Barackface: trump

Showing posts with label trump. Show all posts

Sunday, July 06, 2025

6: Trump

World War III Is Unnecessary
Grounded Greatness: The Case For Smart Surface Transit In Future Cities
The Garden Of Last Debates (novel)
Deported (novel)
Empty Country (novel)
Trump’s Default: The Mist Of Empire (novel)
The 20% Growth Revolution: Nepal’s Path to Prosperity Through Kalkiism
Rethinking Trade: A Blueprint for a Just and Thriving Global Economy
The $500 Billion Pivot: How the India-US Alliance Can Reshape Global Trade
Trump’s Trade War
Peace For Taiwan Is Possible
Formula For Peace In Ukraine
A 2T Cut
Are We Frozen in Time?: Tech Progress, Social Stagnation
The Last Age of War, The First Age of Peace: Lord Kalki, Prophecies, and the Path to Global Redemption
AOC 2028: : The Future of American Progressivism

Elon Musk hasn’t changed. Last year, he was fighting to stop out-of-control spending and save America from bankruptcy. Today, he’s still on the same mission. Same goal. Same fight. Others changed, he didn’t. pic.twitter.com/QhXWlh1EwU
— DogeDesigner (@cb_doge) July 6, 2025

The Tony Blair Institute participated in a project to develop a postwar Gaza plan that envisaged kick-starting the enclave’s economy with a “Trump Riviera” and an “Elon Musk Smart Manufacturing Zone”. https://t.co/XxEs1mMFXR pic.twitter.com/iSmSMiO0bm
— Adil Haque (@AdHaque110) July 6, 2025

Reflecting on a few of the better moments of my life. Second date with my husband. The day my child was born. Picking out a Christmas tree to cut down with my family. None had a thing to do with money.
— Nichole Wischoff (@NWischoff) July 6, 2025

This is why we bitcoin.

The value of the dollar continues to go down because the government can just print more.

There will ever only be 21 million bitcoin. pic.twitter.com/k0mh73bdhl
— Hailey Lennon (@HaileyLennonBTC) July 6, 2025

pic.twitter.com/DSO6k4Voqp
— evan loves worf (@esjesjesj) July 6, 2025

This guy—like most pushing Musk’s third party bullsh*t—isn’t an American.

He’s Lebanese and lives in Dubai.

We must get foreigners out of US politics. https://t.co/GfyEktUxn0
— Larry Alex Taunton (@LarryTaunton) July 6, 2025

🇺🇸 ELON: HERE ARE THE "AMERICA PARTY" KEY POLICIES

Elon says it will be centrist on most issues. Key policies:

* Reduce debt, allow only responsible spending
* Modernize the military with AI and robotics
* Push hard on AI to win the tech race
* Cut regulations across the board,… https://t.co/Nu4qhlq0Q6 pic.twitter.com/xp8ednCgGg
— Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) July 5, 2025

"Overpopulation" is a racist myth created by greedy white men.

Which is why Europe is never described as "overpopulated" and Africa is regularly described as "overpopulated," yet Europe has nearly 3x the population density of Africa.

"Overpopulation" is a lie. It doesn't exist. https://t.co/YaPxVtwbIC pic.twitter.com/fOL67MWJxQ
— David Hundeyin (@DavidHundeyin) July 6, 2025

BRICS Needs To Step Into the U.S. Immigration Crisis

The Expanding Power of ICE: Budget, Surveillance, and the Shadow of Authoritarianism
How China Can Escape the Middle-Income Trap and Reclaim Double-Digit Growth with Clean Energy
China's De‑dollarization: Steady But Gradual
Martial Law In The US: The Possibilities
The Tariff Trap: Why Trump’s Trade War Will Eventually Backfire
Gaza As A Country: A Vision for Peace, Prosperity, and a New Beginning
Aadhaar + UPI + Land Digitization + 100% Cashless: The Missing Links in India's Digital Renaissance
Why Tariffs Are a Bad Idea — Even When They Raise Money
The Traditional Indian Way of Preparing for a Meal: Cleanliness, Ritual, and Health
Rethinking Trade in an Age of Chaos: Why the Trump Tariff Circus Is No Substitute for a Global Blueprint
Human Rights Violations and Sexual Assault in ICE Detention Centers: A Comprehensive Analysis
Could President Trump Arrest Zohran Mamdani If Elected Mayor Of NYC?
Could Trump Deport Elon Musk? A Legal and Political Analysis

BRICS Needs to Step Into the U.S. Immigration Crisis

By Paramendra Bhagat

The United States is currently undergoing a seismic shift in its immigration policy—one that threatens the very foundations of human rights and international cooperation. The escalating mass detention and deportation agenda being pushed by segments of the American political leadership, under the guise of enforcement and security, is more than a domestic crisis. It is a global emergency—and one that demands a collective response.

It is time for BRICS to step up.

Immigration Is a Human Rights Issue—Not a National One

The idea that a human being can be "illegal" is a moral and logical fallacy. No nation creates people. Citizenship is a man-made construct, but human dignity is not. To render a person stateless—to erase them from the global civic ledger—is among the gravest human rights violations. This is not just about border enforcement; it’s about undermining the very basis of international law and decency.

What’s happening in the U.S. today should alarm every responsible global actor. BRICS—representing over 40% of the world's population—must act not only as an economic bloc but as a moral force. This is an opportunity to assert leadership.

From Club to Catalyst: What BRICS Must Become

For far too long, BRICS has functioned as a geopolitical "country club" for heads of state—issuing symbolic communiqués, holding summits, and making grand pronouncements. But symbolic diplomacy is no longer sufficient. The immigration crisis in the U.S. calls for something radically different: concrete, collective action.

BRICS must become a platform for policy innovation and humanitarian coordination.

It must create a Global Migration Task Force to document abuses, propose rights-based alternatives, and offer diplomatic resistance to any country—including the United States—when basic human dignity is being trampled upon.

America Was Built By Immigrants. It Still Runs On Them.

Let’s not forget: the United States is a nation of immigrants. The Irish, Italians, Germans, Poles, and others who came in droves in the 19th and early 20th centuries were not aristocrats—they were the laboring classes, the discarded and desperate. And yet, they built the world's most powerful economy.

Today’s undocumented workers in the U.S. fulfill the same role. They harvest crops, build homes, serve food, and care for children and elders. Without them, the service economy of every major U.S. city would collapse. The farms that feed America would go under. The logistics networks that move goods would seize up.

