Showing posts with label andrew yang. Show all posts
Showing posts with label andrew yang. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 23, 2020

Andrew Yang Has Thrown His Hat Into The Ring

Andrew Yang is running for Mayor of New York City. And my first thought is, that is a great way to keep alive the national and global conversation around Universal Basic Income. 

I do think he is a serious candidate. He has a greater name recognition than anyone else running. But that takes you only so far. He brings sexy to the race. But running NYC is nuts and bolts. I think the Brooklyn borough president is also a serious candidate. 

I am left asking, what is his agenda? What is his agenda for the city

His big selling point could be that he will turn this into the number one tech city. And, obviously, he would have to deliver UBI at the city level. 




 

  1. Cash in the fact that you have more name recognition than anyone else and find ways to keep it that way.
  2. National brand name equals national fundraising.
  3. Rejoice that you have no footprints in city politics. Dems eat Dems in NYC.
  4. Let your top campaign promise be that you want to make NYC the top tech city in the world.
  5. Also, that you will offer a version of the UBI in the city even if only to the bottom 20%. That will be the springboard to your future presidential campaign. Never say never.

Thursday, October 01, 2020

The Social Dilemma


The Social Dilemma’ Review: Unplug and Run This documentary from Jeff Orlowski explores how addiction and privacy breaches are features, not bugs, of social media platforms. ......... That social media can be addictive and creepy isn’t a revelation to anyone who uses Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and the like. But in Jeff Orlowski’s documentary “The Social Dilemma,” conscientious defectors from these companies explain that the perniciousness of social networking platforms is a feature, not a bug. .......... the manipulation of human behavior for profit is coded into these companies with Machiavellian precision: Infinite scrolling and push notifications keep users constantly engaged; personalized recommendations use data not just to predict but also to influence our actions, turning users into easy prey for advertisers and propagandists. ........ men and (a few) women who helped build social media and now fear the effects of their creations on users’ mental health and the foundations of democracy. They deliver their cautionary testimonies with the force of a start-up pitch, employing crisp aphorisms and pithy analogies. ......... Russia didn’t hack Facebook; it simply used the platform. ........ fictional scenes of a suburban family suffering the consequences of social-media addiction. There are silent dinners, a pubescent daughter (Sophia Hammons) with self-image issues and a teenage son (Skyler Gisondo) who’s radicalized by YouTube recommendations promoting a vague ideology. ............ the movie’s interlocutors pin an increase in mental illness on social media usage yet don’t acknowledge factors like a rise in economic insecurity. .......... many suggest that with the right changes, we can salvage the good of social media without the bad ......... two distinct targets of critique: the technology that causes destructive behaviors and the culture of unchecked capitalism that produces it. ......... the incursion of data mining and manipulative technology ....... The movie is streaming on Netflix, where it’ll become another node in the service’s data-based algorithm.



I think there is a solution. And the solution is to treat all data gathered around an individual to be the property of that individual. Companies may monetize that data, but the individual keeps the big chunk of the earning. The establishment of proper property rights might also be the antidote to the culture mindless data collecting. The data can fund the UBI, or Universal Basic Income, I think. 

One step could be the formation of a T100, the top 100 tech companies in the world by market cap. That T100 would voluntarily establish the data rights. It might be a 70-30 split in favor of the individual. 

 ‘The Social Dilemma’ Will Freak You Out—But There’s More to the Story    Dramatic political polarization. Rising anxiety and depression. An uptick in teen suicide rates. Misinformation that spreads like wildfire. The common denominator of all these phenomena is that they’re fueled in part by our seemingly innocuous participation in digital social networking. But how can simple acts like sharing photos and articles, reading the news, and connecting with friends have such destructive consequences? ............... the way social media gets people “hooked” by exploiting the brain’s dopamine response and using machine learning algorithms to serve up the customized content most likely to keep each person scrolling/watching/clicking. ........  “Every single action you take is carefully monitored and recorded,” says Jeff Siebert, a former exec at Twitter. The intelligence gleaned from those actions is then used in conjunction with our own psychological weaknesses to get us to watch more videos, share more content, see more ads, and continue driving Big Tech’s money-making engine. .............  For the first few years of social media’s existence, we thought it was the best thing since sliced bread. Now it’s on a nosedive to the other end of the spectrum—we’re condemning it and focusing on its ills and unintended consequences. The next phase is to find some kind of balance, most likely through adjustments in design and, possibly, regulation. .......... The issue with social media is that it’s going to be a lot trickier to fix than, say, adding seatbelts and air bags to cars. The sheer size and reach of these tools, and the way in which they overlap with issues of freedom of speech and privacy—not to mention how they’ve changed the way humans interact—means it will likely take a lot of trial and error to come out with tools that feel good for us to use without being addicting, give us only true, unbiased information in a way that’s engaging without preying on our emotions, and allow us to share content and experiences while preventing misinformation and hate speech. ................ “While we’ve all been looking out for the moment when AI would overwhelm human strengths—when would we get the Singularity, when would AI take our jobs, when would it be smarter than humans—we missed this much much earlier point when technology didn’t overwhelm human strengths, but it undermined human weaknesses.”

