The Power of the Iranian Diaspora: Preventing War by Confronting the Truth About Islam

A Blueprint for Iran’s Democratic Transition: Masih Alinejad and Reza Pahlavi in a Dual-Track Interim Government
The Great Cosmic Prank: Why Allah Might Just Be the Universe's Worst Knock-Knock Joke
February 14 March For Iran Across The World

The Power of the Iranian Diaspora: Preventing War by Confronting the Truth About Islam

In an era of escalating tensions in the Middle East, the Iranian diaspora holds a unique and potent position to avert the horrors of war. Wars, by their very nature, are ugly and messy affairs, fraught with unintended consequences—even those deemed just. The forces of good must exhaust every peaceful avenue before resorting to conflict. Yet, when all options are depleted, a just war demands not only moral righteousness but also superior military strategy and might. The Islamic Republic of Iran, a regime notorious for its brutality, has recently slaughtered thousands—some estimates suggest tens of thousands—of its own citizens. This violence is not an aberration but a continuation of a longstanding doctrine rooted in the foundations of Islam's entry into Iran: submit or perish.

The Historical Roots of Tyranny

To understand the current regime's actions, one must recognize that this "stay Muslim or die" ethos is not a modern invention. It is the very mechanism by which Islam was imposed upon Iran centuries ago and how it maintains its grip today. Being Muslim, in this context, equates to absolute obedience. Protesting in the streets is seen not as civic dissent but as apostasy, rendering the protester worthy of death. This logic is the bedrock of the faith as practiced under the Islamic Republic. The Iranian diaspora, despite its courage in mobilizing globally, often shies away from this uncomfortable truth, inadvertently making war more likely by failing to address the ideological core of the tyranny.

The same coercive logic extends beyond Iran's borders. Neighbors like the UAE and Qatar face threats of missile strikes on bustling hubs such as downtown Dubai. Similarly, the Islamic Republic's approach to the Palestinians is instrumental: they are valued only insofar as they sustain an unyielding hostility toward Israel. Co-existence has never been part of the equation; domination is the goal.

A Global Call to Action

On February 14, the Iranian diaspora demonstrated its strength, gathering in the world's largest cities with crowds swelling to as many as two million. This collective power could be the key to preventing war—if wielded to confront the facts about Islam head-on. Islam, in this view, is not a religion of peace but an anti-religion, with Allah not representing the true God. To discern if the Devil is an active spiritual force, one need only examine the expansive infrastructure of tyranny emanating from Iran. It peddles illusions—yellow hay disguised as French fries—trapping adherents in a web of deception.

God is omnipotent, capable of intervening in human history. Allah, by contrast, lacks such power. Prophets earn their title through prophecy, yet Muhammad is attributed none. Indeed, there is no verifiable historical Muhammad. Protesting in Tehran's streets is akin to petitioning the Ayatollah for liberty—an absurdity, as he himself is enslaved to this deceptive force. How can a slave grant freedom?

The Path to True Liberation

The truly evil do not negotiate; they fight to the end, rendering war inevitable. But the misguided—comprising the vast majority of Muslims worldwide—have the chance to redirect their path. They have been fed a pack of lies, seeking spiritual nourishment but receiving only distortion. Allah offers a warped depiction of divinity. Islam glorifies death, whereas true religions celebrate life and foster co-existence. Islam, however, is inherently incompatible with peaceful coexistence.

The Iranian diaspora, marching valiantly against Iran's tyranny, must target its true source. How did Islam infiltrate the proud nation of Iran? Through the ultimatum: convert or die. That is the essence of tyranny. To break free, one must sever the bond with this source—the Devil himself. Self-liberation is the only path; no external force, be it a B2 bomber or an aircraft carrier, can achieve it without internal resolve.

By renouncing Islam as an anti-religion, the diaspora can negate the possibility of war, choosing life over death, truth over deception, and freedom over bondage. The time to act is now, before the cycle of violence engulfs us all.

The True Path to Liberation: Why Self-Emancipation Renders Military Might Obsolete

In the face of tyranny and oppression, the allure of external intervention—be it through advanced weaponry like B2 bombers or formidable naval assets such as aircraft carriers—often seems like a swift solution. Yet, history and human experience teach us a profound truth: no amount of military power can truly liberate a people who remain chained internally. True freedom begins within, by severing the bonds that hold one captive to destructive forces. Only through this internal revolution can the need for external force be entirely negated.

