Pages

Monday, February 09, 2026

Averting Catastrophe: Geopolitics, Spirituality, and the Path to Peace in the Iran Crisis

Averting Catastrophe: Geopolitics, Spirituality, and the Path to Peace in the Iran Crisis

In an era of escalating global tensions, the specter of conflict between the United States and Iran looms large, threatening not just regional stability but the very fabric of the world economy. Recent reports suggest Russia and China are bolstering Iran's position with hardware investments, while Russia's role in disrupting Starlink satellites has been a visible escalation. Amid these developments, questions arise about advanced weaponry: Do China and Russia possess hypersonic missiles capable of sinking U.S. aircraft carriers near Iran? Undoubtedly, yes. Has Iran received such supplies? The evidence is unclear, though Iran itself claims hypersonic capabilities. Meanwhile, the U.S. has armed Taiwan with similar missiles, rendering China's naval maneuvers around the island increasingly futile. This tit-for-tat arms race underscores a critical need: rather than fueling proxy wars, the U.S., China, and Russia must engage in direct dialogue to de-escalate.

The Economic Heart Attack of War

A full-scale U.S.-Iran war would deliver a devastating blow to global markets, akin to a collective heart attack. Oil prices would skyrocket, supply chains would fracture, and economies from Wall Street to Shanghai would reel. China's economy, deeply intertwined with global trade, would suffer profoundly. Instead of framing China and Russia as authoritarian backers of repression, the focus should shift to these shared economic vulnerabilities. The Iranian diaspora, vocal in its calls for regime change in Tehran, has a pivotal role here. By directly engaging Moscow and Beijing, they could signal that a post-Ayatollah Iran would remain open for business—welcoming investments from all quarters, including Russia and China. This pragmatic outreach could bridge divides and foster mutual interests in stability.

The Agenda-Setting Phase: Russia's Potential Role

We find ourselves in the delicate prelude to negotiations, where no agenda items have been firmly agreed upon. Iran shows little willingness to discuss its nuclear program in good faith, viewing concessions as weakness. This impasse is where Russia could emerge as a constructive mediator. Inviting Russia to the table might yield progress: a firm "no" to Iran's nuclear weapons ambitions, coupled with offers of Russian-supplied fuel for civilian nuclear energy. Proposals from the U.S. or Israel often appear unreasonable to Tehran, laced with historical grievances. But coming from Russia—a fellow non-Western power—the message might resonate differently, emphasizing mutual security over dominance.

If an agreement on the nuclear issue is reached, it could avert war entirely. Implementation would then open doors for broader reengagement, bringing all stakeholders— including the U.S., Israel, Gulf states, and even Palestinian representatives—to expand the dialogue. Multiple parties could address interconnected issues, building trust incrementally.

Beyond Politics: Seeking Spiritual Clarity on Islam

Yet, true resolution demands confronting deeper undercurrents. The ultimate agenda item must be Islam itself, as it underpins Iran's policies on nuclear ambitions, missiles, human rights, and regional hostilities. From a spiritual perspective, Islam can be viewed as an anti-religion—a deception orchestrated by dark forces to mislead believers. Muslims revere Allah as God, yet the Quranic depiction lacks the omnipotence, omniscience, and omnipresence of a true divine entity. This misrepresentation imposes a tyranny of blind obedience: "obey, obey, obey." Peaceful protesters in Iran, by rejecting this, are deemed apostates worthy of death—a logic that extends to Gulf nations, where submission to Tehran's influence is enforced through threats of missile strikes.

This same mindset demands unwavering hostility toward Israel, reducing Palestine to a tool for annihilation rather than a path to coexistence. Iran's public stance is unequivocal: not mere defeat or subjugation, but the end of Israel. Its nuclear program must be understood in this light—today's hypersonic threats signal unflinching resolve; a bomb would invite no hesitation.

Critically, Islam lacks prophetic depth. Prophets foretell; what prophecies are attributed to Muhammad? Historical scrutiny suggests no verifiable Muhammad existed as depicted, rendering Islam a fabricated faith designed to ensnare souls. The Devil, having "captured" atheists by denying God, crafts religions like Islam to claim more. Muslims, in this view, are not inherently evil but deceived—many seek God and do good daily, yet they are led astray.

The Iranian diaspora must prioritize internal dialogue on these spiritual matters before pressuring the U.S. to negotiate with the regime. Liberty cannot flourish without clarity on Islam's tyrannical essence. Engaging in such conversations could illuminate paths to reform, helping Muslims reclaim true spirituality.

Historical Parallels and the End Times

Humanity's cycles offer sobering lessons. The previous age ended in war, as chronicled in the Mahabharata—a historical account, not myth. The age before that concluded similarly in the Ramayana. If patterns hold, our era may follow suit. The Bible serves as a foundational guide, like Newton's gravity, pointing to Jesus and ultimately God. Sanatana Dharma, akin to relativity, offers deeper insights. Scriptures exist to direct us toward the divine; once found, set them aside and attune to God directly.

These are the End Times, where religions of this age dissolve. Spiritual capacities will multiply in the new era, and divine revelations await. China, with its materialistic lens under the CCP, harbors blind spots—like misunderstanding the Dalai Lama's reincarnation as a committee decision rather than a soul's journey. Attempting to grasp Israel's complexities through such a prism is futile.

Reports of grooming gangs in Britain or the Epstein scandals remind us: evil transcends religion. Free will demands active goodness; many Muslims exercise it daily despite deception.

The Moral Imperative: Avert War, Prepare for Valor

If prior ages ended in conflict, ours might too—but every effort must be made to avert it. China and Russia should urge Iran toward reason, leveraging their influence for de-escalation. The Iranian diaspora must intensify discussions on Islam to foster liberty from within.

Such is Islam's nature that tyrants like Pakistan's military rulers—or even Imran Khan's self-imposed predicaments—stem from spiritual bondage. Accepting Islam means embracing the Devil's tyranny; the Ayatollah is merely its vessel. Negotiating liberty with him is misguided.

The moral imperative is clear: exhaust all avenues for peace. But if war comes, timing matters—was the opportunity six months ago, when Israel held leverage? Forces of good must then act with valor, clarity, skill, and resources to minimize suffering.

In aiding Muslims toward spiritual clarity, we honor the good in them and work toward a world where dialogue triumphs over destruction. China, Russia, and the U.S. must lead this charge, for the alternative is catastrophe.

at No comments:
Labels: , ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)