to explain. He has to become the professor again that he once was in Chicago.

The Republicans have not offered any new ideas. Their plank is that they are the party of no. Their message is, this guy Obama wants to take away your French fries. And some Americans are like, I am not sure I like the guy who will take away my French fries. Obama's tough job is to explain why French fries are making you fat. Fat is unhealthy.

Obama was not handed a normal, cyclical recession like Clinton and Reagan were. Obama was handed a generational recession, and that gives him the opportunity to be a transformational president. These bad times are an opportunity for greatness. And these November elections are important. He has to communicate directly with the American people.

Time

How Twitter Helped Resurrect Kanye West:the VMAs incident solidified a long-held suspicion: Kanye West was unlikable. Even President Obama called him a "jackass." .... "redeeming yourself through arrogance is like smoking with cancer" ..... the secret to Kanye's appeal is his ability to balance his egotism with humor, and in his fallow period he rediscovered that equilibrium through Twitter. ..... He drinks wine out of gold goblets and eats cereal out of a turquoise chalice...... He has now written more than 300 tweets, ranging from the insightful ("Don't you hate it when you say bye to someone then yall get on the elevator together and it's like, now what?? Awkwaaard") ...... he mused on Twitter, "Fur pillows are hard to actually sleep on."

How Barack Obama Became Mr. Unpopular:When Obama arrived in office in January '09, his Gallup approval rating stood at 68%, a high for a newly elected leader not seen since John Kennedy in 1961. Today Obama's job approval has been hovering in the mid-40s ..... the President's party teeters on the brink of a broad setback in November, including the possible loss of both houses of Congress...... By a 10-point margin, people say they will vote for Republicans over Democrats in Congress, the largest such gap ever recorded by Gallup ..... Midterms are almost always bad for first-term Presidents, and worse in hard times...... In 2008, Newport notes, trust in the federal government was at a historic low, dropping to around 25%, where it still remains. Yet Obama has offered government as the primary solution to most of the nation's woes ..... roughly 1 in 3 of the President's 2008 supporters had serious questions about government spending solutions for the economy....... "We have a lot of government activism at a time when skepticism of government efficiency is at an all-time high." ....... For someone who so carefully read the political mood as a candidate, Obama has been unexpectedly passive at moments as President...... His appeals to the grass-roots army that he started, through online videos for Organizing for America, took on a formal, emotionless tone. He acted less like an action-oriented President than a Prime Minister overseeing some vast but balky legislative machinery. When challenged about his declining popularity, the President tended to deflect the blame — to the state of the economy, the ferocity of the news cycle and right-wing misinformation campaigns........ By the end of the summer, the disconnect had grown so severe that only 1 in 3 Americans in a Pew poll accurately identified him as a Christian, down from 51% in October 2008. At the same time, the base voters Obama had energized so well in '08 went back into hibernation. ....... many of the same groups Obama turned out for the first time in record numbers had suffered the most from the recession ..... at this point in their presidencies, both Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton scored slightly lower approval ratings than Obama...... at this point in their presidencies, both Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton scored slightly lower approval ratings than Obama. ...... Reagan was facing rising discontent at the midterm, driven by huge unemployment numbers that peaked at 10.8% at year's end. ..... won re-election by an enormous margin. ...... it is clear that Obama's brief window of one-party rule has closed...... "I think the next couple of years, we've got to focus on debt and deficits," Obama told NBC News after his summer vacation

Is Wisconsin's Paul Ryan Too Bold for the GOP?: At a time when most of his Republican colleagues are content to posture as the Party of No, Ryan is virtually alone in his determination to detail exactly what the U.S. must do to cut federal spending and make a dent in the nation's $13 trillion debt. In a very short time, he has become a hero to deficit hawks. Ryan, says former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, is "one of three, maybe four, young Republicans who are going to change the face of the party." ...... In 2006 he wrote legislation that would give the President line-item veto power--a move lawmakers on both sides have long resisted. In 2007 he called for earmark transparency ...... Paul Krugman took a whack at Ryan's plan and declared it as hollow as a piñata. "Mr. Ryan isn't offering fresh food for thought," he wrote in the New York Times. "He's serving up leftovers from the 1990s drenched in flimflam sauce.".... Ryan is the most intellectually serious Republican at the moment ...... "The appetite is much stronger outside the Beltway than inside," he says. "The political class up here is in the old thinking, which is, This is such a political weapon, don't touch it, don't touch it, don't touch it, you'll die. Because they listen to the pollsters." ....... runs a grueling daily exercise class in Washington for members of Congress--think 200 push-ups.