The Limits of External Liberation

Imagine a scenario where oppressed populations look to the skies for salvation, expecting stealth bombers to dismantle regimes or carrier strike groups to enforce change from afar. While such tools possess undeniable might, capable of altering landscapes and toppling governments, they fall short in addressing the root of subjugation. Liberation imposed from outside is, at best, temporary and superficial. It may remove a dictator or disrupt a system, but without a collective internal awakening, the chains of fear, ideology, or spiritual bondage persist.

This "bond with The Devil," as it has been aptly described, represents not just a metaphorical evil but the deep-seated allegiances to oppressive doctrines, false beliefs, or tyrannical ideologies that perpetuate suffering. In contexts like authoritarian regimes or radical theocracies, this bond manifests as blind obedience, enforced conformity, and a glorification of death over life. Military interventions, no matter how precise or overwhelming, cannot break these invisible shackles. They might bomb buildings, but they cannot bomb beliefs. Without the people's active participation in their own emancipation, any victory is hollow, prone to resurgence of the same evils under new guises.

The Power of Internal Liberation

True liberation demands a personal and collective reckoning. It requires individuals to confront and renounce the forces that bind them—whether those are religious fanaticism, political indoctrination, or cultural myths that prioritize submission over sovereignty. This act of breaking the bond is not passive; it is an assertion of agency. "Liberate yourself," the call goes, emphasizing that freedom is not granted but claimed.

When this happens en masse, the transformation is revolutionary. A population that collectively rejects its oppressors' narratives undermines the very foundation of tyranny. Protests evolve from pleas for reform into declarations of independence. Ideological strongholds crumble not from airstrikes but from a tidal wave of awakened wills. In such a scenario, the oppressors lose their grip, isolated and exposed without the compliance of the masses.

Rendering Military Intervention Unnecessary

Herein lies the paradox and the promise: if a people break their bond with The Devil on a massive scale, the instruments of war become redundant. B2 bombers, with their stealth and precision-guided munitions, and aircraft carriers, projecting power across oceans, are tools designed for conflict. But when internal liberation preempts the need for external confrontation, these become symbols of a path not taken—a war averted.

Consider historical precedents. The fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 was not the result of aerial bombardments but of a groundswell of public demand for freedom, amplified by peaceful demonstrations. Similarly, the Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia unfolded without foreign military involvement, driven by citizens reclaiming their dignity. In these cases, mass self-liberation made violent intervention obsolete, leading to swift and relatively bloodless change.

In today's world, this principle applies to ongoing struggles against authoritarianism. Whether in the Middle East, Asia, or elsewhere, populations ensnared by "devilish" ideologies—those that glorify death, suppress dissent, and expand through coercion—can tip the scales. By renouncing these bonds collectively, they not only free themselves but also prevent the escalation that draws in global powers, sparing the world from the messiness of war.

A Call to Collective Action

The message is clear: do not wait for saviors in the form of flying fortresses or floating arsenals. Liberation is an inside job, one that requires courage, introspection, and unity. Break the bond en masse, and watch as the necessity for military might evaporates. In doing so, you not only secure your own freedom but contribute to a more peaceful world, where conflicts are resolved through human resolve rather than firepower.

The choice is yours: cling to the chains and invite the bombers, or shatter them and render such tools unnecessary. True victory lies not in conquest but in self-mastery. The time for liberation is now—starting from within.

The Irony of Diaspora Demands: Lessons from the Soviet Era for Today's Iranians

In the annals of history, few regimes have epitomized tyranny quite like the Soviet Union, a colossal apparatus of control that stifled freedom across vast swaths of Eastern Europe and Russia itself. During the Cold War, dissidents and exiles in the diaspora—Russians, Poles, Hungarians, and others—fled to the West, where they vocally demanded liberty, human rights, and an end to oppression. Yet, imagine a scenario where these very voices clung stubbornly to the ideology that fueled their suffering: communism. They might protest the gulags, the secret police, and the iron-fisted rule of the Politburo, all while affirming their belief in Marxist-Leninist principles. Such a contradiction would render their calls for freedom hollow, perpetuating the cycle of subjugation they sought to escape.