To call them criminals is a grotesque betrayal of history—and economics.

The Real Solution: Documentation, Not Deportation

The Gulf nations have long relied on immigrant labor—but they document their workers. The solution is not rounding people up with militarized force. The solution is identification, inclusion, and cooperation.

Instead of fueling a billion-dollar deportation machine, the U.S. could follow the model of functional documentation, worker permits, and labor rights. But it's unlikely to do that on its own. Which is why BRICS—and the Global South—must bring it to the negotiating table.

Failed U.S. Policies, Global Consequences

Let’s also talk about cause and effect.

Many of the migrants coming from Central and South America are fleeing violence and economic ruin fueled by decades of failed U.S. interventions—military and economic alike. The U.S. decries cartel violence, yet American guns are the lifeblood of these cartels. Meanwhile, the "War on Drugs" devastated local economies and left generations in ruin.

Immigration is not a U.S. issue. It is a foreign policy issue. One that BRICS must take seriously.

Trade Needs a New Paradigm

At the heart of this crisis is the collapse of multilateralism. The World Trade Organization (WTO) lies in ruins—gutted by U.S. unilateralism, especially during the Trump years. If free and fair trade is to have a future, it must be reimagined. BRICS is the ideal platform to launch a new conversation.

A good place to start:
👉 Rethinking Trade: A Blueprint for a Just and Thriving Global Economy

Trade, labor, migration, and climate are interlinked. The same extractive structures that created wealth for the Global North now perpetuate crises—from rising seas to displaced families.

A Decade to Achieve Parity: The Technology Advantage

It doesn’t have to take 50 years to achieve economic parity for the Global South. With technology, it can be done in 10. But only if we act fast and act together.

Here’s how:

Digital Identity: India’s Aadhar and UPI models must be adapted and exported across the Global South to promote digital inclusion and financial access.
e-Governance: Estonia’s eGov blueprint can be localized for transparency, public service delivery, and anti-corruption.
Land Digitization: Using satellite data and blockchain, every land parcel should be mapped, registered, and redistributed fairly. This alone could unlock $50 trillion in dormant capital—fuel for infrastructure, education, healthcare, and entrepreneurship.

This is not speculation. This is real policy engineering.
And the work is already being pioneered by the Kalkiism Research Center in Kathmandu.

Explore the future here:
👉 The 20% Growth Revolution: Nepal’s Path to Prosperity Through Kalkiism

A Call to BRICS: Step Into the Fire

This is more than economics. This is a test of moral clarity. The immigration gestapo ideology taking root in parts of the United States is not just American domestic policy. It is a foreign policy emergency for the rest of the world. And especially for the nations of the Global South, whose people are being targeted, deported, and dehumanized.

BRICS was born in hope. Let it now rise in courage.

Let it stand not just for GDPs and gold reserves, but for justice.

Let it become the lighthouse in an age of growing darkness.

The world is watching.

Will BRICS rise to meet the moment?

Paramendra Bhagat is the author of several books on global economics, technology, and governance. Follow his work at Kalkiism Research Center.

अमेरिका के आव्रजन संकट में BRICS को हस्तक्षेप करना चाहिए
लेखक: परमेंद्र भगत

अमेरिका में जो कुछ भी इस समय आव्रजन (इमिग्रेशन) को लेकर हो रहा है, वह अभूतपूर्व है और एक बुनियादी बदलाव का संकेत देता है। यह केवल अमेरिका की घरेलू नीति नहीं है—यह एक वैश्विक मानवीय संकट है। किसी भी इंसान को “अवैध” नहीं कहा जा सकता। किसी इंसान को राज्यहीन बना देना, यानी उसके अस्तित्व को कानूनी रूप से मिटा देना, एक गंभीर मानवाधिकार उल्लंघन है।

ऐसे समय में BRICS को आगे आना चाहिए और नेतृत्व दिखाना चाहिए।

केवल बयान नहीं, ठोस कार्रवाई ज़रूरी है

अब समय आ गया है कि BRICS सिर्फ एक औपचारिक क्लब बनकर न रहे जहाँ राष्ट्राध्यक्ष मिलते हैं और संयुक्त वक्तव्य जारी करते हैं। यह संगठन अब एक नीतिगत नवाचार और मानवीय सहयोग का केंद्र बनना चाहिए।

BRICS को अब एक Global Migration Task Force बनानी चाहिए, जो प्रवासियों के अधिकारों की रक्षा करे, अमेरिकी नीतियों की समीक्षा करे, और अंतरराष्ट्रीय समाधान सुझाए।

अमेरिका प्रवासियों से बना है, और अब भी चलता है

अमेरिका की पूरी नींव प्रवासियों ने रखी थी। 19वीं और 20वीं सदी में जो यूरोप से आए थे, वे कुलीन वर्ग के लोग नहीं थे—वे वहां के गरीब, मजदूर और उत्पीड़ित थे। आज भी अमेरिका की अर्थव्यवस्था का बड़ा हिस्सा undocumented श्रमिकों पर निर्भर है। खेतों से लेकर रेस्तरां तक, निर्माण से लेकर बुजुर्गों की देखभाल तक—वे हर जगह हैं। अगर इन्हें जबरन निकाल दिया जाए, तो अमेरिका के शहर और ग्रामीण अर्थव्यवस्थाएं चरमरा जाएंगी।

समाधान क्या है? कागज़ दो, बंदूक नहीं

जैसे खाड़ी देशों (Gulf countries) में विदेशी श्रमिकों को कानूनी दस्तावेज दिए जाते हैं, वैसे ही अमेरिका को भी श्रमिकों को डॉक्यूमेंट करना चाहिए। समाधान mass deportation नहीं है, बल्कि पहचान और समावेशन है। BRICS को अमेरिका को यह समझाना होगा कि आर्थिक विकास, श्रमिक अधिकार और मानवीय गरिमा एक साथ चल सकते हैं।

दक्षिण अमेरिका के प्रवासी अमेरिका की नीतियों के शिकार हैं

जो लोग दक्षिण अमेरिका से अमेरिका की ओर आ रहे हैं, वे अक्सर अमेरिकी हस्तक्षेप और नीतिगत असफलताओं के शिकार होते हैं। अमेरिका को ड्रग्स का डर है, लेकिन उन माफियाओं के पास जो हथियार हैं, वे अमेरिकी गन मार्केट से आए होते हैं। अमेरिका की गलत नीतियों के दुष्परिणाम अब सीमा पार दिख रहे हैं।