Enhanced by Zemanta

New York Daily News Is Da Bomb

New York Times Also Endorsed David Yassky: Yassky Who?
New York Daily News: Saujani for Congress: It's Time To Pump New Blood Into The Tired New York Delegation: It has been 18 years since a challenger has defeated an incumbent member of Congress from New York City. So it takes more than a little moxie for an upstart not only to take on a veteran, but to run strong..... she has highlighted how badly the city's Washington delegation needs fresh ideas and energy....... with the theme that longevity alone is not good enough. She's right, and the Daily News endorses Saujani in the Sept. 14 Democratic primary....... Saujani, 34, began her career at a major New York law firm and did stints as an attorney at three investment houses before resigning to run for Congress. Up to speed on a broad range of issues, she takes impressively clear stands. Her vigor is refreshing....... she outdoes Maloney on cutting-edge topics like education reform. ....... Her work as a lawyer in the financial sector - the lifeblood of the New York economy - is also a plus. She supports reasonable regulation while ruling out destructive demonization of Wall Street. ..... She urges new tax credits to spur business innovation - and pledges to be a champion on immigration reform, which, based on her life history, she is likely to do with passion...... Maloney ..she has essentially been a lockstep member of a congressional majority that joined with President Obama in pushing through legislation that has proven fiscally irresponsible...... Ill-designed, the $800 million stimulus program bought far too little economic bang for the buck, while health care reform fell a long way from controlling costs....... it must be said that nine years have passed since 9/11, and the sick still await help....... So much for the value of Maloney's seniority....... it is distinctly disappointing that Maloney refuses to debate Saujani on television......She knocked all previous challengers off the ballot before they could even start campaigns...... the truth must be told: Maloney has complacently maxed out. The time for new vision and higher energy has arrived. Vote Saujani.
Yes, we are running strong. Yes, we got fresh ideas and energy. Yes, she is up to speed. Yes, she takes clear, bold stands. Yes, she is a breath of fresh air. Why only education reform? She outdoes Maloney on health care reform, on Wall Street reform. She is already dreaming of Health Care Reform 2.0 and Wall Street Reform 2.0. And this below is the clincher for me. Finally a paper that "gets" it.
Her work as a lawyer in the financial sector - the lifeblood of the New York economy - is also a plus. She supports reasonable regulation while ruling out destructive demonization of Wall Street.
We are Reshma 2010, and we are here to win. We are not here to make a statement.
it is distinctly disappointing that Maloney refuses to debate Saujani on television.
This is my idea of a ringing endorsement.
the truth must be told: Maloney has complacently maxed out. The time for new vision and higher energy has arrived. Vote Saujani.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Saturday, September 04, 2010

New York Times Also Endorsed David Yassky: Yassky Who?

Image representing New York Times as depicted ...Image via CrunchBase

Mainstream Media Kept Saying John Liu Was Losing
John Liu: Mayor Of NYC: 2013
Politico: The N.Y. Times Endorsement Edition: Against Rangel, For Lazio And Maloney
It is a testimony to the white racialism within the power structure of the New York Times that the newspaper should go ahead and endorse the Reshma Saujani opponent. It is not racism, but it sure is racialism. (Charlie Rangel: Monkeyface, Carolyn Maloney: Radioface)

The New York Times has a lot of catching up to do. The Times does not seem to have a clue as to where this country and this world is headed. The Times is not even making an attempt as to grasp the strong insurgency mood sweeping this country as we speak. Tectonic shifts are underway, and the Times is asleep at the wheel. Tomorrow is another day, but today I am not feeling particularly proud of my hometown newspaper.

This is a mistake on the part of the New York Times just like endorsing David Yassky was a huge mistake.

Or perhaps we need to pay attention to the hidden message. The Times has endorsed Rick Lazio and Carolyn Maloney. Both will lose. Andrew Cuomo will win, as will Reshma Saujani. Yassky also lost. Go Times!

In The News

New York Post: Maloney's Big Money:ust-filed preprimary figures show Maloney, 64, with $207,268 raised between July 1 and Aug. 25 and Saujani, 34, with $165,664 raised during the same period .... And yet it was Saujani who outspent Maloney during the filing period, $366,000 to $300,000. ..... scandal-scarred .. Rangel, who faces a congressional disciplinary trial on ethics charges later this month, used a quarter of his $445,000 in campaign spending on legal fees.

New York Observer: Reshma Robos, Mails Against Maloney:Says Reshma spokesman James Allen, "It's disingenuous for Carolyn Maloney to accuse Reshma of negative and dishonest campaigning by sending negative and dishonest mailers to voters. Maloney's campaign has not disputed the fact that the Congresswoman held a fundraiser at the home of a financial services lobbyist while negotiating financial reform. Voters should know about these ethics transgressions — and we'll continue to make them aware of Maloney's questionable conduct."

The Lo Down NY: The Times Endorses Maloney: Reshma Saujani, an impressive and energetic young lawyer of Indian descent who argues that New York needs the voice of a new generation and a new slice of the city’s ethnic pie.

Capital Tonight: Times Dings Rangel, Boosts Maloney:The paper noted Johnson has been “a strong advocate for women’s rights and civil rights for many years” and said she’s the best choice of the field of Democrats trying to unseat Rangel, even though her campaign hasn’t received nearly as much attention as Assemblyman Adam Clayton Powell IV’s bid to win back the seat Rangel took from his father in 1970..... (Interestingly, the same day the Times is endorsing someone against Rangel, it’s also running a story about a poll it commissioned on the congressman’s future that found an “overwhelming majority” of Manhattan voters think he should either resign of end his re-election bid to clear his name).

Enhanced by Zemanta