This historical analogy is not mere speculation; it mirrors a contemporary reality facing the Iranian diaspora. Today, millions of Iranians living abroad rally against the Islamic Republic's brutality—the executions, the suppression of protests, the enforced veiling, and the export of terror. They gather in global cities, waving flags and chanting for regime change. But beneath this fervor lies a profound refusal to confront the root cause: Islam itself, as interpreted and enforced by the theocratic regime in Tehran. Like hypothetical communist sympathizers in the Soviet diaspora, many Iranians demand liberty while remaining tethered to the faith that underpins the tyranny they decry.

The Soviet Parallel: Clinging to the Chains

To grasp this irony, rewind to the Soviet era. Communism promised equality and workers' paradise but delivered famine, purges, and a surveillance state. Diaspora communities, enriched by exposure to democratic societies, could see the flaws in the system. Yet, if they insisted on remaining communist—perhaps romanticizing the ideology's ideals while blaming only "corrupt leaders" like Stalin or Brezhnev—they would sabotage their own liberation. True freedom would require renouncing the doctrine that justified one-party rule, censorship, and the elimination of dissent. Without that ideological break, any push for change would be superficial, allowing the same oppressive structures to reemerge under new guises.

Similarly, the Islamic Republic is not an aberration of Islam but its logical extension in a theocratic framework. Founded on the principles of Sharia law and velayat-e faqih (guardianship of the Islamic jurist), the regime enforces submission through fatwas, morality police, and revolutionary guards. Protests like those following the death of Mahsa Amini in 2022 highlight the diaspora's courage, but they often stop short of challenging the faith's foundational tenets. Calls for "reform" within an Islamic system ignore how the religion's emphasis on obedience, jihad, and divine authority has historically enabled authoritarianism—not just in Iran, but across much of the Muslim world.

Islam as the Source of Tyranny

At its core, the refusal to face this truth stems from a deep-seated attachment. Islam entered Iran through conquest in the 7th century, imposing conversion or death on the Zoroastrian majority. This "submit or perish" ethos persists in the regime's treatment of dissenters, apostates, and minorities. The diaspora complains of tyranny—the stonings, the hangings, the proxy wars—but hesitates to acknowledge that these are not deviations from Islam but manifestations of its scriptural and historical imperatives. Verses in the Quran and hadiths that advocate for strict adherence, punishment of unbelievers, and expansion through force are not fringe interpretations; they form the regime's playbook.

By remaining Muslim, even in a moderate or cultural sense, diaspora Iranians inadvertently validate the ideological foundation of the mullahs' rule. It's akin to Soviet exiles demanding freedom while quoting Lenin: the contradiction ensures that liberty remains elusive. The regime derives its legitimacy from Islam; to undermine it, one must question the faith's role in perpetuating control.

Renouncing Islam isn't about hatred or erasure of heritage—Iranians boast a rich pre-Islamic legacy of empire, poetry, and philosophy—but about breaking free from a system that glorifies death over life, conformity over individuality.

The Call to Renounce and Reclaim Freedom

The path forward is clear, though daunting: renounce Islam and become truly free. This doesn't mean adopting another religion or abandoning spirituality; it means shedding the bonds of an ideology that, in its political form, breeds tyranny. For the Iranian diaspora, this act of renunciation could be transformative. It would strip the Islamic Republic of its moral authority, inspiring mass defections within Iran and isolating the regime internationally. Protests would evolve from pleas for tweaks to declarations of independence, much like how the fall of communism required rejecting its dogma outright.

History shows that such breaks are possible and powerful. The collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 wasn't just economic; it was ideological, as people across the Eastern Bloc rejected communism's false promises. Iranians today have the same opportunity. By facing the fact that Islam—as wielded by Tehran—is the tyranny they protest, the diaspora can lead a genuine revolution. Become free, not through half-measures or illusions of reform, but through bold, collective emancipation.

In the end, liberty isn't demanded; it's seized. The Iranian diaspora, like their Soviet-era counterparts, must choose: cling to the familiar chains or shatter them forever. The world watches, hoping for the latter—a free Iran, unbound and reborn.