व्यापार को भी नई दिशा चाहिए

WTO अब प्रभावहीन हो गया है। ट्रंप प्रशासन ने इसे निष्क्रिय कर दिया। अब एक नया व्यापार ढांचा चाहिए, जो समानता और पारस्परिक सम्मान पर आधारित हो। BRICS को इस नए ढांचे की शुरुआत करनी चाहिए।

इसके लिए यह पुस्तक एक शुरुआती बिंदु हो सकती है:
👉 Rethinking Trade: A Blueprint for a Just and Thriving Global Economy

तकनीक से बदलेगा दक्षिण का भाग्य

Global South में आर्थिक समानता आने में 50 साल नहीं, केवल 10 साल लग सकते हैं—अगर तकनीक का सही उपयोग किया जाए। यहाँ कुछ समाधान हैं:

डिजिटल पहचान: भारत की आधार और UPI प्रणाली को पूरे Global South में अपनाया जाए।
ई-गवर्नेंस: एस्टोनिया का ई-गव मॉडल पारदर्शिता और कुशासन की समाप्ति में सहायक हो सकता है।
भूमि डिजिटलीकरण: सैटेलाइट और ब्लॉकचेन तकनीक से हर ज़मीन के टुकड़े को चिन्हित कर उसके मालिकाना हक तय किए जाएं। इससे $50 ट्रिलियन मूल्य की पूंजी का सृजन हो सकता है।

यह कोई कल्पना नहीं है। काठमांडू स्थित Kalkiism Research Center इस दिशा में पहले से अग्रणी काम कर रहा है।

जानें कैसे:
👉 The 20% Growth Revolution: Nepal’s Path to Prosperity Through Kalkiism

यह केवल अमेरिका की नीति नहीं, Global South की चुनौती है

जो 'इमिग्रेशन गेस्टापो' मानसिकता अमेरिका में उभर रही है, वह केवल उसकी घरेलू नीति नहीं है—यह Global South के लिए एक विदेश नीति संकट है। जिन देशों के लोग आज अमेरिका में शोषण का शिकार हैं, BRICS उन देशों की आवाज़ बन सकता है।

अब BRICS को केवल GDP या सोने की मात्रा से नहीं, बल्कि न्याय से परिभाषित होना चाहिए।

अब वक्त है कि BRICS सिर्फ़ एक समूह न रहे—बल्कि एक नैतिक शक्ति बन जाए।

क्या BRICS इस चुनौती का सामना करेगा?
या वह भी केवल एक और मंच बनकर रह जाएगा?

दुनिया देख रही है।

परमेंद्र भगत एक लेखक, शोधकर्ता और नीति विशेषज्ञ हैं, जो वैश्विक अर्थव्यवस्था, टेक्नोलॉजी और गवर्नेंस पर लेखन करते हैं। उनके काम को Kalkiism Research Center पर पढ़ा जा सकता है।

Empty Country (novel) https://t.co/yMDHpkCSP2
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) July 6, 2025

Trump’s Default: The Mist Of Empire (novel) https://t.co/33eFTUvWdn
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) July 6, 2025

BRICS Needs To Step Into the U.S. Immigration Crisis https://t.co/lSiz2A9gY4
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) July 6, 2025

अमेरिका के आव्रजन संकट में BRICS को हस्तक्षेप करना चाहिए https://t.co/lSiz2A9gY4
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) July 6, 2025

7/
WTO अब प्रभावहीन है।
BRICS को नया व्यापार मॉडल शुरू करना चाहिए, जो न्याय, समावेश और समानता पर आधारित हो।
📘 पढ़ें: Rethinking Trade: A Blueprint for a Just and Thriving Global Economy
👉 https://t.co/8aGH1Vh2WL
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) July 6, 2025

10/
काठमांडू स्थित Kalkiism Research Center इस दिशा में अग्रणी काम कर रहा है।
अगर उनके सुझाव अपनाए जाएं, तो कोई भी Global South देश 20% विकास दर हासिल कर सकता है।
📘 The 20% Growth Revolution
👉 https://t.co/sv9xIB8J74
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) July 6, 2025

13/
दुनिया देख रही है।
Global South अब नेतृत्व करने को तैयार है।
समय आ गया है—उठिए, जुड़िए, और कुछ करिए।
✊🌍
— परमेंद्र भगत
📘 Kalkiism Research Center
👉 https://t.co/sv9xIB8J74
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) July 6, 2025

Rethinking Trade: A Blueprint for a Just and Thriving Global Economy https://t.co/8aGH1Vh2WL @narendramodi @bricscouncil_in @BRICS_MEDIA @RealBRICSnews
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) July 6, 2025

Empty Country (novel) https://t.co/yMDHpkCSP2 @BRICSChannel @sabya_za @TetherBrics @BRICSPLUSA
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) July 6, 2025

Trump’s Default: The Mist Of Empire (novel) https://t.co/33eFTUvWdn @BRICSAstronomy @BRICSNewsFR @bricsif @BRICSparma @BRICSCCIWomen @BRICSCountries @BRICSParody
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) July 6, 2025

7/
The World Trade Organization (WTO) has been gutted. It’s time for BRICS to lead a new trade vision—one rooted in justice, equality, and cooperation.
📘 Start here: Rethinking Trade: A Blueprint for a Just and Thriving Global Economy
👉 https://t.co/8aGH1Vh2WL
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) July 6, 2025

10/
The Kalkiism Research Center in Kathmandu is doing the most advanced work on this. They propose a policy roadmap for 20%+ annual growth for Global South nations.
📘 The 20% Growth Revolution
👉 https://t.co/sv9xIB8J74 @ICCAHOPT_BRICS @yesBRICS @herati88
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) July 6, 2025

BRICS Needs To Step Into the U.S. Immigration Crisis https://t.co/lSiz2A9gY4
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) July 6, 2025

How 100,000 Drones Could Reshape the Russia-Ukraine War: A Strategic Analysis

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has repeatedly emphasized the pivotal role that drones play in Ukraine’s defense strategy against Russia’s full-scale invasion. The potential deployment of 100,000 drones would mark a major escalation in asymmetric warfare. However, the scale of impact would depend on various factors—drone types, operational strategies, Russian countermeasures, and geopolitical context. Based on current data and the evolving battlefield, here’s an in-depth analysis of what such a drone campaign could achieve:

1. Scale and Nature of Damage

Destruction of High-Value Military Assets:
Ukraine’s “Operation Spider’s Web” in June 2025 showcased the potency of drone strikes. In that operation, 117 drones were reported to have damaged or destroyed 13–41 Russian aircraft, including strategic bombers such as the Tu-95 and Tu-22M, inflicting an estimated $7 billion in losses. Extrapolating from this, a fleet of 100,000 drones could:
- Target thousands of aircraft (bombers, fighters, surveillance planes).
- Destroy or disable armored vehicles, including tanks and APCs.
- Strike command and control centers, ammunition depots, and fuel storage facilities.
Personnel Casualties and Operational Disruption:
FPV (first-person-view) and kamikaze drones have reportedly accounted for 60–70% of Russian equipment losses and up to 80% of battlefield casualties in certain areas. A full-scale drone offensive could:
- Disrupt supply chains.
- Target infantry concentrations and artillery positions.
- Sever battlefield communications and resupply routes.
Strategic Strikes Deep into Russia:
Ukraine has developed long-range drones capable of striking targets up to 3,000 km away. Previous strikes have hit refineries in Murmansk and Siberia, highlighting Ukraine’s reach. A drone force of this size could:
- Repeatedly hit airfields, refineries, and arms factories far behind enemy lines.
- Force Russia to reallocate critical air defense and intelligence assets.

2. Economic and Strategic Impact

Cost-Efficiency:
Ukrainian drones, costing between $400–$1,000, can destroy assets worth millions or billions. For example, a Tu-95 bomber costs over $100 million.
- The estimated cost for 100,000 drones: $40 million to $100 million.
- Potential damage inflicted: Tens to hundreds of billions in destroyed Russian military hardware and industrial capacity.
Attrition and Resource Drain on Russia:
With drone launches already exceeding 1,000 per week, Russian air defenses are strained. A leap to 100,000 drones would:
- Overwhelm Russian electronic warfare systems and missile interceptors.
- Force Russia to burn through expensive counter-drone measures (e.g., $130,000 per Coyote interceptor).
- Divert resources from ground operations to homeland defense.
Psychological and Political Fallout:
Zelensky has stated that these drone campaigns highlight Russia’s vulnerabilities and aim to “push it toward diplomacy.” A sustained drone assault could:
- Shake confidence in the Kremlin’s ability to defend its territory.
- Undermine morale among Russian troops and the public.
- Pressure Putin domestically and internationally as infrastructure and symbolic targets are repeatedly hit.

3. Tactical and Operational Advantages

Swarm Deployment and Precision Strikes:
Large swarms can overwhelm defenses. FPV drones are now regularly used to:
- Hunt tanks, artillery, and radar systems.
- Execute precision strikes on dug-in positions with minimal collateral damage.
Real-Time Reconnaissance and Targeting:
Recon drones offer near-constant aerial surveillance. When paired with artillery or kamikaze drones, they:
- Enable highly accurate “sensor-to-shooter” loops.
- Expand contested no-man’s-land zones by making static positions untenable.
Naval Warfare:
Ukraine’s naval drones, including the “Sea Baby”, have effectively neutralized Russia’s Black Sea Fleet near Ukrainian shores. Adding drone boats or amphibious drones to the mix could:
- Harass Russian naval resupply lines.
- Blockade key ports.
- Threaten commercial and military shipping in contested waters.

4. Limitations and Russian Countermeasures

Electronic Warfare and Jamming:
Russia has adapted quickly, using jamming, spoofing, and advanced EW systems. Ukraine reportedly loses 10,000 drones per month to EW alone. To sustain a 100,000-drone campaign:
- Ukraine would need AI-guided, anti-jamming navigation systems (e.g., neural networks).
- Drone redundancy and fail-safe programming would be crucial.
Production and Logistical Hurdles:
While Ukraine produced over 1 million drones in 2024 and targets 4–5 million in 2025, deploying 100,000 drones:
- Requires massive logistical coordination.
- Needs trained operators, robust supply chains, and secure communication networks.
- Could be hampered by component shortages (especially if reliant on Chinese parts or foreign electronics).
Risk of Russian Escalation:
After Ukraine’s June 2025 drone strike, Russia retaliated with 479–550 drones and missiles, mainly targeting civilian energy infrastructure.
- A larger drone campaign could prompt more devastating counterattacks.
- U.S. officials have warned of Russia possibly expanding its target list or revisiting nuclear posturing, especially if Western systems are implicated.

5. Strategic Vision Behind Zelensky’s Push

Asymmetric Warfare Doctrine:
Ukraine compensates for its inferior airpower and artillery through scalable, affordable drone warfare.
- Zelensky’s call for 100,000 drones, supported by allies like the UK, reflects this strategy of technological offset.
International Support and Production Partnerships:
Ukraine’s efforts are bolstered by partnerships with domestic firms like Skyeton and foreign companies like Swift Beat. However:
- U.S. aid diversions (e.g., 20,000 anti-drone missiles sent to the Middle East) could delay scaling up.
- Long-term self-reliance in drone manufacturing is now seen as a strategic imperative.
Long-Term Military and Diplomatic Implications:
- Sustained drone pressure could deter Russian offensives, forcing Moscow into a defensive posture.
- Continuous strikes on energy or symbolic targets could weaken Russia’s international position without triggering full-scale NATO involvement.
- However, the Kremlin may react more aggressively if it perceives Western complicity or existential threats to its nuclear assets.

Conclusion

A fleet of 100,000 drones could inflict devastating material, operational, and psychological damage on the Russian military. From destroying billions in equipment and decimating supply lines to weakening morale and forcing political recalculations, such a campaign aligns with Ukraine’s asymmetric strategy. Yet, logistical burdens, Russian countermeasures, and the risk of escalation introduce significant challenges.

The outcome hinges on drone type and technology, deployment strategy, and Western support. If effectively executed, it could mark a turning point in the war and bring Zelensky closer to his stated goal: forcing Russia to the negotiating table.