Wednesday, December 11, 2019

Pete Buttigieg: First Impressions



After you have read four articles on Pete Buttigieg, it is fair to say you are no Pete Buttigieg expert, and I make no such claim. For a guy who was Barack Obama's first full-time volunteer in all of New York City - me - I am proudly a detached spectator this election season. And so, considering yesterday was the first time I looked into Pete ought to tell you. People are not paying attention just yet. Those who worry Pete is lagging in South Carolina don't remember Hillary was leading Obama by a wide margin in South Carolina at this stage of the game. South Carolina was talked of as Hillary's "firewall." That wall collapsed overnight, literally, when Obama won Iowa. To me it is a foregone conclusion that should Pete win both Iowa and New Hampshire, he will very likely be the nominee. I would give him a 95% chance.

So what are my first impressions? First of, this guy is not policy timid like the media makes him out to be. I found him anything but. He comes across as less policy timid than everyone who made a go at it over the past four decades. And it is partly him, mostly that Reagan, as he points out, has run out of steam.

The biggest lie about him is that Bernie and Warren are for Medicare For All, but Pete is not all that. He is very much for Medicare For All, but he thinks it needs to be phased in. And when phasing in if people who have private insurers wish to keep it that way, why not? If you listen to Pete, he is basically criticizing Bernie and Warren for not having thought this through. There is definitely anxiety among the 150 million-plus who have private insurance. They are not opposed to others having health care. But they hear Medicare For All and they hear, looks like Bernie wants me to take off my oxygen mask. That anxiety is real. And it is a symptom that Bernie has not done a good job of selling whatever it is that he is selling.



Pete is policy bold. I was surprised to learn. I should not have been. On politics, he is both agile and steel. More surprising than his policy boldness is that this guy is tough. Of all the Dems running, Donald Trump, if it is him and not Pence for some reason, would have the hardest time pushing Pete around. And he pushed everybody around in 2016.

Pete is the polar opposite of Trump on good manners and basic decency. Donald Trump gives you the impression his mother taught him table manners which he forgot at his mother's dinner table. I mean, the guy was discussing his penis size at a presidential debate during the 2016 cycle. Children are supposed to learn civics lessons from their president. Not from Donald though. Pete is amazingly decent. And after a few years of Donald, you thought that had gone to disuse.



Trump is fake tough. Trump is stupid tough. It is immigrants not automation. Pete is genuinely tough. He is comfortable enough in his toughness that he is not worried decency will cut him out to be a loser.

And Pete is young. That is no small detail. Half the field is way past retirement age. That makes Pete stand out. There is a freshness to his appeal.

I have yet to watch videos of Pete. I would like to watch a few hours of him. I have not yet watched even 10 minutes, I don't think so. YouTube makes you feel you can always look him up, so why rush!

If I had to take a guess, I'd say Pete might pick Andrew Yang for running mate, or someone who is not even running. If AOC were old enough, she would have been great, but she is not yet 35.

My first impressions of Pete Buttigieg are that he is a great human being, a great politician, and a remarkable policy guy. He would make for an excellent nominee.





Googling Pete
Could It Be A Pete Andrew Ticket?
Pete Is It?
Finland: Capitalist Paradise?
Why Resign!?
Step By Step To Solving The Big Problems
If Pete Buttiegieg Were To Win Iowa
Two Out Of Three: Kamala, Andrew, Pete
Kamala Pete 2020

Tuesday, November 12, 2019

News: Modi, Trump, Andrew Yang, Iran, Kamala Harris

Tuesday, October 15, 2019

Warren's Lead: Expected

ELIZABETH WARREN LEADS JOE BIDEN BY DOUBLE DIGITS IN LATEST 2020 POLL Warren tops the Democratic candidate field with 28 percent of the vote while Sanders comes in second with 21 percent. Biden, who has maintained his status as Democratic front-runner since entering the race in the spring, has fallen to just 18 percent....... Warren is holding steady as primary voters' second choice, meaning she is in good position to rise as other candidates drop out of the race...... Warren, 70, is the only top-three candidate who beats Trump on perceptions of how health impacts their ability to govern. Two-thirds of voters said they believe Warren's physical condition is good enough

Right now it is looking like:

President: Elizabeth Warren
Vice President: Bernie Sanders
Attorney General: Kamala Harris
Secretary Of Urban Affairs: Pete
Secretary Of Labor: Andrew Yang
UN Ambassador: Tulsi Gabbard
Texas Governor: Beto
Chancellor, Obama Library: Joe Biden



Monday, September 23, 2019

Capitalism's Own Propaganda Machine

Look at this.

News: Hong Kong, Vancouver, Diaspora Nationalism

Over a hundred million Chinese travel outside China every year. And, out of their own seeming free will, they travel back. China, obviously, is no North Korea. A lot of them will tell you, they support their government. They will line up arguments in its defense. What is going on? It is conditioning. And it is so total.

There is a similar conditioning in America. It is capitalist conditioning. The corporations that so own the political process, that so own the media, have also similarly conditioned 300 million Americans.