The Imperative of Denuclearizing Iran: War as a Last Resort Against Tyranny

War, even when justified, is a weapon of last resort—messy, unpredictable, and inevitably claiming the lives of innocents. Yet, in the face of existential threats, it may become unavoidable. The Islamic Republic of Iran represents such a threat, not merely through its military ambitions but through the tyrannical ideology that underpins its regime. With a long-standing official policy to eradicate the nation of Israel—not just defeat its army but dismantle the state entirely—Iran has built a network of proxy militias, an advanced missile program, and pursued uranium enrichment to levels perilously close to weapons-grade. As of early 2026, Iran maintains stockpiles of uranium enriched to 60%, with estimates ranging from 408.6 kg to 440.9 kg, far exceeding needs for peaceful purposes. This uncompromising pursuit demands an equally firm response: Iran cannot possess a nuclear program, with or without its ideological foundations.

The Nuclear Ambitions of a Tyrannical Regime

Iran's official stance toward Israel remains one of annihilation, as evidenced by ongoing threats and preparations for conflict, including direct missile attacks and support for anti-Israel groups. To achieve this, the regime has cultivated proxy militias across the region, such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis, while developing a sophisticated missile arsenal. Despite setbacks from U.S. and Israeli strikes in 2025, Iran is actively rebuilding its missile infrastructure, conducting naval exercises, and fortifying facilities against future attacks. Its uranium enrichment, historically reaching 60%, continues amid stalled negotiations where the U.S. demands zero enrichment, a red line Iran refuses to cross.

The demand for denuclearization is non-negotiable. Nuclear capabilities in the hands of this regime would amplify its threats, enabling coercion not just against Israel but regional neighbors. Muslims, according to the regime's interpretation of Islamic doctrine, do not choose their faith freely; apostasy is punishable by death, as stipulated in the Quran. This inherent tyranny extends beyond borders, manifesting in the regime's control over its people and its aggressive foreign policy.

Islam as the Root of Tyranny

At the heart of Iran's oppression lies what can be described as the tyrannical essence of its Islamist ideology. The Devil, in this framing, exerts absolute control over the Ayatollah, who in turn has constructed a vast infrastructure of repression—digital surveillance, judicial persecution, and armed enforcement. These are not mere tools but external expressions of Islam's foundational principles, as practiced by the regime. Islam entered Iran through conquest: convert or die. This coercive entry defines its persistence, where obedience is mandatory, and dissent equates to apostasy worthy of death.

Protesters in Iran's streets, demanding basic freedoms, are met with lethal force because, in the regime's view, they cease to be true Muslims by defying authority. One cannot oppose the regime while accepting its doctrine; the tyranny stems directly from it. This logic mirrors the regime's approach to neighbors like the UAE and Qatar, where non-obedience invites threats, such as missile strikes on Dubai. The Ayatollah positions himself as the supreme leader of all Muslims, enforcing submission through intimidation.

Extending Tyranny to the Palestinians and Beyond

The same tyrannical mindset applies to the Palestinians, whom the Islamic Republic views as pawns in its anti-Israel agenda. Enslaved by groups like Hamas—backed by Iran—the Palestinians are deemed "Muslim" only if they sustain unrelenting hostility toward Israel. Coexistence is anathema; the goal is eradication. This step-by-step tyranny permeates every aspect of Iran's foreign and domestic policy, from proxy support in Yemen and Iraq to missile drills in the Strait of Hormuz. Such a regime, built on coercion and expansionism, cannot be trusted with nuclear weapons. Its proxies continue to threaten regional stability, even as some, like Hezbollah, have been weakened. Allowing nuclear development would embolden this network, risking escalation into broader conflict.

Averting War Through Denuclearization

War remains a last resort, but the Islamic Republic's actions make it increasingly probable. Innocent lives would be lost, even in a just cause. Yet, preventing a nuclear-armed tyranny is paramount. The international community must enforce zero tolerance for Iran's nuclear ambitions, dismantling its program entirely. Only then can the cycle of tyranny be broken, sparing the region from further devastation. The regime's policy of ending Israel, its proxy wars, and its internal repression demand nothing less.

Complete this sentence with your hottest take:

A lot of problems in life are solved by… pic.twitter.com/z4moD5u3Xc

— Sahil Bloom (@SahilBloom) February 20, 2026