Sources:

100,000 ड्रोन कैसे रूस-यूक्रेन युद्ध को बदल सकते हैं: एक रणनीतिक विश्लेषण

यूक्रेनी राष्ट्रपति वोलोदिमिर ज़ेलेंस्की बार-बार इस बात पर ज़ोर दे चुके हैं कि ड्रोन यूक्रेन की रक्षा रणनीति में एक केंद्रीय भूमिका निभा रहे हैं। अगर यूक्रेन 100,000 ड्रोन तैनात करता है, तो यह विषम युद्ध (asymmetric warfare) में एक नया मोड़ ला सकता है। हालाँकि, इस तरह की रणनीति की प्रभावशीलता इस बात पर निर्भर करेगी कि ड्रोन किस प्रकार के हैं, उनका संचालन कैसे किया जाता है, रूस की प्रतिक्रिया क्या होती है, और व्यापक भू-राजनीतिक परिप्रेक्ष्य क्या है। इस लेख में इस संभावित अभियान के प्रभाव का विस्तृत विश्लेषण प्रस्तुत किया गया है।

1. हानि का पैमाना और स्वरूप

उच्च-मूल्य सैन्य लक्ष्यों का विनाश:
जून 2025 में यूक्रेन द्वारा की गई "ऑपरेशन स्पाइडर वेब" ने दिखाया कि ड्रोन कितने प्रभावी हो सकते हैं। उस अभियान में 117 ड्रोन ने 13–41 रूसी विमानों को क्षतिग्रस्त या नष्ट कर दिया था, जिसमें Tu-95 और Tu-22M जैसे रणनीतिक बॉम्बर्स शामिल थे। रूस को इस हमले में अनुमानतः $7 बिलियन का नुकसान हुआ।
अगर इसी रणनीति को 100,000 ड्रोन तक बढ़ाया जाए, तो लक्ष्य हो सकते हैं:
- सैकड़ों विमान (बॉम्बर्स, फाइटर्स, निगरानी विमान)
- आर्मर्ड व्हीकल्स जैसे टैंक और एपीसी
- कमांड और कंट्रोल सेंटर्स, गोला-बारूद डिपो, और ईंधन भंडार
सैनिक हताहत और संचालन में व्यवधान:
एफपीवी और आत्मघाती ड्रोन ने कई युद्धों में रूसी उपकरणों की 60–70% हानि और 80% तक सैनिक हताहत का कारण बने हैं। 100,000 ड्रोन:
- रसद लाइनों को बाधित कर सकते हैं
- सैनिक जमाव और आर्टिलरी पॉइंट्स को निशाना बना सकते हैं
- कम्युनिकेशन नेटवर्क को ध्वस्त कर सकते हैं
रूस के भीतर गहराई तक स्ट्राइक:
यूक्रेन के पास अब ऐसे लंबी दूरी के ड्रोन हैं जो 3,000 किमी तक लक्ष्य भेद सकते हैं। पहले भी साइबेरिया और मुरमांस्क के तेल रिफाइनरियों पर हमले हो चुके हैं।
100,000 ड्रोन:
- हवाई ठिकानों, हथियार फैक्ट्रियों और औद्योगिक केंद्रों पर बार-बार हमला कर सकते हैं
- रूस को आंतरिक सुरक्षा के लिए संसाधन मोड़ने के लिए मजबूर कर सकते हैं

2. आर्थिक और रणनीतिक प्रभाव

लागत-प्रभावशीलता:
यूक्रेनी ड्रोन की लागत मात्र $400–$1,000 होती है, जबकि वे $100 मिलियन से अधिक कीमत वाले रूसी उपकरणों को नष्ट कर सकते हैं (जैसे Tu-95)।
- 100,000 ड्रोन का अनुमानित खर्च: $40–100 मिलियन
- संभावित क्षति: $10–100 बिलियन से अधिक
रूसी संसाधनों पर दबाव:
यूक्रेन पहले ही हर हफ्ते 1,000+ ड्रोन लॉन्च कर रहा है। 100,000 की लहर:
- रूसी रक्षा प्रणालियों को अधिभारित कर सकती है
- रूस को महंगे काउंटर-ड्रोन उपायों का उपयोग करने पर मजबूर करेगी (जैसे $130,000 प्रति Coyote इंटरसेप्टर)
- अन्य सैन्य प्राथमिकताओं से ध्यान हटा सकती है
मनोवैज्ञानिक और राजनीतिक असर:
ज़ेलेंस्की ने कहा है कि ये हमले रूस की कमजोरी उजागर करते हैं और उसे "कूटनीति की ओर धकेलते हैं"।
- रूसी जनता और सैनिकों का मनोबल गिर सकता है
- पुतिन की सैन्य क्षमताओं पर जनता का विश्वास कम हो सकता है
- घरेलू दबाव और अंतरराष्ट्रीय आलोचना बढ़ सकती है

3. सैन्य रणनीति और संचालन के लाभ

झुंड (Swarm) रणनीति:
यूक्रेन पहले से ही छोटे FPV ड्रोन का उपयोग कर प्रेसिजन स्ट्राइक कर रहा है। 100,000 ड्रोन:
- रक्षा प्रणालियों को संख्यात्मक रूप से मात दे सकते हैं
- कम समय में लक्ष्यों को ट्रैक और नष्ट कर सकते हैं
रियल टाइम टोही (Surveillance):
निगरानी ड्रोन से निरंतर जानकारी मिलती है जो:
- तोपखाने और अन्य हथियारों को सटीक लक्ष्यों पर हमला करने में मदद करती है
- "ग्रे ज़ोन" (नो मैन्स लैंड) को फैलाती है जिससे रूस की गति सीमित हो जाती है
नौसैनिक असर:
यूक्रेन के "सी बेबी" जैसे नौसैनिक ड्रोन ने रूस के ब्लैक सी फ्लीट को सीमित कर दिया है। 100,000 में से कुछ ड्रोन:
- बंदरगाहों को अवरुद्ध कर सकते हैं
- रूसी जहाजों पर हमले कर सकते हैं
- समुद्री व्यापार को बाधित कर सकते हैं