China needs a heavy dose of democracy. China needs to open up. That is the only way it will avoid the middle income trap. The only way China can hope to become a high tech superpower that it aspires to be is if there is free speech in China.

America also needs a fair dose of democracy. Right now it is not a democracy. America is corporate socialism. It is a corporate welfare state. It is a political system designed to work for the biggest corporation and its richest citizens. Not even the top 1% but 1% of that 1%.

The CCP has a political monopoly in China that needs to be broken. Similarly, the stranglehold of the 0.01% in America has to be broken. Then America will become a democracy.

There is need for triangulation. We want post-capitalism. We want post-communism. We want democracy. We want a market economy devoid of monopolies and oligarchies and one party ownerships.

Hong Kong should not try to imitate America. Hong Kong needs to show America the way.

Friday, September 20, 2019

Andrew Yang MSNBC Climate Forum Town Hall

Thursday, September 12, 2019

Dem Debate: Texas Edition

Wednesday, September 11, 2019

Universal Basic Income (aka Freedom Dividend) Is Not Free Money



Somebody built the road in front of your house. You did not. Is that a "free" road? Does that road make you lazy? Is that road bad karma?

The road is infrastructure. For most people that is easy to grasp because it is physical, it is there. You see it.

Education and health are also infrastructures. But they are less concrete. You can't build a knowledge economy unless you make massive investments in education and health.

UBI, Universal Basic Income, is similarly infrastructure. It is just like the road. Before the UBI, poverty starts at zero. When you are poor, you are desperate. With UBI, you are still poor. But now poverty starts at 12,000 dollars as per the Andrew Yang proposal in circulation right now. You are no longer desperate. For a couple, that is 24K a year. That is not luxury income, but at least you can hope to get by.

But that's a lot of money in aggregate. It comes to trillions of dollars.

That is the thing.

(1) The income and wealth gap between the richest and the poorest is too wide, in this country as well as globally. That wide gap is not healthy for democracy. It is not healthy for the market economy. In fact, left to its own devices, that gap will keep getting wider and wider until there is a collapse of civilization. This is existential. And so a wealth tax makes sense. Elizabeth Warren is taking the lead on this one. She proposes that you pay two cents for every dollar you have above 50 million.

(2) Andrew Yang talks about a VAT, Value Added Tax, hardly an original idea. Most countries already have it. Instead of taxing income or wealth, you tax every business transaction, not just between companies and consumers, but also between companies. B2B as well as B2C.

(3) All the money that the government is already giving out to people comes to something like almost two trillion. But now, instead of making people fill out forms and harass them and humiliate them, you just give it to them. Cuts out a lot of red tape. Slims down the bureaucracy. Republicans should love this.

(4) My personal favorite that I don't see anyone on the campaign trail talk about is that all data generated by one person is that person's own personal oil well. Data is the oil. Companies may collect it, but they may not own it. Individuals own their data. This data is lucrative enough that it can fund the UBI for all humanity. But I am not at all opposed to the first three.

Humanity is about to enter an Age Of Abundance, mostly technology-driven.

Just like the industrial revolution brought to an end numerous jobs in agriculture, the fourth industrial revolution is about to wipe out sector after sector of jobs. Handled well, we all can be better off. We could see interesting developments like shorter work weeks, longer vacations, people spending more time with family and friends.

I see numerous new jobs being created. People will have their UBI, that might start at 1K a month, but will gradually go up. On top of that, they will have jobs that pay them another 50K or 100K or 200K. These will be jobs that we have not even begun to imagine yet.

Just like a taxi driver does not have to build a car, and so can just focus on driving, think of robots and Artificial Intelligence as the new car. You can always do a value add on top of that.

People having more time for worship is not a bad idea. People having more time to spend with their parents, with their children is not a bad idea. There are tremendous unmet needs in education and health. New service sector jobs will get created. Art will flourish like never before. There will be a music and movies boom. People will travel more and there will be a greater cross-cultural understanding.

UBI is just basic infrastructure for the fourth industrial revolution.

Yang Warren 2020

Nobody is saying American Basic Income (ABI) though. UBI means universal. It can only work if it covers all humanity. It can be rolled out in stages.







Yang Warren 2020



Hong Kong Should Inspire America?

Yang In The Top Five
Andrew Yang: Suave Politician?
Andrew Yang: Chicken?
Climate Talk And The Dems
2020: Current Lineup
Andrew Yang And Media Bias

Bernie Picked The Wrong Fight With Andrew Yang
Electoral College Idiocy
Andrew Yang: A Contender
Andrew Yang's Eureka Moment And The Political Work That Remains Doing
Andrew-Pete Ticket
#YangMediaBlackout
Biden's Resilience: Health Care?
Blatant Racial Bias Against Andrew Yang In The Mainstream Media
Andrew Yang Clocking At 4% And Fifth Position
Could Andrew Yang Become President?
Bernie And Andrew
America's Insane Gun Laws, Hate Ideologies, Mass Shootings: Recipe For Domestic Terrorism
The US Health Care Mess
Bernie: Reagan Or McCain?
The Third Democratic Debate