4. सीमाएं और रूसी प्रतिकार

इलेक्ट्रॉनिक वॉरफेयर (जैमिंग):
रूस ने ड्रोन को निष्क्रिय करने के लिए अत्याधुनिक जैमिंग और स्पूफिंग सिस्टम विकसित किए हैं।
- यूक्रेन हर महीने लगभग 10,000 ड्रोन खो देता है
- उच्च तकनीक जैसे AI आधारित नेविगेशन सिस्टम आवश्यक होंगे
उत्पादन और आपूर्ति की बाधाएं:
यूक्रेन ने 2024 में 10 लाख ड्रोन बनाए और 2025 में 40–50 लाख का लक्ष्य है। लेकिन:
- 100,000 ड्रोन के लिए आपूर्ति श्रृंखला, प्रशिक्षित ऑपरेटर और संचार नेटवर्क जरूरी हैं
- विदेशी कलपुर्जों पर निर्भरता एक कमजोरी बन सकती है
रूसी प्रतिक्रिया का खतरा:
जून 2025 के ड्रोन हमले के बाद रूस ने 479–550 ड्रोन और मिसाइलों से बदला लिया, मुख्यतः नागरिक अवसंरचना को निशाना बनाकर।
- अगर यूक्रेन ड्रोन हमलों को और बढ़ाता है, तो रूस बड़े पैमाने पर जवाबी हमले कर सकता है
- अमेरिका ने भी चेतावनी दी है कि रूस इसका परमाणु प्रतिक्रिया के रूप में गलत अर्थ निकाल सकता है

5. ज़ेलेंस्की की रणनीति का दृष्टिकोण

विषम युद्ध का मॉडल:
रूस की तुलना में वायु शक्ति और तोपखाने की कमी को यूक्रेन ड्रोन तकनीक से भर रहा है।
- 100,000 ड्रोन की मांग इसी रणनीति का हिस्सा है, जिसमें ब्रिटेन जैसे देशों का सहयोग शामिल है
अंतरराष्ट्रीय समर्थन और साझेदारियां:
यूक्रेन ने Skyeton और Swift Beat जैसी कंपनियों से साझेदारी की है। लेकिन:
- 20,000 अमेरिकी एंटी-ड्रोन मिसाइलों का मध्य पूर्व में भेजा जाना चिंताजनक है
- दीर्घकालिक समाधान के लिए घरेलू उत्पादन क्षमताओं को और बढ़ाना जरूरी होगा
भविष्य के रणनीतिक प्रभाव:
- रूस के हमले की योजना को महंगा और अस्थिर बना सकते हैं
- यह रूसी परमाणु रणनीति को पुनः सोचने पर मजबूर कर सकता है
- हालांकि, पश्चिमी भागीदारी दिखने पर रूस की प्रतिक्रिया अधिक उग्र हो सकती है

निष्कर्ष

100,000 ड्रोन रूस को रणनीतिक, आर्थिक और मनोवैज्ञानिक स्तर पर भारी नुकसान पहुँचा सकते हैं।

अरबों डॉलर के हथियार और सैन्य ढांचे को नष्ट किया जा सकता है
रसद लाइनों को बाधित किया जा सकता है
रूसी सैनिकों और नागरिकों का मनोबल गिराया जा सकता है

यह सब ज़ेलेंस्की के उस लक्ष्य की ओर इशारा करता है—रूस को वार्ता की मेज़ पर लाना।
हालाँकि, यह सब कुछ यूक्रेन की उत्पादन क्षमता, ड्रोन तकनीक, रणनीति, और रूस की प्रतिक्रिया पर निर्भर करेगा।

स्रोत:

NYC mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani's professor father claimed Hitler inspired by Abraham Lincoln
Consumer Alert: Cross-Border Tariff Fight Could Spike Prices on Everything You Buy
Haunting nuclear map shows how strikes would kill 75% of US population nearly 75% of the population could be wiped out. Cities spanning from the east coast to the midwest and west coast would likely be in the crosshairs, resulting in an estimated 250 million immediate deaths........ Major metropolitan areas such as New York, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Houston, and Washington DC are predicted to be hit first. ......... The map suggests that only a few areas would avoid immediate annihilation - Western Texas, parts of Nevada, Michigan, and Wisconsin. However, these areas would also become uninhabitable shortly after the nuclear onslaught. ......... The map was created using data from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), including information on blast radius, fallout patterns, radiation exposure levels based on detonation location, and population density in affected areas....... US military facilities would be among the primary targets in a nuclear strike. Infrastructure such as power plants, transportation hubs, oil refineries, and crucial communication centers would also be at risk if bombs were deployed......... Russia currently holds the most nuclear warheads globally, with around 5,580. The US is not far behind with 5,044, while China has between 500 and 600. ...... The harrowing insight created by Halcyon Maps paints a dire picture, revealing that

a land-based nuclear missile fired from Russia or China could slam into the US mainland in a mere 30 minutes.

However, the situation becomes even more critical
if a submarine-based missile is launched off the American coast - the attack time would be slashed to just 15 minutes.
....... "The risk of nuclear war has increased dramatically in the past two years as the US and Russia have abandoned long-standing nuclear arms control treaties, started to develop new kinds of nuclear weapons and expanded the circumstances in which they might use nuclear weapons."

Southern Ocean current reverses for first time, signalling risk of climate system collapse
Six months into the Trump presidency, here’s the good, the bad, and the ugly about the economy
How Trump's megabill could slam the job market
‘It’s a stench of corruption’: Norm Eisen warns of an ethics crisis with Trump’s second term
Ukraine war latest: Drones attack Russia's Black Sea Fleet; Russian pipelines explode in country's Far East, HUR says
Russia and Ukraine trade drone strikes as Kyiv signs deals to boost drone production
Musk should stay out of politics, treasury secretary says after ‘America’ party news
Elon Musk says he's formed the 'America Party.' Mark Cuban and Anthony Scaramucci are interested.
Republicans have empowered a lunatic who barely won the election | Opinion Republicans in Congress have just passed Trump’s “Big Beautiful Bill.” Widely dubbed the cruelest piece of legislation in US history post Civil War, it will:

・Remove over $1 trillion from Medicaid, which will leave 12 to 14 million Americans without health care;
・Adjust Medicaid payments so that most rural hospitals will have to close their doors;
・Slash Food Stamps and food assistance for approximately 42 million Americans, mostly children and senior citizens;
・Give and extend already unaffordable, already budget-busting, damn-near-theft tax cuts to wealthy Americans and corporations; while
・Increasing the already-bloated federal deficit by $3.4 trillion, which will affect interest rates and our childrens’ cost of repaying the national debt to foreign governments, including China.
What about the political backlash, you ask? Ever so clever, republicans delayed cuts to medical coverage until after the midterms, so they won’t suffer any professional or political consequences. .............

the bill specifically funds a new American police state. Draped in anti-immigrant language, the bill creates a standing army of masked ICE agents, and funds enough of them to terrorize any city in the nation. We’ve all seen the videos of ICE goons beating migrants in front of their children; any one of them could have been recruited from Trump’s applicant pool of pardoned felons.

......... It also provides $45 billion to build new immigration detention centers, a 265 percent annual budget increase to ICE’s current detention budget. This funding level is a 62 percent __larger budget__ than the __entire federal prison__ system, where 155,933 inmates are currently incarcerated. .......... After Trump was somehow re-elected, despite his well-publicized attempt to block the transfer of power when he lost, he acquitted or pardoned rioters who were convicted of violent felonies and personal violence against police officers during Trump’s January 6, 2021, uprising. Here, Trump at least gets a nod for sinister efficiency: J6 cultists who thrive on hate in service to Trump needed something to do. They were already pumped up and armed and in search of political violence, why not give ‘em an ICE badge? If they were recorded while beating capital police with vigor, or carrying a noose for Mike Pence because he honored the Constitution over Trump, all the better. .......... Trump now has $1 trillion—with a T— to spend on his defense budget. Anyone wondering how he’s going to spend it, after shamefully withholding military aid and weaponry Congress already approved for Ukraine, should consider Pete Hegseth. Hegseth recently testified before Congress and described how national defense, under Trump, is transitioning from a force fighting foreign threats into a “domestic affair:” ........ Pan wide for Trump’s new gulag agenda: ICE facilities where migrants, as well as political prisoners and journalists, are baked alive, fed to the reptiles, or denaturalized and deported. .......... With this bill’s passage, Trump has now been handed the most heavily funded law enforcement agency in United States history. This happened just after the Supreme Court handed him the most presidential power in the last 100 years of history by 1. Declaring him immune from criminal laws; and 2. Blocking federal judges from stopping him through the issuance of nationwide injunctive relief. ......... Not only did SCOTUS tell a criminal president that he was immune from criminal prosecution for anything related to being a president (fyi, rage tweeting childish threats that endanger our national security at 3 a.m. is related to being president; intentionally devaluing the US dollar to boost his own bitcoin grift is related to being president; ordering the execution of all redheads for “national security” purposes would be related to being president), by blocking nationwide injunctions, they also knee-capped federal judges doing their best to block America’s Hitler from doing his worst. .......... In service to Trump, Republicans on the high court banned injunctive relief, despite it’s use throughout the last 100 years, with no discussion or thought about how, under a criminally insane president who wants to put military tanks on every city street, it might have been important. ......... Trump was not elected “by a mandate.” He eked out his win by a margin of only 1.5 percent over Harris, while 91 million voters were so disgusted by the election, or so disillusioned, or so stoned, they didn’t bother to vote. .......... They know there won’t be a real mid-term election. ......... If anyone, including SCOTUS and voters, doubted Trump’s death grip on the Republican Party, this should remove all doubt. Republicans will die with Trump, or democracy will die with them.

6: Trade

He is only off by 17,000,000. https://t.co/aAjr6jjbNl
— Congressman Brendan Boyle (@RepBrendanBoyle) July 6, 2025

Grounded Greatness: The Case For Smart Surface Transit In Future Cities
The Garden Of Last Debates (novel)
Deported (novel)
Empty Country (novel)
Trump’s Default: The Mist Of Empire (novel)
The 20% Growth Revolution: Nepal’s Path to Prosperity Through Kalkiism
Rethinking Trade: A Blueprint for a Just and Thriving Global Economy
The $500 Billion Pivot: How the India-US Alliance Can Reshape Global Trade
Trump’s Trade War
Peace For Taiwan Is Possible
Formula For Peace In Ukraine
A 2T Cut
Are We Frozen in Time?: Tech Progress, Social Stagnation
The Last Age of War, The First Age of Peace: Lord Kalki, Prophecies, and the Path to Global Redemption
AOC 2028: : The Future of American Progressivism

The world is dangerously close to a new crisis
MAGA Congressional Candidate Calls Texas Floods ‘Fake’: It’s ‘Murder’
Ukraine to receive hundreds of thousands of drones in US deal – Zelenskyy Quote from Zelenskyy: "It will provide Ukraine with hundreds of thousands of drones as early as this year, on special terms, and even significantly more drones the following year. This includes interceptor drones, which are clearly our priority." ......... Details: He emphasised that the task for the state, the defence forces of Ukraine and all businesses working in this area is to increase weekly results in the production and use of interceptor drones........ Background: In an evening address on 5 July, Zelenskyy said that his conversation with US President Donald Trump, which took place the day before, was the best and most productive in the history of communication between the leaders.

Trump team moves goalposts on tariffs again Bessent told CNN's "State of the Union" that the Trump administration would be sending out letters to 100 smaller countries “saying that if you don't move things along, then on August 1st, you will boomerang back to your April 2nd tariff level.” ........ the return of tariffs of between 10 and 50 percent on dozens of countries. It comes as Trump administration officials increasingly hint at difficulties in nailing down deals. ......... Since announcing sweeping so-called reciprocal tariffs, the Trump administration has only signed agreements with the United Kingdom and Vietnam, as well as a limited deal with China that saw both countries walk back sky-high tit-for-tat tariff rates temporarily. The U.S. is also reportedly close to reaching a deal with India, and the European Union, which Trump once accused of slow-walking negotiations, appears willing to make significant concessions for a deal. ........ what's great about having President Trump on our side is he's created maximum leverage," Bessent said. ........... Trump told reporters Friday that letters could be sent to a dozen countries as soon as Monday, with tariff rates ranging from ”'60 or 70 percent to 10 or 20 percent.” He said the fees would take effect Aug. 1,

while again falsely claiming that foreign countries pay the tariffs — which are actually paid by U.S. importers.

Donald Trump signs disaster declaration for deadly Texas floods

Russian weapons base explodes as Ukraine pummels Putin's prized assets in devastating blow
How Healthcare Cuts in the ‘Big, Beautiful Bill’ Will Affect Americans
Elon Musk's new party: who has declared interest? Mark Cuban and Anthony Scaramucci. ....... Posting on X, Marc Cuban, a billionaire businessman and TV personality suggested he was interested in the party, sharing fireworks emojis then writing: "I work with [Center for Competitive Democracy]. They will help you get on ballots. That is their mission." ...... Anthony Scaramucci, who was fired by Donald Trump just 10 days into the job as White House communications director in 2017, wrote: "I would like to meet to discuss." ....... Social media personality Brian Krassenstein, who has over 900,000 followers, wrote: "Awesome! Where can we see more information?" ........ Roger Stone, a longtime Republican strategist and Trump loyalist, said: "I have huge respect for @elonmusk and everything he has done for free speech and to ferret out waste fraud and corruption in federal spending, but I would rather see him pursue his efforts at electoral reform within the Republican Party primaries rather than having a new party splitting the vote of sane people and letting the Marxist Democrats gain control again."

Is this the America Party platform?

-reduce debt, responsible spending only
-modernize military with ai/robotics
-pro tech, accelerate to win in ai
-less regulation across board but especially in energy
-free speech
-pro natalist
-centrist policies everywhere else

If so…
— Tyler Palmer (@tyler__palmer) July 5, 2025

The Tesla Of Political Parties https://t.co/NpochJhLyk
— Paramendra Kumar Bhagat (@paramendra) July 6, 2025

Opinion: Trump’s trade brinkmanship imperils market stability As the United States and China inch toward formalizing the outcomes of their recent economic talks in London, markets are sending a clear signal: they want stability, not another season of tariff theatrics. Yet the Trump administration’s renewed protectionist tilt, including the looming July 9 deadline for punitive tariffs, risks derailing a fragile recovery and undermining American economic resilience. ........ Economic coercion has failed to deliver strategic outcomes. Markets, manufacturers and consumers are all still paying the price of the last trade war. ......... Rare earths remain a critical node in this standoff. China refines nearly 80 percent of the global supply — inputs essential to American electric vehicles, semiconductors and defense technologies. When Beijing halted export approvals earlier this year, U.S. manufacturers faced mounting delays and soaring input costs. ........ The reversal eases a significant bottleneck and offers inflation relief. In exchange, China will regain access to U.S. manufacturing inputs and regulatory clarity — a win for both sides, but especially for U.S. firms squeezed by global supply chain frictions. ........ export volumes from China had fallen nearly 50 percent year-over-year in May, citing tightened controls......... markets reward policy clarity, even in geopolitically charged commodity markets. ......... Yet the calm is temporary. Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariff framework proposes up to 50 percent duties on countries that fail to sign new bilateral deals by July 9. A 90-day grace period has been offered, but this is brinkmanship disguised as strategy. And if the deadline passes without a broader deal, the tariffs snap back — with potentially damaging ripple effects. .......... The last trade escalation offers a cautionary tale. Tariffs on Chinese goods hit 145 percent; Beijing responded with levies up to 125 percent. American manufacturers endured record costs, while exporters in both countries lost access to reliable markets. The U.S. goods trade deficit with China didn’t shrink — it widened to $396 billion in 2024. Meanwhile, American farmers faced oversupply, and consumers bore the burden through higher prices. ........... Markets are signaling that certainty matters — not tariff theatrics. The contrast is clear: a modest trade framework sparks calm; tariff threats inject volatility. That is the heartbeat investors care about. ........... Only now, as trade talks signal détente, has the S&P 500 rallied and oil futures stabilized. Markets know the difference between real strategy and performative populism. So do the businesses that depend on open trade. .........

Trump’s tariffs didn’t reshore factories or rebalance the trade deficit. What they did do was erode U.S. credibility with allies, invite World Trade Organization scrutiny and distort global supply chains. If the objective was to discipline China’s behavior, the evidence shows failure. What has worked — albeit modestly — is targeted cooperation, regulatory certainty and consistent enforcement of existing rules.

.......... Legal uncertainty still clouds the picture. A recent federal court ruling in V.O.S. Selections v. United States raises questions about whether the White House even has the authority to implement broad-based tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. If the decision is upheld, it will undercut the legal rationale for Trump’s tariff agenda — and perhaps prompt overdue congressional clarity on trade powers. ......... The broader lesson is clear: economic interdependence isn’t weakness — it’s leverage. The U.S. and China will remain strategic competitors, but durable competition requires rules, not impulsive penalty regimes that backfire on domestic producers. ..........
protectionism is not a patriotic virtue but an economic deadweight.
...... For now, Washington would do well to recognize what the S&P already has: stability is strength. And the best way to keep markets calm is not through tariffs — but through smart, disciplined diplomacy.

MAGA Melts Down as Musk Files Paperwork for ‘America Party’

Pages

Sunday, July 06, 2025

6: Trump

BRICS Needs To Step Into the U.S. Immigration Crisis

Immigration Is a Human Rights Issue—Not a National One

From Club to Catalyst: What BRICS Must Become

America Was Built By Immigrants. It Still Runs On Them.

The Real Solution: Documentation, Not Deportation

Failed U.S. Policies, Global Consequences

Trade Needs a New Paradigm

A Decade to Achieve Parity: The Technology Advantage

A Call to BRICS: Step Into the Fire

केवल बयान नहीं, ठोस कार्रवाई ज़रूरी है

अमेरिका प्रवासियों से बना है, और अब भी चलता है

समाधान क्या है? कागज़ दो, बंदूक नहीं

दक्षिण अमेरिका के प्रवासी अमेरिका की नीतियों के शिकार हैं

व्यापार को भी नई दिशा चाहिए

तकनीक से बदलेगा दक्षिण का भाग्य

यह केवल अमेरिका की नीति नहीं, Global South की चुनौती है

How 100,000 Drones Could Reshape the Russia-Ukraine War: A Strategic Analysis

How 100,000 Drones Could Reshape the Russia-Ukraine War: A Strategic Analysis

1. Scale and Nature of Damage

2. Economic and Strategic Impact

3. Tactical and Operational Advantages

4. Limitations and Russian Countermeasures

5. Strategic Vision Behind Zelensky’s Push

Conclusion

100,000 ड्रोन कैसे रूस-यूक्रेन युद्ध को बदल सकते हैं: एक रणनीतिक विश्लेषण

1. हानि का पैमाना और स्वरूप

2. आर्थिक और रणनीतिक प्रभाव

3. सैन्य रणनीति और संचालन के लाभ

4. सीमाएं और रूसी प्रतिकार

5. ज़ेलेंस्की की रणनीति का दृष्टिकोण

निष्कर्ष

a land-based nuclear missile fired from Russia or China could slam into the US mainland in a mere 30 minutes.

if a submarine-based missile is launched off the American coast - the attack time would be slashed to just 15 minutes.

6: Trade

while again falsely claiming that foreign countries pay the tariffs — which are actually paid by U.S. importers.

protectionism is not a patriotic virtue but an economic deadweight.